Mounting evidence suggests that exposure to natural environments is associated with more positive body image, but mechanistic pathways are not fully understood. In this study, we tested one such indirect pathway involving positive rational acceptance (PRA) (i.e., an adaptive body image coping strategy). A total of 401 participants from the United Kingdom completed measures of nature exposure, PRA, and body appreciation (i.e., a facet of positive body image). Correlational analyses indicated positive, although weak-to-moderate, associations between all three constructs. Mediation analysis supported the hypothesis that PRA mediates the association between nature exposure and body appreciation. These findings were robust in the total sample, as well as in women (n = 200) and men (n = 197) separately. These results highlight the potential benefit of nature exposure in terms of promoting adaptive body image coping strategies, which in turn are associated with more positive body image.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamA., SommerhalderK., & AbelT. (2010). Landscape and well-being: A scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. International Journal of Public Health, 55, 59–69.
2.
BaileyK. A., LamarcheL., GammageK. L., & SullivanP. J. (2016). Self-objectification and the use of body image coping strategies: The role of shame in high physically active women. American Journal of Psychology, 129, 81–90.
3.
BerryM. S., RepkeM. A., MetcalfA. L., & JordanK. E. (2020). Promoting healthy decision-making via natural environment exposure: Initial evidence and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1682.
4.
BerryM. S., RepkeM. A., NickersonN. P., ConwayL. G., III, OdumA. L., Jordan KE. (2015). Making time for nature: Visual exposure to natural environments lengthens subjective time perception and reduces impulsivity. PLoS One, 10, e0141030.
5.
BratmanG. N., Olvera-AlvarezH. A., & GrossJ. J. (2021). The affective benefits of nature exposure. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15, e12630.
6.
CashT. F., & GrassoK. (2005). The norms and stability of new measures of the multidimensional body image construct. Body Image, 2, 199–203.
7.
CashT. F., SantosM. T., & WilliamsE. F. (2005). Coping with body-image threats and challenges: Validation of the body image coping strategies inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58, 190–199.
8.
CurranP. J., WestS. G., & FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
9.
DhurupM., & NolanV. T. (2014). Body image coping strategies in university students and variations in terms of gender in a developing country. The Anthropologist, 18, 217–225.
10.
FolkmanS., & Lazarus RS. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 466–475.
11.
FredricksonB. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1367–1377.
12.
FrumkinH., BratmanG. N., BreslowS. J., CochranB., KahnJr., P. H. LawlerJ. J., LevinP. S., TandonP. S., VaranasiU., WolfK. L., & WoodS. A. (2017). Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 075001.
13.
GladwellV., & BrownD. (2016). Green exercise in the workplace. In J. Barton, R. Bragg, C. Wood, & J. Pretty (eds.), Green exercise: Linking nature, health, and well-being (pp. 200–211). London: Routledge.
14.
GloriaC. T., & SteinhardtM. A. (2016). Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress and Health, 32, 145–156.
15.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
16.
HenniganK. (2010). Therapeutic potential of time in nature: Implication for body image in women. Ecopsychology, 2, 135–140.
17.
HollandI., DeVilleN. V., BrowningM. H. E. M., BuehlerR. M., HartJ. E., HippJ. A., MitchellR., RakowD. A., SchiffJ. E., WhiteM. P., YinJ., & JamesP. (2021). Measuring nature contact: A narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4092.
18.
HughesE. K., & GulloneE. (2011). Emotion regulation moderates relationships between body image concerns and psychological symptoms. Body Image, 8, 224–231.
19.
JimenezM. P., DeVilleN. V., ElliotE. G., SchiffJ. E., WiltG. E., HartJ. E., & JamesP. (2021). Associations between nature exposure and health: A review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 4790.
20.
KamitsisI., & FrancisA. J. P. (2013). Spirituality mediates the relationship between engagement with nature and psychological wellbeing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 136–143.
21.
KaplanR. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33, 507–542.
22.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
23.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LabibS. M., BrowningM. H., RigolonA., HelbichM., & JamesP. (2021, August 10). Nature's contribution in coping with a pandemic in the 21st century: A narrative review of evidence during COVID-19. EcoEvoRxiv. https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/j2pa8
25.
LiD., MenottiT., DingY., & WellsN. M. (2021). Life course nature exposure and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5146.
26.
LinardonJ., MesserM., LisboaJ., NewtonA., & Fuller-TyszkiewiczM. (2020). Examining the factor structure, sex invariance, and psychometric properties of the body image acceptance and action questionnaire and the functionality appreciation scale. Body Image, 34, 1–9.
27.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
28.
MallinckrodtB., AbrahamW. T., WeiM., & RussellD. W. (2006). Advanced in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378.
29.
MohiyeddiniC. (2017). Repressive coping among British college women: A potential protective factor against body image concerns, drive for thinness, and bulimia symptoms. Body Image, 22, 39–47.
30.
MurdockE. G. (2019). Nature where you're not: Rethinking environmental spaces and racism. In S. M. Meagher, S. Noll, & J. S. Biehl (eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of the city (pp. 301–313). London: Routledge.
31.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
32.
RogersC. B., WebbJ. B., & JafariN. (2018). A systematic review of the roles of body image flexibility as a correlate, moderator, mediator, and in intervention science (2011–2018). Body Image, 27, 43–60.
33.
RygalN., & SwamiV. (2021). Simulated nature and positive body image: A comparison of the impact of exposure to images of blue and green spaces. Body Image. In Press.
34.
SadickA.-M., & KamardeenI. (2020). Enhancing employees' performance and well-being with nature exposure embedded office workplace design. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101789.
35.
SandozE. K., WilsonK. G., MerwinR. M., & KellumK. K. (2013). Assessment of body image flexibility: The Body-Image Acceptance and Action Questionnaire. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2, 39–48.
36.
StiegerS., AichingerI., & SwamiV. (2021). The impact of nature exposure on body image and happiness: An experience sampling study. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2020.1803805
37.
SwamiV. (2020a). Body image benefits of allotment gardening. Ecopsychology, 12, 19–23.
38.
SwamiV. (2020b). Impact of exposure to films of natural and built environments on body image in older adults. In N. Columbus (ed.), The natural environment: Past, present, and future perspectives (in press). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science Publishers
39.
SwamiV. (2020c). How being in nature can promote healthier body image. Relate Insights, 1, 1–10.
40.
SwamiV., BarronD., & FurnhamA. (2018a). Exposure to natural environments, and photographs of natural environments, promotes more positive body image. Body Image, 24, 82–94.
41.
SwamiV., BarronD., HariR., GroverS., SmithL., & FurnhamA. (2019). The nature of positive body image: Examining associations between nature exposure, self-compassion, functionality appreciation, and body appreciation. Ecopsychology, 11, 243–253.
42.
SwamiV., BarronD., ToddJ., HorneG., & FurnhamA. (2020a). Nature exposure and positive body image: (Re-)examining the mediating roles of connectedness to nature and trait mindfulness. Body Image, 34, 201–208.
43.
SwamiV., BarronD., WeisL., & FurnhamA. (2016a). Bodies in nature: Associations between exposure to nature, connectedness to nature, and body image in U.S. adults. Body Image, 18, 153–161.
44.
SwamiV., FurnhamA., HorneG., & StiegerS. (2020b). Taking it apart and putting it back together again: Using Item Pool Visualisation to summarise complex data patterns in (positive) body image research. Body Image, 34, 155–166.
45.
SwamiV., Mohd. KhatibN. A., Vidal-MollónJ., VintilaM., BarronD., GoianC., MayoralO. TohE. K. L., TudorelO., VaziraniS., & ZahariH. S. (2020c). Visits to natural environments improve state body appreciation: Evidence from Malaysia, Romania, and Spain. Ecopsychology, 12, 24–35.
46.
SwamiV., PickeringM., BarronD., & PatelS. (2018b). The impact of exposure to films of natural and built environments on state body appreciation. Body Image, 26, 70–73.
47.
SwamiV., von NordheimL., & BarronD. (2016b). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between connectedness to nature and body appreciation in women, but not men. Body Image, 16, 41–44.
48.
TodD., & EdwardsC. (2015). Relationships among muscle dysmorphia characteristics, body image quality of life, and coping in males. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 18, 585–589.
49.
TylkaT. L. (2018). Overview of the field of positive body image. In E. A Daniels, M. M. Gillen, & C. H. Markey (eds.), Body positive: Understanding and improving body image in science and practice (pp. 6–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
TylkaT. L., & Wood-BarcalowN. L. (2015a). What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image, 14, 118–129.
51.
TylkaT. L., & Wood-BarcalowN. L. (2015b). The body appreciation scale-2: Item refinement and psychometric evaluation. Body Image, 12, 53–67.
52.
WebbJ. B., Butler-AjibadeP., & RobinsonS. A. (2014). Considering an affect regulation framework for examining the association between body dissatisfaction and positive body image in Black older adolescent females: Does body mass index matter?. Body Image, 11, 426–437.
53.
WebbJ., Wood-BarcalowN. L., & TylkaT. (2015). Assessing positive body image: Contemporary approaches and future directions. Body Image, 14, 130–145.
54.
WoodC., BarronD., & SmythN. (2019). The Current and Retrospective Intentional Nature Exposure Scales: Development and factorial validity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 4443.
