Underlying mechanisms behind the benefits of nature-based exercise (NBE) for subjective wellbeing (SWB) remain largely unknown. Nature- and social-connectedness may be the factors that contribute to better subjective welling. This study explores whether nature connectedness and social connectedness mediate the relationship between NBE and SWB.
Method:
Participants (N = 359 Australian citizens; Female = 229 (63.8%); Mage = 40.15, SD = 16.23) recruited through social media responded to an online survey focused on NBE, SWB, social connectedness, and nature connectedness.
Results:
Correlations revealed positive associations between variables. The relationship between NBE and SWB was significantly serially mediated by nature connectedness and social connectedness. Yet, at an individual level, social connectedness mediated the relationship, but nature connectedness was not significant.
Conclusion:
It is important that researchers better understand potential mechanisms associated with increased perception of happiness and life satisfaction through nature. Individuals who exercise in nature, with stronger connections to nature, perceive a stronger bond to the social world, and are more likely to have greater wellbeing. The importance of social connectedness identified further supports that more research is needed to better understand the role of connection to humanity regarding exercise in nature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmbreyC., & FlemingC. (2014). Life satisfaction in Australia: Evidence from ten years of the HILDA survey. Social Indicators Research, 115, 691–714.
2.
AraújoD., BrymerE., WithagenR., BritoH., and DavidsK. (2019). The empowering variability of affordances of nature: Why do exercisers feel better after performing the same exercise in natural environments than in indoor environments?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 138–145.
3.
BertoR. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409.
4.
BrymerE., CuddihyT. F. & Sharma-BrymerV. (2010) The role of nature-based experiences in the development and maintenance of wellness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 1, 21–27.
5.
BrymerE., & DavidsK. (2014). Experiential learning as a constraint-led process: An ecological dynamics perspective. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14, 103–117.
6.
BrymerE., & SchweitzerR. (2017). Evoking the ineffable: The phenomenology of extreme sports. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 63–74.
7.
CalogiuriG., & ElliottL. R. (2017). Why do people exercise in natural environments? Norwegian adults' motives for nature-, gym-, and sports-based exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 377.
8.
CapaldiC. A., DopkoR. L., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.
9.
CartwrightB. D. S., WhiteM. P., & ClitherowT. J. (2018). Nearby nature “buffers” the effect of low social connectedness on adult subjective wellbeing over the last 7 days. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 1238.
10.
CervinkaR., RödererK., & HeflerE. (2011). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness to nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379–388.
11.
DavidsK., AraujoD., & BrymerE. (2016). Designing affordances for physical activity: An ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine, 46, 933–938.
DienerE., PressmanS. D., HunterJ., & DelgadilloC. D. (2017). If, why, and when subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. Applied Psychology: Health & Well-Being, 9, 133–167.
14.
FrumkinH., BratmanG. N., BreslowS. J., CochranB., KahnP. H.Jr, LawlerJ. J., LevinP. S., TandonP. S., VaranasiU., WolfK. L., & WoodS. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 075001.
15.
GoldyS. P., & PiffP. K. (2020). Toward a social ecology of prosociality: Why, when, and where nature enhances social connection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 27–31.
16.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
17.
HowellA. J., DopkoR. L., PassmoreH. A., & BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.
18.
KaplanR. & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KolokotsaD., LilliA. Α., LilliM. A., & NikolaidisN. P. (2020). On the impact of nature- based solutions on citizens' health & well being. Energy & Buildings, 229, 110527.
20.
LawtonE., BrymerE., CloughP., & DenovanA. (2017). The relationship between the physical activity environment, nature relatedness, anxiety, and the psychological well- being benefits of regular exercisers. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1058.
21.
LeeR. M., DraperM., & LeeS. (2001). Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 310–318.
22.
LeeR. M., & RobbinsS. B. (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 338–345.
23.
LoureiroA., & VelosoS. (2014). Outdoor exercise, well-being and connectedness to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 299–304.
24.
MartynP., & BrymerE. (2016). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psycholy, 21, 1436–1445.
25.
MayerF. S. & FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
26.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
27.
MeltzoffJ., & CooperH. (2018). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
MoretonS., ArenaA., & TiliopoulosN. (2019). Connectedness to nature is more strongly related to connection to distant, rather than close, others. Ecopsychology, 11, 59–65.
29.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
30.
PassmoreH. A., & HowellA. J. (2014). Nature involvement increases hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A two-week experimental study. Ecopsychology, 6, 148–154.
31.
PenedoF. J., & DahnJ. R. (2005). Exercise and well-being: A review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 18, 189–193.
32.
PhulkerdS., ThapsuwanS., ChamratrithirongA., & GrayR. S. (2021). Influence of healthy lifestyle behaviors on life satisfaction in the aging population of Thailand: A national population-based survey. BMC Public Health, 21, 43.
33.
PoonK. T., TengF., WongW. Y., & ChenZ. (2016). When nature heals: Nature exposure moderates the relationship between ostracism and aggression. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 159–168.
34.
RogersonM., GladwellV. F., GallagherD. J., & BartonJ. L. (2016). Influence of green outdoors versus indoors environmental settings on psychological and social outcomes of controlled exercise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040363.
35.
RogersonM., WoodC., PrettyJ., SchoenmakersP., BloomfieldD., & BartonJ. (2020). Regular doses of nature: The efficacy of green exercise interventions for mental wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1526.
36.
RyanR. M., WeinsteinN., BernsteinJ., BrownK. W., MistrettaL., & GagnéM. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 159–168.
37.
SandiferP. A., Sutton-GrierA. E., & WardB. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15.
38.
ShanahanD., FrancoL., LinB., GastonK., & FullerR. (2016). The benefits of natural environments for physical activity. Sports Medicine, 46, 989–995.
39.
ShiotaM., KeltnerD., & MossmanA. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 944–963.
40.
ToppC. W., ØstergaardS. D., SøndergaardS., & BechP. (2015). The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 167–176.
41.
Twohig-BennettC., & JonesA. (2018). The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environmental Research, 166, 628–637.
42.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.
43.
WilsonE. (1984). Biophilia. London: Harvard University Press.
44.
WolskoC., LindbergK., & ReeseR. (2019). Nature-based physical recreation leads to psychological well-being: Evidence from five studies. Ecopsychology, 11, 222–235.
45.
World Health Organization. (2021). Green and blue spaces and mental health: New evidence and perspectives for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
46.
YehH. P., StoneJ. A., ChurchillS. M., WheatJ. S., BrymerE., & DavidsK. (2016). Physical, psychological and emotional benefits of green physical activity: An ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine, 46, 947–953.
