Performance of microbial fuel cells (MFCs) was monitored during the influent nutrient change from lactate to glucose/acetate/propionate and then to lactate. Meanwhile, anodic microbial communities were characterized by culture-independent molecular biotechnologies. Results showed MFC performance recovered rapidly when the lactate was replaced by one of its metabolic intermediates acetate, while it needed a longer time to recover if lactate substrate was converted to glucose/propionate or acetate to lactate. Secondary lactate feed enhanced the enrichment of bacterial populations dominating in first lactate feed. Electricity-producing bacteria, Geobacter spp., and beneficial helpers, Anaeromusa spp. and Pseudomonas spp., revived from a low abundance as lactate secondary supply, but microbial communities were hard to achieve former profiles in structure and composition. Hence, microbial community profiles tended to recover when outside environmental condition were restored. Different substrates selected unique functional microbial populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoroleA.P., HamiltonC.Y., VishnivetskayaT.A., LeakD., AndrasC., Morrell-FalveyJ., KellerM., and DavisonB. (2009). Integrating engineering design improvements with exoelectrogen enrichment process to increase power output from microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 191, 520.
2.
CaccavoF.Jr., LonerganD.J., LovleyD.R., DavisM., StolzJ.F., and McInerneyM.J. (1994). Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 3752.
3.
CarosiaM.F., OkadaD.Y., SakamotoI.K., SilvaE.L., and VarescheM.B.A. (2014). Microbial characterization and degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in an anaerobic reactor treating wastewater containing soap powder. Bioresour. Technol., 167, 316.
4.
ChaeK.J., ChoiM.J., LeeJ.W., KimK.Y., and KimI.S. (2009). Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3518.
5.
ChengS., LiuH., and LoganB.E. (2006). Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure. Electrochem. Commun., 8, 489.
6.
ClesceriL.S., GreenbergA.E., and EatonA.D. (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
7.
CuiM.H., CuiD., GaoL., ChengH.Y., and WangA.J. (2016). Analysis of electrode microbial communities in an up-flow bioelectrochemical system treating azo dye wastewater. Electrochim. Acta, 220, 252.
8.
FreguiaS., TehE.H., BoonN., LeungK.M., KellerJ., and RabaeyK. (2010). Microbial fuel cells operating on mixed fatty acids. Bioresour. Technol., 101, 1233.
9.
GaoC., WangA., WuW.M., YinY., and ZhaoY.G. (2014). Enrichment of anodic biofilm inoculated with anaerobic or aerobic sludge in single chambered air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol., 167, 124.
10.
JuangD.-F., YangP.-C., ChouH.-Y., and ChiuL.-J. (2011). Effects of microbial species, organic loading and substrate degradation rate on the power generation capability of microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol. Lett., 33, 2147.
11.
KimJ.R., JungS.H., ReganJ.M., and LoganB.E. (2007). Electricity generation and microbial community analysis of alcohol powered microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol., 98, 2568.
12.
KochM., DolfingJ., WuhrmannK., and ZehnderA.J. (1983). Pathways of propionate degradation by enriched methanogenic cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 45, 1411.
13.
LindgrenS.E., AxelssonL.T., and McFeetersR.F. (1990). Anaerobic l-lactate degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 66, 209.
14.
LiuH., and LoganB.E. (2004). Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4040.
15.
LoganB.E. (2009). Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 7, 375.
MichaelidouU., ter HeijneA., EuverinkG.J.W., HamelersH.V., StamsA.J., and GeelhoedJ.S. (2011). Microbial communities and electrochemical performance of titanium-based anodic electrodes in a microbial fuel cell. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77, 1069.
20.
MuyzerG. (1999). DGGE/TGGE a method for identifying genes from natural ecosystems. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 2, 317.
21.
NevinK.P., HolmesD.E., WoodardT.L., HinleinE.S., OstendorfD.W., and LovleyD.R. (2005). Geobacter bemidjiensis sp. nov. and Geobacter psychrophilus sp. nov., two novel Fe(III)-reducing subsurface isolates. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 55(Pt 4), 1667.
22.
ParkT.-J., DingW., ChengS., BrarM.S., MaA.P.Y., TunH.M., and LeungF.C. (2014). Microbial community in microbial fuel cell (MFC) medium and effluent enriched with purple photosynthetic bacterium (Rhodopseudomonas sp.). AMB Express, 4, 22.
23.
QuY., FengY., WangX., and LoganB.E. (2012). Use of a coculture to enable current production by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 78, 3484.
24.
QuanZ.X., ImW.T., and LeeS.T. (2006). Azonexus caeni sp. nov., a denitrifying bacterium isolated from sludge of a wastewater treatment plant. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 56, 1043.
25.
RubabaO., ArakiY., YamamotoS., SuzukiK., SakamotoH., MatsudaA., and FutamataH. (2013). Electricity producing property and bacterial community structure in microbial fuel cell equipped with membrane electrode assembly. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 116, 106.
26.
SunG., ThygesenA., AleM.T., MensahM., PoulsenF.W., and MeyerA.S. (2014). The significance of the initiation process parameters and reactor design for maximizing the efficiency of microbial fuel cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98, 2415.
27.
SunY., WeiJ., LiangP., and HuangX. (2011). Electricity generation and microbial community changes in microbial fuel cells packed with different anodic materials. Bioresour. Technol., 102, 10886.
28.
ZhangY., MinB., HuangL., and AngelidakiI. (2011). Electricity generation and microbial community response to substrate changes in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol., 102, 1166.
29.
ZhaoY., RenN., and WangA. (2008). Contributions of fermentative acidogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria to lactate degradation and sulfate reduction. Chemosphere, 72, 233.
30.
ZhouG., YokoyamaN., YoshinoY., YamashitaT., and KawagoshiY. (2013). Comparative study on the performance of microbial fuel cells and bacterial community at different temperatures. J. Water Environ. Technol., 11, 71.
