The aim of this study is to examine interrelationships between three dimensions of human and nature restoration: psychological, ethical, and environmental restoration, as well as exploring the link between those types of restoration, appreciation of beauty, and sustainable behavior (SB). Four-hundred and sixty-five adult residents in diverse Mexican cities participated in the study. Participants were asked to self-report their perceived psychological restoration, the (also perceived) restoration of ethics in their community, the degree of perceived environmental restoration in their surroundings, as well as their actions oriented toward sustainability and their level of appreciation of beauty. The data were processed through a structural equation model, which seems to reveal that an integral restoration—comprising psychological, ethical, and environmental dimensions—can foster SBs and is significantly influenced by individuals’ appreciation of beauty in nature. In turn, these types of restoration are deeply interconnected and jointly enhance one’s motivation toward environmentally friendly, pro-social, and self-care behaviors, collectively described as SBs. Moreover, significant correlations between aesthetical appreciation and the adoption of ethical and conservationist behaviors were demonstrated, suggesting a link between emotional connection elicited by beauty appreciation and the motivation to protect the environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeaumontS. (2009). Admiration. In LópezS. J.. (ed.), The encyclopedia of positive psychology (pp.13–14). Wiley-Blackwell.
2.
BentlerP. M. (2006). EQS: Structural equations program manual (6th ed.). Multivariate Software, Inc.
3.
BertoR., & BarbieroG. (2017). How the psychological benefits associated with exposure to nature can affect pro-environmental behaviour? Annals of Cognitive Science, 1, 16–20; doi: 10.36959/447/336
4.
BoffL. (2022). Proteger la tierra, cuidar la vida: Cómo evitar el fin del mundo. Ediciones Dabar.
5.
BraithwaiteJ. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
6.
BronfenbrennerU. (2005). Making human beings human. Sage.
7.
CarlsonA, & LintottS. (Eds.). (2008). Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: From beauty to duty. Columbia University Press.
8.
CarsonR. (1998). The sense of wonder. HarperCollins.
CelentanoD., & RousseauG. (2016). Integral ecological restoration: Restoring the link between human culture and nature. Ecological Restoration, 34, 94–97. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/618619
11.
ChemeroA. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. The MIT Press.
12.
Corral-VerdugoV. (2024). Ambientes, personas y conductas sustentables. Una visión integradora de la vida sostenible [Sustainable environments, persons, and behaviors: An integrative view of sustainable life]. McGraw-Hill.
13.
Corral-VerdugoV., PatoC., & Torres-SotoN. (2021). Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: Self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 12867–12882; doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01189-9
14.
Corral-VerdugoV., TapiaC., GarcíaF., VarelaC., CuenA., & BarrónM. (2012). Validación de una escala para medir restauración psicológica asociada a comportamientos sustentables. Psyecology, 3, 27–40; doi: 10.1174/217119712799240260
15.
Corral-VerdugoV., TapiaC., & OrtizA. (2015). On the relationship between character strengths and sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 47, 877–901; doi: 10.1177/0013916514530718
16.
De PetrisS., SquillaciotiG., BonoR., & Borgogno-MondinoE. (2021). Geomatics and epidemiology: Associating oxidative stress and greenness in urban areas. Environmental Research, 197, 110999; doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110999
17.
DiessnerR., GenthôsR., PraestK., & PohlingR. (2018). Identifying with nature mediates the influence of valuing nature’s beauty on proenvironmental behaviors. Ecopsychology, 10, 97–105; doi: 10.1089/eco.2017.0040
18.
DiessnerR., & NiemiecR. M. (2023). Can beauty save the world? Appreciation of beauty predicts proenvironmental behavior and moral elevation better than 23 other character strengths. Ecopsychology, 15, 93–109; doi: 10.1089/eco.2022.0047
FahimN. K., NegidaA. (2019). Sample size calculation guide-part 2: how to calculate the sample size for an independent cohort study. Advanced Journal of Emergency Medicine, 3–e12; doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.104
21.
OrtegaF. R. (2015). Aproximaciones a la comprensión de la conducta pacífica en jóvenes escolares: Una perspectiva desde la psicología positiva. Pensando Psicología, 11, 153–161; doi: 10.16925/pe.v11i18.1225
22.
FinkB., NeaveN., ManningJ. T., & GrammerK. (2006). Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 491–499; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017
23.
FormanR. T. (2014). Urban ecology: Science of cities. Cambridge University Press.
24.
FurmanG. C. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 215–235; doi: 10.1108/09578230410525612
25.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
26.
HaidtJ., & KeltnerD. (2004). Appreciation of beauty and excellence. In PetersonC & SeligmanM(Eds.), Character strengths and virtues (pp.537–551). Oxford University Press; American Psychological Association.
27.
HarawayD. J. (2015). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165; doi: 10.1215/22011919-3615934
28.
HartigT., KorpelaK., EvansG. W., & GärlingT. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175–194; doi: 10.1080/02815739708730435
29.
HartigT., KaiserF. G., & BowlerP. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 590–607; doi: 10.1177/00139160121973142
30.
HartleL., Mendes-SantosL., BarbosaE., BalboniG., & Charchat-FichmanH. (2021). Evidence of the validity of a novel version of the computerized cognitive screening battery CompCog. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 15, 485–496; doi: 10.1590/1980-57642021dn15-040010
31.
HauK., & MarshH. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non‐normal data and small sample sizes. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 327–351; doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x
32.
HerzogT. R., & RectorA. E. (2009). Perceived danger and judged likelihood of restoration. Environment and Behavior, 41, 387–401; doi: 10.1177/0013916508315351
IwataO. (2002). Some psychological determinants of environmentally responsible behavior. The Human Science Research Bulletin of Osaka Shoin Women’s University, 1, 31–41. https://osaka-shoin.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/2575
35.
KaaronenR. O. (2017). Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1974; doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01974
36.
KaiserF. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422; doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
37.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182; doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
38.
KaplanS. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 480–506; doi: 10.1177/00139160121973106
39.
LouvR. (2016). Vitamin N: The essential guide to a nature-rich life. Algonquin Books.
40.
Martínez-MartíM. L., Hernández-LloredaM. J., & AviaM. D. (2016). Appreciation of beauty and excellence: Relationship with personality, prosociality and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2613–2634; doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9709-6
41.
NaessA. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100; doi: 10.1080/00201747308601682
42.
NoellisteM. (2013). Integrity: An intrapersonal perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 12, 474–499; doi: 10.1177/1534484313492333
43.
NiemiecR. (2014). Mindfulness and character strengths: A practical guide to flourishing. Hogrefe.
44.
NorlingJ. C., SibthorpJ., & RuddellE. (2008). Perceived Restorativeness for Activities Scale (PRAS): Development and validation. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 5, 184–195; doi: 10.1123/jpah.5.1.184
45.
O’Boyle, E. H.Jr, & WilliamsL. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12; doi: 10.1037/a0020539
46.
PayneC. R. (2017). Defining the “environment” and the principle of environmental integrity. In StahnC, IversonJ, & EasterdayJ(eds.), Environmental protection and transitions from conflict to peace: Clarifying norms, principles and practices. Oxford University Press.
47.
PetersonC., & SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
48.
PolE. (2002). The theoretical background of the city-identity-sustainability network. Environment and Behavior, 34, 8–25; doi: 10.1177/0013916502034001002
49.
RohwerY., & MarrisE. (2016). Renaming restoration: Conceptualizing and justifying the activity as a restoration of lost moral value rather than a return to a previous state. Restoration Ecology, 24, 674–679; doi: 10.1111/rec.12398
50.
SallehM. Z. M., OthmanN., Abd MalekN., & SuddinL. S. (2022). A paradoxical proposition of connectedness to nature, recycling behaviour and psychological restoration relationship in urban park context: A path analysis evidence. Planning Malaysia, 20, 101–111; doi: 10.21837/pm.v20i20.1082
SchaeferJ. (2014). Restored to Earth: Christianity, Environmental Ethics, and Ecological Restoration. By Gretel Van Wieren. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013. vii + 208 pages. $29.95 (paper). Horizons, 41, 392–393; doi: 10.1017/hor.2014.61
53.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339; doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0227
54.
Tapia-FonllemC., Corral-VerdugoV., Fraijo-SingB., & Durón-RamosM. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5, 711–723; doi: 10.3390/su5020711
55.
ThompsonP. B. (2007). Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 5, 5–16; doi: 10.1080/14735903.2007.9684809
56.
Torres-SotoN. Y., Corral VerdugoV., Corral FríasN. S., & Rojas ArmadilloM. de L. (2021). Diseño y validación de la “Escala de conductas de autocuidado”. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 29, 721–741; doi: 10.51668/bp.8321312s
57.
Torres-SotoN. Y., Corral-VerdugoV., & Corral-FríasN. S. (2022). The relationship between self-care, positive family environment, and human wellbeing. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 3, 100076; doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2022.100076
58.
WhitburnJ., LinklaterW. L., & MilfontT. L. (2019). Exposure to urban nature and tree planting are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 51, 787–810; doi: 10.1177/0013916517751009
59.
WinterD. (2002). (En)Gendering sustainable development. In SchmuckP & SchultzP. W (eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Kluwer.
YeC., ChenY., & LiJ. (2018). Investigating the influences of tree coverage and road density on property crime. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 101; doi: 10.3390/ijgi7030101
62.
ZhangJ. W., HowellR. T., & IyerR. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55–63; doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013
