Climate change and environmental degradation are critical health challenges facing society, with eco-distress increasingly and more widely reported. Previous research indicates that nature relatedness (NR) may be implicated in eco-distress. The current cross-sectional, online study expands research on eco-distress. It was hypothesized that different types of NR would lead to different manifestations of eco-distress. Participants (N = 415) completed measures of NR (nature relatedness scale, pro-environmental self-identity scale, and connectedness to nature scale) and measures of eco-distress (climate change anxiety scale, solastalgia subscale of the environmental distress scale, and climate change worry scale). Results indicated that NR-perspective, pro-environmental self-identity, and connectedness to nature may influence the occurrence of eco-distress, whereas NR-self may be protective against eco-distress. Solastalgia accounted for 29% of the variance in eco-distress, suggesting that solastalgia, not climate change anxiety was the dominant emotional response implicated in eco-distress for those with high NR. Further research is required to develop robust measures of eco-distress and determine the reciprocal nature of eco-distress to environmental degradation and the bearing this has on individual, community, and global actions to advance nature and human wellbeing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbeyJ. D., & MeloyM. G. (2017). Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. Journal of Operations Management, 53–56, 63–70.
2.
ÁgostonC., CsabaB., NagyB., KőváryZ., DúllA., RáczJ., & DemetrovicsZ. (2022). Identifying types of eco-anxiety, eco-guilt, eco-grief, and eco-coping in a climate-sensitive population: A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 2461.
3.
AlbrechtG. (2005). “Solastalgia.” A new concept in health and identity. PAN: Philosophy, Activism, Nature, 3, 41–55.
4.
AlbrechtG., SartoreG. M., ConnorL., HigginbothamN., FreemanS., KellyB., …, PollardG. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry: Bulletin of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 15, S95–S98.
BarkerL. (2017). Black Electoral Politics (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis.
7.
BaudonP., & JachensL. (2021). A scoping review of interventions for the treatment of eco-anxiety. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9636.
8.
BentlerP., & BonettD. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
9.
BertoR., BarbieroG., BarbieroP., & SenesG. (2018). An individual's connection to nature can affect perceived restorativeness of natural environments: Some observations about biophilia. Behavioral Sciences, 8, 34.
10.
BudziszewskaM., & JonssonS. E. (2021). From climate anxiety to climate action: an existential perspective on climate change concerns within psychotherapy. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/0022167821993243.
11.
BudziszewskaM., & JonssonS. E. (2022). Talking about climate change and eco-anxiety in psychotherapy: A qualitative analysis of patients' experiences. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 59, 606–615.
12.
BurnhamK. P., & AndersonD. R. (1998). Practical use of the information-theoretic approach. In K. P. Burnham, & D. R. Anderson (eds.), Model Selection and Inference (pp 75–117). New York, NY: Springer
13.
ByrneB. M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
ChuH., & YangJ. Z. (2019). Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change. Science Communication, 41, 761–789.
15.
ClaytonS. (2020). Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263.
16.
ClaytonS., & KarazsiaB. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101434.
17.
ClissoldR., McNamaraK. E., & WestobyR. (2022). Emotions of the Anthropocene across Oceania. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 6757.
18.
CookR. D., & WeisbergS. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression. New York: Chapman & Hall.
19.
ComtesseH., ErtlV., HengstS. M., RosnerR., & SmidG. E. (2021). Ecological grief as a response to environmental change.: A mental health risk or functional response?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1–10.
20.
ConnorL., AlbrechtG., HigginbothamN., FreemanS., & SmithW. (2004). Environmental change and human health in upper hunter communities of New South Wales, Australia. EcoHealth, 1, SU47–SU58.
21.
CracknellD., PahlS., WhiteM., & DepledgeM. (2018). Reviewing the role of aquaria as restorative settings: How subaquatic diversity in public aquaria can influence preferences, and human health and well-being. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23, 446–460.
22.
CrandonT. J., ScottJ. G., CharlsonF. J., & ThomasH. J. (2022). A social–ecological perspective on climate anxiety in children and adolescents. Nature Climate Change, 12, 123–131.
23.
CunsoloA., & EllisN. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8, 275–281.
24.
DeanJ., ShanahanD., BushR., GastonK., LinB., BarberE., FrancoL., & FullerR. (2018). Is nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1371.
25.
du BrayM., WutichA., LarsonK. L., WhiteD. D., & BrewisA. (2019). Anger and sadness: Gendered emotional responses to climate threats in four island nations. Cross-Cultural Research, 53, 58–86.
26.
EkholmS. (2020). Swedish mothers' and fathers' worries about climate change: A gendered story. Journal of Risk Research, 23, 288–296.
27.
EllisN., & AllbrechtG. (2017). Climate change threats to family farmers' sense of place and mental wellbeing: A case study from the Western Australian Wheatbelt. Social Science and Medicine, 175, 161–168.
28.
EngstromS. (2019). Recognising the role eco-grief plays in responding to environmental degradation. Journal of Transdisciplinary Peace Praxis, 1, 168–186.
29.
FieldA. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
FrancoL., ShanahanD., & FullerR. (2017). A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 864.
31.
GalwayL. P., BeeryT., Jones-CaseyK., & TasalaK. (2019). Mapping the solastalgia literature: A scoping review study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 2662.
32.
GislasonM. K., KennedyA. M., & WithamS. M. (2021). The interplay between social and ecological determinants of mental health for children and youth in the climate crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4573.
33.
GunasiriH., WangY., WatkinsE.-M., CapetolaT., Henderson-WilsonC., & PatrickR. (2022). Hope, coping and eco-anxiety: Young people's mental health in a climate-impacted Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 5528.
34.
HawkinsR. (2022). Debate: Inequalities within understanding of Eco Distress. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27, 73–74.
35.
HeerenA., Mouguiama-DaoudaC., & ContrerasA. (2022). On climate anxiety and the threat it may pose to daily life functioning and adaptation: A study among European and African French-speaking participants. Climatic Change, 173, 15–15.
36.
HigginbothamN., ConnorL., AlbrechtG., FreemanS., & AghoK. (2006). Validation of an environmental distress scale. EcoHealth, 3, 245–254.
37.
HoggT., StanleyS. K., O'BrienL. V., WilsonM. S., & WatsfordC. R. (2021). The Hogg eco-anxiety scale: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102391.
38.
HooperD., CoughlanJ., & MullenM. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
39.
HowardC., RoseC., DoddW., ScottP., Cunsulo-WilloxA., & OrbinskiJ. (2017). SOS: Summer of smoke—a mixed-methods, community-based study investigating the health effects of a prolonged, severe wildfire season on a subarctic population. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19, S99–S99.
40.
HoyleR. H. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Iniguez-GallardoV., Lenti BoeroD., & TzanopoulosJ. (2021). Climate change and emotions: Analysis of people's emotional states in southern Ecuador. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 644240.
42.
JöreskogK., & SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
43.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
KellyA. (2017). Eco-Anxiety at University: Student Experiences and Academic Perspectives on Cultivating Healthy Emotional Responses to the Climate Crisis. [Independent Study Thesis, The University of Colorado]. Independent Study Project Collection. Retrieved from https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2642
45.
KlineR. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
46.
LehmanB., ThompsonJ., DavisS., & CarlsonJ. (2019). Affective images of climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 960.
47.
LeysC., DelacreM., MoraY. L., LakensD., & LeyC. (2019). How to classify, detect, and manage univariate and multivariate outliers, with emphasis on pre-registration. International Review of Social Psychology, 32, 5.
48.
MagalhãesS., MirandaD., de MirandaD., Malloy-DinizL., Romano-SilvaM., & Leal-SotoF. (2018). The extreme climate event database (EXCEED): Development of a picture database composed of drought and flood stimuli. PLoS One, 13, e0204093.
49.
MaranD. A., & BegottiT. (2021). Media exposure to climate change, anxiety, and efficacy beliefs in a sample of Italian University students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 9358.
50.
MarksE., & HickmanC. (2023). Eco-distress is not a pathology, but it still hurts. Nature Mental Health, 1, 379–380.
51.
MartinL., WhiteM., HuntA., RichardsonM., PahlS., & BurtJ. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101389.
52.
MartynP., & BrymerE. (2016). The relationship between Nature Relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 1436–1445.
53.
MayerF., & FrantzC. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
54.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
McMahanE., & EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.
57.
McMahanE., EstesD., MurfinJ., & BryanC. (2018). Nature connectedness moderates the effect of nature exposure on explicit and implicit measures of emotion. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 2, 128–148.
58.
MkonoM., & HughesK. (2020). Eco-guilt and eco-shame in tourism consumption contexts: Understanding the triggers and responses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28, 1223–1244.
59.
NisbetE., ZelenskiJ., & MurphyS. (2009). The nature relatedness scale linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
60.
NutsfordD., PearsonA., KinghamS., & ReitsmaF. (2016). Residential exposure to visible blue space (but not green space) associated with lower psychological distress in a capital city. Health and Place, 39, 70–78.
61.
PassmoreH., & HolderM. (2017). Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two- week intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 537–546.
62.
PassmoreH. A., LutzP. K., & HowellA. J. (2022). Eco-anxiety: A cascade of fundamental existential anxieties. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 36, 138–153.
63.
PatrickR., GaradR., SnellT., EnticottJ., & MeadowsG. (2021). Australians report climate change as a bigger concern than COVID-19. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 3, 100032.
64.
PedhazurE. J., & SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65.
PennyK. (1996). Appropriate critical values when testing for a single multivariate outlier by using the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 45, 73–81.
66.
PihkalaP. (2018). Eco-anxiety, tragedy, and hope: Psychological and spiritual dimensions of climate change. Zygon, 53, 545–569.
67.
QiuL., LindbergS., & NielsenA. (2013). Is biodiversity attractive? On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119, 136–146.
68.
RothermichK., JohnsonE. K., GriffithR. M., & BeingoleaM. M. (2021). The influence of personality traits on attitudes towards climate change—An exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110304.
69.
SchertzK., & BermanM. (2019). Understanding nature and its cognitive benefits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 496–502.
70.
SciberrasE., & FernandoJ. W. (2022). Climate change-related worry among Australian adolescents: An eight-year longitudinal study. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27, 22–29.
71.
SchumackerR. E., & LomaxR. G. (2004). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
72.
SearleK., & GowK. (2010). Do concerns about climate change lead to distress?. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 2, 362–379.
73.
SmithC., AllenA., & Kannis-DymandL. (2022). Social media may contribute to eco-distress: The role of nature relatedness as both causal mechanism and protective factor. Ecopsychology, 14, 17–29.
74.
SouthonG., JorgensenA., DunnettN., HoyleH., & EvansK. (2018). Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 172, 1–10.
75.
StanleyS. K., HoggT. L., LevistonZ., & WalkerI. (2021). From anger to action: Differential impacts of eco-anxiety, eco-depression, and eco-anger on climate action and wellbeing. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 1, 100003.
76.
SteigerJ. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
77.
StewartA. E. (2021). Psychometric properties of the climate change worry scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 494.
78.
SwimJ. K., AvisteR., LengiezaM. L., & FasanoC. J. (2022). OK boomer: A decade of generational differences in feelings about climate change. Global Environmental Change, 73, 102479.
TangI., SullivanW., & ChangC. (2015). Perceptual evaluation of natural landscapes: The role of the individual connection to nature. Environment and Behavior, 47, 595–617.
81.
ThompsonT. (2021). Young people's climate anxiety revealed in landmark survey. Nature (London), 597, 605–605.
82.
UlrichR. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In (I. Altman, & J. F. Wohlwill (eds.), Human Behavior and Environment (Volume 6, pp. 85–125). New York: Plenum Press
83.
United Nations. (2022, September 4). United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs Sustainable Development: Do You Know All 17 SDGs? Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
84.
VerplankenB., & RoyD. (2013). “My worries are rational, climate change is not”: Habitual ecological worrying is an adaptive response. PLoS One, 8, e74708.
85.
VerplankenB., MarksE., & DobromirA. I. (2020). On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101528.
86.
WheatonB., MuthenB., AlwinD., & SummersG. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8, 84.
87.
WhitmarshL., & O'NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305–314.
88.
WilcoxR. R. (2010). Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Improving Power and Accuracy. (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
89.
WilsonE. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
