Numerous studies have shown a positive impact of nature on psychological restoration and on well-being, which, in turn, are related to life satisfaction. Previous studies were place based or episode assessments, usually in the field. Here, we studied bird-watchers at different levels of their recreational specialization, especially the factor commitment. We applied a leisure activity-related questionnaire to assess psychological restorativeness. We analyzed responses from 388 bird-watchers (260 male, 127 female, 1 diverse) from an internet survey. Three factors emerged and were labeled as restoration, detachment, and experiencing freedom. We here show for the first time that the psychological restorativeness of a leisure activity is dependent on the recreational specialization level. Psychological commitment toward birding was related to all three factors. Thus, birders do not need to have a high knowledge or must do many birding trips, but rather birding needs to be important to their life. This, in turn, suggests that even beginners in bird-watching with low expertise may gain health benefits from their leisure activity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamA., SommerhalderK., & AbelT. (2010). Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. International Journal of Public Health, 55, 59–69.
2.
BasuA., DuvallJ., & KaplanR. (2019). Attention restoration theory: Exploring the role of soft fascination and mental bandwidth. Environment and Behavior, 51, 1055–1081.
3.
BoothJ. E., GastonK. J., EvansK. L., & ArmsworthP. R. (2011). The value of species rarity in biodiversity recreation: A birdwatching example. Biological Conservation, 144, 2728–2732.
4.
BrockM., FraserI., LawC., MitchellS., & RobertsD. L. (2021). An economic analysis of twitching behaviour and species rarity. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10, 54–73.
5.
BrockM., PerinoG., & SugdenR. (2017). The warden attitude: An investigation of the value of interaction with everyday wildlife. Environmental and Resource Economics, 67, 127–155.
6.
BryanH. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreation specialisation. Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174–187.
7.
BryceR., IrvineK. N., ChurchA., FishR., RangerS., & KenterJ. O. (2016). Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 21, 258–269.
8.
CameronR. W. F., BrindleyP., MearsM., McEwanK., FergusonF., SheffieldD., … RichardsonM. (2020). Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans?. Urban Ecosystems, 23, 301–317.
9.
ClarkN. E., LovellR., WheelerB. W., HigginsS. L., DeledgeN. H., & NorrisK. (2014). Biodiversity, cultural pathways, and human health: A framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 198–204.
10.
ClucasB., RabotyagovS., & MarzluffJ. M. (2015). How much is that birdie in my backyard? A cross-continental economic valuation of native urban songbirds. Urban Ecosystems, 18, 251–266.
11.
CodinaN., & PestanaJ. V. (2019). Time matters differently in leisure experience for men and women: Leisure dedication and time perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 2513.
12.
CordellH. K., & HerbertN. G. (2002). The popularity of birding is still growing. Birding, 34, 54–61.
13.
CostelloA. B., & OsborneJ. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 7.
14.
CrossanC., & SalmoniA. (2021). A simulated walk in nature: Testing predictions from the attention restoration theory. Environment and Behavior, 53, 277–295.
15.
DallimerM., IrvineK. N., SkinnerA. M., DaviesZ. G., RouquetteJ. R., MaltbyL. L., … GastonK. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 62, 47–55.
16.
DeanJ., van DoorenK., & WeinsteinP. (2011). Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings?. Medical Hypotheses, 76, 877–880.
17.
de Camargo BarbosaK. V., DeveleyP. F., & RibeiroM. C. (2021). The contribution of citizen science to research on migratory and urban birds in Brazil. Ornithology Research, 29, 1–11.
18.
DeckerD. J., BrownT. L., DriverB. L., & BrownP. J. (1987). Theoretical developments in assessing social values of wildlife: Toward a comprehensive understanding of wildlife recreation involvement. In D. J. Decker and G. R. Goff (eds.), Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives (pp. 76–95). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
de VriesL. P., BaselmansB. M., & BartelsM. (2021). Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of well-being: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 2361–2408.
20.
DienerE., & Biswas-DienerR. (2011). Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. New York: Wiley.
21.
DutcherD. D., FinleyJ. C., LuloffA. E., & JohnsonJ. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474–493.
22.
EtikanI., AlkassimR., & AbubakarS. (2016). Comparision of snowball sampling and sequential sampling technique. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 3, 55.
23.
FelappiJ. F., SommerJ. H., FalkenbergT., TerlauW., & KötterT. (2020). Green infrastructure through the lens of “One Health”: A systematic review and integrative framework uncovering synergies and trade-offs between mental health and wildlife support in cities. Science of the Total Environment, 748, 141589.
24.
FrątczakM., SparksT. H., RandlerC., & TryjanowskiP. (2020). Circadian preferences of birdwatchers in Poland: Do “owls” prefer watching night birds, and “larks” prefer daytime ones?. PeerJ, 8, e8673.
25.
FullerR. A., IrvineK. N., Devine-WrightP., WarrenP. H., & GastonK. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–394.
26.
HartigT., KorpelaK., EvansG. W., & GärlingT. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175–194.
27.
HepburnL., SmithA. C., ZelenskiJ., & FahrigL. (2020). Bird diversity unconsciously increases people's satisfaction with where they live. Land, 10, 153.
28.
HvenegaardG. T. (2002). Birder specialization differences in conservation involvement, demographics, and motivations. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7, 21–36.
29.
JaneczkoE., ŁukowskiA., BielinisE., WoźnickaM., JaneczkoK., & KorczN. (2021). “Not just a hobby, but a lifestyle”: Characteristics, preferences and self-perception of individuals with different levels of involvement in birdwatching. PLos One, 16, e0255359.
30.
JohanssonM., FlyktA., FrankJ., & HartigT. (2021). Appraisals of wildlife during restorative opportunities in local natural settings. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 635757.
31.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
32.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
33.
KondoM. C., Triguero-MasM., Donaire-GonzalezD., SetoE., ValentínA., HurstG., … NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2020). Momentary mood response to natural outdoor environments in four European cities. Environment International, 134, 105237.
34.
KorpelaK. M., YlénM., TyrväinenL., & SilvennoinenH. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & Place, 14, 636–652.
LarsonL. R., CooperC. B., FutchS., SinghD., ShipleyN. J., DaleK., LeBaronG. S., & TakekawaJ. Y. (2020). The diverse motivations of citizen scientists: Does conservation emphasis grow as volunteer participation progresses?. Biological Conservation, 242, 108428.
LevE., KahnJr., P. H., ChenH., & EsperumG. (2020). Relatively wild urban parks can promote human resilience and flourishing: A case study of Discovery Park, Seattle, Washington. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, 2.
39.
Lindemann-MatthiesP., JungeX., & MatthiesD. (2010). The influence of plant diversity on people's perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biological Conservation, 143, 195–202.
40.
Lindemann-MatthiesP., & MatthiesD. (2018). The influence of plant species richness on stress recovery of humans. Web Ecology, 18, 121–128.
41.
MallerC., TownsendM., PryorA., BrownP., & St LegerL. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people: ‘contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21, 45–54.
42.
MarselleM. R., HartigT., CoxD. T., de BellS., KnappS., LindleyS., … BonnA. (2021). Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework. Environment International, 150, 106420.
43.
McFarlaneB. L. (1994). Specialization and motivations of birdwatchers. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22, 361–370.
44.
MenardoE., BrondinoM., HallR., & PasiniM. (2021). Restorativeness in natural and urban environments: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 124, 417–437.
45.
MethorstJ., RehdanzK., MuellerT., HansjürgensB., BonnA., & Böhning-GaeseK. (2021). The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecological Economics, 181, 106917.
46.
Meyer-GrandbastienA., BurelF., HellierE., & BergerotB. (2020). A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and psychological restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 195, 103728.
47.
MossS. (1995). Birds and weather: A birdwatchers' guide. London, United Kingdom: Hamlyn.
48.
MurawiecS., TryjanowskiP., & NitaA. (2021) An ornithological walk to improve the well-being of mental health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study. Psychiatria, 18, 190–195.
49.
NewmanD. B., TayL., & DienerE. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 555–578.
50.
NghiemT. P. L., WongK. L., JeevanandamL., ChangC. C., TanL. Y. C., GohY., & CarrascoL. R. (2021). Biodiverse urban forests, happy people: Experimental evidence linking perceived biodiversity, restoration, and emotional wellbeing. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 59, 127030.
51.
NorlingJ. C., SibthorpJ., SuchyY., HannonJ. C., & RuddellE. (2010). The benefit of recreational physical activity to restore attentional fatigue: The effects of running intensity level on attention scores. Journal of Leisure Research, 42, 135–152.
52.
OmanS. (2021). Understanding well-being data. Improving social and cultural policy, practice and research. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave, Macmillan, Springer., 383 p.
53.
Parra-SaldívarA., AbadesS., Celis-DiezJ. L., & GelcichS. (2020). Exploring perceived well-being from Urban Parks: Insights from a megacity in Latin America. Sustainability, 12, 7586.
54.
PasanenT. P., OjalaA., TyrväinenL., & KorpelaK. M. (2018). Restoration, well-being, and everyday physical activity in indoor, built outdoor and natural outdoor settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 85–93.
55.
RandlerC. (2021). An analysis of heterogeneity in German speaking birdwatchers reveals three distinct clusters and gender differences. Birds, 2, 250–260.
56.
RandlerC. (2022). Motivations for birdwatching: Support for a three-dimensional model. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, [Epub ahead of print]; DOI 10.1080/10871209.2021.1993385.
57.
RandlerC., & HeilF. (2021). Determinants of bird species literacy—Activity/interest and specialization are more important than socio-demographic variables. Animals, 11, 1595.
58.
RandlerC., HöllwarthA., & SchaalS. (2007). Urban park visitors and their knowledge of animal species. Anthrozoös, 20, 65–74.
59.
RandlerC., & MarxN. (2022). Initial involvement into birding: Triggers, gender, and decade effects—A mixed-methods study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 1–10.
60.
RandlerC., TryjanowskiP., JokimäkiJ., Kaisanlahti-JokimäkiM. L., & StallerN. (2020). SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) Pandemic lockdown influences nature-based recreational activity: The case of birders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 7310.
61.
RandlerC., & WeberV. (2015). Positive and negative affect during the school day and its relationship to morningness–eveningness. Biological Rhythm Research, 46, 683–690.
62.
RatcliffeE., GaterslebenB., & SowdenP. T. (2013). Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 221–228.
63.
RosaC. D., & ColladoS. (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Setting the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 763.
64.
SandiferP. A., Sutton-GrierA. E., & WardB. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services, 12, 1–15.
65.
ScottD., & ShaferC. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 319–343.
66.
SonnentagS., & FritzC. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221.
67.
StevenR., MorrisonC., & CastleyJ. G. (2015). Birdwatching and avitourism: A global review of research into its participant markets, distribution and impacts, highlighting future research priorities to inform sustainable avitourism management. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23, 1257–1276.
68.
UebelK., MarselleM., DeanA. J., RhodesJ. R., & BonnA. (2021). Urban green space soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness. People and Nature, 3, 756–769.
69.
UlrichR. S., SimonsR. F., LositoB. D., FioritoE., MilesM. A., & ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.
70.
Van der MerweP., & SaaymanM. (2008). Travel motivations of tourists visiting Kruger National Park. Koedoe: African Protected Area Conservation and Science, 50, 154–159.
71.
von LindernE., BauerN., FrickJ., HunzikerM., & HartigT. (2013). Occupational engagement as a constraint on restoration during leisure time in forest settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 90–97.
72.
WengP. Y., & ChiangY. C. (2014). Psychological restoration through indoor and outdoor leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 46, 203–217.
73.
WöranB., & ArnbergerA. (2012). Exploring relationships between recreation specialization, restorative environments and mountain hikers' flow experience. Leisure Sciences, 34, 95–114.
74.
WylesK. J., WhiteM. P., HattamC., PahlS., KingH., & AustenM. (2019). Are some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environment and Behavior, 51, 111–143.
75.
YoungC., HofmannM., FreyD., MorettiM., & BauerN. (2020). Psychological restoration in urban gardens related to garden type, biodiversity and garden-related stress. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198, 103777.
