At the 2019 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) sales expo, a blip in the capitalist discourse was introduced: an Earth Gratitude Booth (EGB). The booth was created to provide the Earth a gentle space of representation as more-than-object in a quintessentially Earth-objectifying environment, as well as to offer people at the convention an opportunity to consider and reflect on Earth–human interconnection. At the convention, participant observation methods were employed as convention-goers walked past the booth, took part in an Earth gratitude community art creation, and/or listened to a stoney soundscape available at two listening posts. Challenges such as maintaining physical and emotional boundaries were encountered. The experience of the booth highlighted both ecofeminist and ecopsychological perspectives, and those systems have been employed for the analysis. Despite several incidents of poignant disrespect, the outcome of the booth was positive: 64 CIM Convention-goers laid gratitude stones and many more engaged positively with the booth. This gentle placement of an EGB at a mining convention may well have served as a portal to reflection on the interconnected self.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AizenstatS. (1995). Jungian psychology and the world unconscious. In RoszakT., GomesM. E., & KannerA. D. (eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth healing the mind (pp. 92–100). Counterpoint Press.
BanerjeeD., & BellM. M. (2007). Ecogender: Locating gender in environmental social science. Society and Natural Resources, 20, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920600981272
BullisC., & GlaserH. (1992). Bureaucratic discourse and the goddess: Towards an ecofeminist critique and rearticulation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 5, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819210014878
ChagnonC. W., DuranteF., GillsB. K., Hagolani-AlbovS. E., HokkanenS., KangasluomaS. M. J., KonttinenH., KrögerM., LaFleurW., OllinahoO., & VuolaM. P. S. (2022). From extractivism to global extractivism: The evolution of an organizing concept. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49, 760–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015
DavisJ. V. (2011). Ecopsychology, transpersonal psychology, and nonduality. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 30, 137–147. https://dx.doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2011.30.1-2.137
10.
DunnD. (1999). Why do whales and children sing? A guide to listening in nature. Earth Ear.
11.
EvansR. (2015). James Tiptree Jr.: Rereading essentialism and ecofeminism in the 1970s. Women's Studies Quarterly, 43, 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2015.0048
12.
Everitt-PenhaleB., & RateleK. (2015). Rethinking ‘traditional masculinity’ as constructed, multiple, and ≠ hegemonic masculinity. South African Review of Sociology, 46, 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2015.1025826
13.
EylesN. (2002). Ontario rocks: Three billion years of environmental change. Fitzhenry and Whiteside.
FisherA. (2012). What is ecopsychology? A radical view. In KahnP. H. & HasbachP. H. (eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 79–114). MIT Press
HarrisL., & WasilewskiJ. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: Four R's (Relationship, Responsibility, Reciprocity, Redistribution) vs. two P's (Powerful and Profit). Sharing the journey towards conscious evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.631
18.
HordykS. R., DuludeM., & ShemM. (2015). When nature nurtures children: Nature as containing and holding Space. Children's Geographies, 13, 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2014.923814
19.
JonesO., & FaircloughL. (2016). Sounding grief: The Severn Estuary as an emotional soundscape. Emotion, Space and Society, 20, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2016.06.001
20.
KansakeB. A., Sakyi-AddoG. B., & Dumakor-DupeyN. K. (2021). Creating a gender-inclusive mining industry: Uncovering the challenges of female mining stakeholders. Resources Policy, 70, Article 101962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101962
21.
KearnsR. A. (2016). Placing observation in the research toolkit. In HayI. (ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (4th ed., pp. 313–333). Oxford University Press
KossakM. (2009). Therapeutic attunement: A transpersonal view of expressive arts therapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2008.09.003
24.
LambertN. M., ClarkM. S., DurtschiJ., FinchamF. D., & GrahamS. M. (2010). Benefits of expressing gratitude: Expressing gratitude to a partner changes one's view of the relationship. Psychological Science, 21, 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364003
25.
LayousK., SweenyK., ArmentaC., NaS., ChoiI., & LyubomirskyS. (2017). The proximal experience of gratitude. PLoS One, 12, Article e0179123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179123
26.
MalloryC. (2018). What's in a name? In defense of ecofeminism (not ecological feminisms, feminist ecology, or gender and the environment): Or “why ecofeminism need not be Ecofeminine—But so what if it is?.”. Ethics & the Environment, 23, 11–35. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.23.2.03
27.
MayblinL., ValentineG., KossakF., & SchneiderT. (2015). Experimenting with spaces of encounter: Creative interventions to develop meaningful contact. Geoforum, 63, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.010
28.
MerchantC. (1996). Earthcare: Women and the environment. Routledge.
MooreN. (2008). Eco/feminism, non-violence and the future of feminism. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10, 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740802185486
31.
MorganG. (2006). Images of organization. Sage Publications.
PhillipsM. (2014). Re-writing corporate environmentalism: Ecofeminism, corporeality and the language of feeling. Gender, Work and Organization, 21, 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12047
Van den NoortgaeteF. (2016). Generous being: The environmental-ethical relevance of ontological gratitude. Ethics & the Environment, 21, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.21.2.05
