As many studies show, action for nature is related to connectedness with nature, and both have roots in nature experiences during childhood and youth. Through a literature review, we combine empirical studies on the interplay between experiences in nature during childhood and youth, connectedness with nature, and action for nature and uncover a new way of structuring understandings of connectedness with nature: humans and nature as separate yet related entities (intertwined), one as part of the other (including), and as one entity (indistinguishable). Although the interplay between experiences, connectedness, and action for nature has been clearly demonstrated, the underlying mechanisms are still to be unraveled. Studying this interplay through the lens of these three different understandings of nature contributes to elucidating the underlying mechanisms. We suggest how connectedness can be strengthened in terms of the findings of the studies included in the review and present two potential pathways: through experiences and through identification. Finally, we provide recommendations for future research using the integral ecology framework and call for more diversity in research methodologies and respondents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AartsM. N. C. (2018). Dynamics and dependency in socio-ecological interactions. Nijmegen: Radboud University (inaugural lecture).
2.
AhmetogluE. (2019). The contributions of familial and environmental factors to children's connection with nature and outdoor activities. Early Child Development and Care, 189, 233–243.
3.
ArbuthnottK. D., SutterG. C., & HeidtC. T. (2014). Natural history museums, parks, and connection with nature. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29, 102–121.
4.
ArendtF., & MatthesJ. (2016). Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication, 10, 453–472.
5.
ArnoldH. E., CohenF. G., & WarnerA. (2009). Youth and environmental action: Perspectives of young environmental leaders on their formative influences. Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 27–36.
6.
AsahS. T., BengstonD. N., WestphalL. M., & GowanC. H. (2018). Mechanisms of children's exposure to nature: Predicting adulthood environmental citizenship and commitment to nature-based activities. Environment and Behavior, 50, 807–836.
7.
BarthelS., BeltonS., RaymondC. M., & GiustiM. (2018). Fostering children's connection to nature through authentic situations: The case of saving salamanders at school. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 928.
8.
Boeve-de PauwJ., & Van PetegemP. (2017). Because my friends insist or because it makes sense? Adolescents' motivation towards the environment. Sustainability, 9, 750.
9.
BraunT., & DierkesP. (2017). Connecting students to nature—How intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23, 937–949.
10.
BruniC. M., BallewM. T., WinterP. L., & OmotoA. M. (2018). Natural history museums may enhance youth's implicit connectedness with nature. Ecopsychology, 10, 280–288.
11.
BruniC. M., & SchultzP. W. (2010). Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 95–102.
12.
ChawlaL. (2020). Childhood nature connection and constructive hope: A review of research on connecting with nature and coping with environmental loss. People and Nature, 2, 619–642.
13.
ClaytonS., ColléonyA., ConversyP., MacloufE., MartinL., TorresA. C., … PrévotA. C. (2017). Transformation of experience: Toward a new relationship with nature. Conservation Letters, 10, 645–651.
14.
ClaytonS., CzellarS., Nartova-BochaverS., SkibinsJ. C., SalazarG., TsengY. C., … Monge-RodriguezF. S. (2021). Cross-cultural validation of a revised environmental identity scale. Sustainability, 13, 2387.
15.
ClearyA., FieldingK. S., MurrayZ., & RoikoA. (2020). Predictors of nature connection among urban residents: Assessing the role of childhood and adult nature experiences. Environment and Behavior, 52, 579–610.
16.
ColladoS., StaatsH., & CorralizaJ. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children's summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 37–44.
17.
D'AmoreC., & ChawlaL. (2020). Significant life experiences that connect children with nature: A research review and applications to a family nature club. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie-Knowles, K. Malone, & E. Barratt Hacking (eds.), Research handbook on childhood nature: Assemblages of childhood and nature research (pp. 799–825). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
18.
DavisA. C., & StroinkM. L. (2016). Within-culture differences in self-construal, environmental concern, and proenvironmental behavior. Ecopsychology, 8, 64–73.
19.
de GrootM., DrenthenM., & de GrootW. T. (2011). Public visions of the human/nature relationship and their implications for environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 33, 25–44.
20.
de GrootW. T., BonaiutoM., DedeurwaerdereT., & KnippenbergL. (2015). A theory of committed action for nature. Nijmegen: The BIOMOT Project, ISIS, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen.
21.
DeweyA. M. (2021). Shaping the environmental self: The role of childhood experiences in shaping identity standards of environmental behavior in adulthood. Sociological Perspectives, 64, 657–675.
22.
DiessnerR., GenthôsR., PraestK., & PohlingR. (2018). Identifying with nature mediates the influence of valuing nature's beauty on proenvironmental behaviors. Ecopsychology, 10, 97–105.
23.
DornhoffM., SothmannJ-N., FiebelkornF., & MenzelS. (2019). Nature relatedness and environmental concern of young people in Ecuador and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 453.
24.
DriscollD. (2018). Beyond organizational ties: Foundations of persistent commitment in environmental activism. Social Movement Studies, 17, 697–715.
25.
DunlapR. E. V. L., LiereK. V., MertigA., & JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
26.
Esbjörn-HargensS., & ZimmermanM. (2009). An overview of integral ecology. Resource Paper, 2, 1–14.
27.
FlickO. (2009). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London, England: Sage Publications.
28.
FrantzC. M., & MayerF. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85–89.
29.
FreemanC., & van HeezikY. (2018). Children, nature and cities: Rethinking the connections. London, England: Routledge.
30.
GiustiM. (2019). Human-nature relationships in context. Experiential, psychological, and contextual dimensions that shape children's desire to protect nature. PLoS One, 14, 0225951.
31.
HattyM. A., SmithL. D. G., GoodwinD., & MavondoF. T. (2020). The CN-12: A brief, multidimensional connection with nature instrument. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1566.
32.
HehirC., StewartE. J., MaherP. T., & RibeiroM. A. (2021). Evaluating the impact of a youth polar expedition alumni programme on post-trip pro-environmental behaviour: A community-engaged research approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29, 1635–1654.
33.
HicksR., & TingleyD. (2011). Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal, 11, 605–619.
34.
HooverK. S. (2021). Children in nature: Exploring the relationship between childhood outdoor experience and environmental stewardship. Environmental Education Research, 27, 894–910.
35.
HowellR. A., & AllenS. (2019). Significant life experiences, motivations and values of climate change educators. Environmental Education Research, 25, 813–831.
36.
Ibáñez-RuedaN., Guillén-RoyoM., & GuardiolaJ. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior, connectedness to nature, and wellbeing dimensions among Granada students. Sustainability, 12, 9171.
37.
IvesC. D., AbsonD. J., von WehrdenH., DorningerC., KlanieckiK., & FischerJ. (2018). Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 13, 1389–1397.
38.
IvesC. D., GiustiM., FischerJ., AbsonD. J., KlanieckiK., DorningerC., … Von WehrdenH. (2017). Human–nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 106–113.
39.
KashimaY., PaladinoA., & MargettsE. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64–75.
40.
KeaulanaS., Kahili-HeedeM., RileyL., ParkM. L. N., MakuaK. L., VegasJ. K., & AntonioM. C. (2021). A scoping review of nature, land, and environmental connectedness and relatedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5897.
41.
KellertS. R., & WilsonE. O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
42.
KellyC. (2018). ‘I need the sea and the sea needs me’: Symbiotic coastal policy narratives for human wellbeing and sustainability in the UK. Marine Policy, 97, 223–231.
43.
KlanieckiK., LeventonJ., & AbsonD. J. (2018). Human–nature connectedness as a ‘treatment’ for pro-environmental behavior: Making the case for spatial considerations. Sustainability Science, 13, 1375–1388.
44.
KrasnyM. E., & DeliaJ. (2015). Natural area stewardship as part of campus sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 87–96.
45.
KrizanovaJ., & GuardiolaJ. (2021). Happy but vegetarian? Understanding the relationship of vegetarian subjective well-being from the nature-connectedness perspective of university students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16, 2221–2249.
KuoM., BarnesM., & JordanC. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305.
48.
LengiezaM. L., & SwimJ. K. (2021). The paths to connectedness: A review of the antecedents of connectedness to nature. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763231
49.
LengiezaM. L., SwimJ. K., & HuntC. A. (2021). Effects of post-trip eudaimonic reflections on affect, self-transcendence and philanthropy. The Service Industries Journal, 41, 285–306.
50.
LittleH. (2015). Mothers' beliefs about risk and risk-taking in children's outdoor play. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15, 24–39.
51.
LumberR., RichardsonM., & SheffieldD. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12, e0177186.
52.
MackayC. M., & SchmittM. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323
53.
MaslowA. H. (1969). Various meanings of transcendence. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 1, 56–66.
54.
MolinarioE., LorenziC., BartoccioniF., PerucchiniP., BobethS., ColléonyA., … BonaiutoM. (2020). From childhood nature experiences to adult pro-environmental behaviors: An explanatory model of sustainable food consumption. Environmental Education Research, 26, 1137–1163.
55.
MooreD., MorrisseyA. M., & RobertsonN. (2019). ‘I feel like I'm getting sad there’: Early childhood outdoor playspaces as places for children's wellbeing. Early Child Development and Care, 191, 933–951.
56.
MullenbachL. E., AndrejewskiR. G., & MowenA. J. (2019). Connecting children to nature through residential outdoor environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 25, 365–374.
57.
MustapaN. D., MalikiN. Z., AzizN. F., & HamzahA. (2019). Children's direct and indirect experiences with nature and their connectedness to nature. Planning Malaysia, 17, 203–214.
58.
NicolosiE., & CorbettJ. B. (2018). Engagement with climate change and the environment: A review of the role of relationships to place. Local Environment, 23, 77–99.
59.
NijlandH. J., AartsN., & Van WoerkumC. M. (2018). Exploring the framing of animal farming and meat consumption: On the diversity of topics used and qualitative patterns in selected demographic contexts. Animals, 8, 17.
60.
NisbetE. K., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.
61.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303–322.
62.
NoltJ. (2006). The move from good to ought in environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics, 28, 355–374.
63.
PáramoP., & MejíaM. A. (2004). Los parques urbanos como oportunidades para la interacción de los niños con los animales [Urban parks as opportunities for interaction of children with animals]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 36, 73–84.
64.
PlumwoodV. (2006). The concept of a cultural landscape: Nature, culture and agency in the land. Ethics and the Environment, 11, 115–150.
65.
PrasetyoD. T., DjuwitaR., & AriyantoA. (2018). Who is more related to the nature? A study from Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences, 74, 08009.
66.
PyleR. M. (2003). Nature matrix: Reconnecting people and nature. Oryx, 37, 206–214.
67.
RaymondC. M., BrownG., & WeberD. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 422–434.
68.
RestallB., & ConradE. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264–278.
69.
RosaC. D., & ColladoS. (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Setting the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–9.
70.
RosaC. D., ProficeC. C., & ColladoS. (2018). Nature experiences and adults' self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1055.
71.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
72.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human–nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). New York, USA: Springer.
73.
SheldrakeR., & ReissM. J. (2021). Primary children's views about appreciating, supporting, and learning about nature. Journal of Biological Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1909643
74.
SobkoT., BrownG. T., & ChengW. H. (2020). Does connectedness to nature improve the eating behaviours of pre-schoolers? Emerging evidence from the Play&Grow randomised controlled trial in Hong Kong. Appetite, 154, 104781.
75.
SogaM., EvansM. J., YamanoiT., FukanoY., TsuchiyaK., KoyanagiT. F., & KanaiT. (2020). How can we mitigate against increasing biophobia among children during the extinction of experience?. Biological Conservation, 242, 108420.
76.
SogaM., GastonK. J., YamauraY., KurisuK., & HanakiK. (2016). Both direct and vicarious experiences of nature affect children's willingness to conserve biodiversity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13, 529.
77.
SogaM., TsuchiyaK., EvansM. J., & IshibashiS. (2019). The inequalities of the extinction of experience: The role of personal characteristics and species traits in the distribution of people–plant interactions in Japan. Ecological Research, 34, 350–359.
78.
StegL., De GrootJ. I., DreijerinkL., AbrahamseW., & SieroF. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, 24, 349–367.
79.
StevensT. M., AartsN., TermeerC. J. A. M., & DewulfA. (2016). Social media as a new playing field for the governance of agro-food sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 99–106.
80.
SzczytkoR., StevensonK. T., PetersonM. N., & BondellH. (2020). How combinations of recreational activities predict connection to nature among youth. Journal of Environmental Education, 51, 462–476.
81.
TamK. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
82.
TorkarG. (2014). Learning experiences that produce environmentally active and informed minds. NJAS—Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 69, 49–55.
83.
van den BornR. J., ArtsB., AdmiraalJ., BeringerA., KnightsP., MolinarioE., … De GrootW. T. (2018). The missing pillar: Eudemonic values in the justification of nature conservation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 841–856.
84.
Van der WerffE., StegL., KeizerK. (2013). The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55–63.
85.
van LieshoutM., & AartsN. (2008). Youth and immigrants' perspectives on Public Spaces. Space and Culture 11, 497–513.
86.
van WoerkumC. (2019). In contact met de natuur. [, In contact with nature, ]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Uitgeverij IJzer.
87.
VenterH. J. (2012). Maslow's self-transcendence: How it can enrich organization culture and leadership. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 2, 64–71.
88.
WaiteS., GoodenoughA., NorrisV., & PuttickN. (2016). From little acorns…: Environmental action as a source of well-being for schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education, 34, 43–61.
89.
WangW. C. (2019). The effect of early-life outdoor experiences on residents' attitudes towards sustainable tourism within an urban context. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 25, 1–9.
90.
WellsN. M., & LekiesK. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children Youth and Environments, 16, 1–24.
91.
WhitburnJ., LinklaterW., & AbrahamseW. (2020). Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology, 34, 180–193.
92.
WoolleyH. E., & GriffinE. (2015). Decreasing experiences of home range, outdoor spaces, activities and companions: Changes across three generations in Sheffield in north England. Children's Geographies, 13, 677–691.
93.
WylesK. J., WhiteM. P., HattamC., PahlS., KingH., & AustenM. (2019). Are some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environment and Behavior, 51, 111–143.
94.
YılmazS., ÇığO., & Yılmaz-BolatE. (2020). The impact of a short-term nature-based education program on young children's biophilic tendencies. Elementary Education Online, 19, 1729–1739.
95.
ZylstraM. J., KnightA. T., EslerK. J., & Le GrangeL. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2, 119–143.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
