Abstract
As younger populations of environmental scientists face an uncertain future in the context of alarming climate change data, building resilience is imperative for sustaining mental health, avoiding career burnout, and remaining innovative in climate change solution efforts. Research shows a higher prevalence of eco-anxiety among young people and individuals working in professions centered on environmental and climate change science. In contrast, studies have found that individuals scoring higher in nature-relatedness report lower generalized anxiety and score higher in resilience. This study addresses the intersection of these factors at the university undergraduate student level by comparing the eco-anxiety, nature-relatedness, and resilience of environmental science majors with nonenvironmental science majors. As hypothesized, surveys from 169 students at a mid-Atlantic State University reveal significantly higher levels of climate change anxiety reported by environmental science majors compared with nonenvironmental science majors [t(167) = 1.81, p < 0.05 (one-tailed test of significance)]. In addition, environmental science majors reported significantly higher levels of nature-relatedness [t(167) = 6.05, p < 0.001]. However, measured resilience levels in each group were not significantly different. Implications are explored regarding current environmental science curriculum practices and the possible benefits of incorporating psychological principles to increase resilience inside and outside of the classroom. Key Words: Eco-anxiety—Climate change—Resilience—Nature-relatedness—Environmental education—Pro-environmental behavior
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
