A number of studies have demonstrated that contact with nature increases connectedness to nature. The precise psychological process through which this effect occurs, however, has been relatively understudied. We test the role of self-awareness as a mediator of the relationship between contact with nature and connectedness. Participants went on a walk either in nature or in an urban environment, and provided in situ recordings of their thoughts—which were analyzed for self-focused and nature-focused language use—and then completed a measure of explicit connectedness to nature and self-awareness. Results revealed a significant indirect pathway between contact with nature and connectedness through decreased public self-awareness. Thus, results emphasize the importance of considering the effects of contact with nature on self-related processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonD. H., & FultonD. C. (2008). Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: Place attachment relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13, 73–88.
2.
BartonJ., BraggR., PrettyJ., RobertsJ., & WoodyC. (2016). The wilderness expedition: An effective life course intervention to improve young people's well- being and connectedness to nature. Journal of Experiential Education, 39, 59–72.
3.
BentlerP. M., & BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588.
4.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.
5.
BruniC. M., FraserJ., & SchultzP. W. (2008). The value of zoo experiences for connecting people with nature. Visitor Studies, 11, 139–150.
6.
BurbachM. E., PennisiL., WestC. D., & Ziegler-ChongS. (2012). The impact of environmental interpretation in developing a connection to nature in park visitors. LARNet: The Cyber Journal of Applied Leisure and Recreation Research, 15, 1330.
7.
CarverC. S. (2012). Self-awareness. In LearyM. R. & TangneyJ. P. (eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 50–68). New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press.
8.
DaSilveiraA., DeSouzaM. L., & GomesW. B. (2015). Self-consciousness concept and assessment in self-report measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 930.
9.
DavisJ. L., LeB., & CoyA. E. (2011). Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 257–265.
10.
FrantzC., MayerF. S., NortonC., & RockM. (2005). There is no “I” in nature: The influence of self-awareness on connectedness to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 427–436.
11.
GovernJ. M., & MarschL. A. (2001). Development and validation of the situational self-awareness scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 366–378.
12.
HowellA. J., DopkoR. L., PassmoreH. A., & BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.
13.
HuL. T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
14.
KalsE., SchumacherD., & MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202.
15.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
17.
KennyD. A. (2017). MedPower: An interactive tool for the estimation of power in tests of mediation [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://davidakenny.shinyapps.io/MedPower.
18.
LengiezaM. L., SwimJ. K., & HuntC. A. (2021). Effects of post-trip eudaimonic reflections on affect, self-transcendence and Philanthropy. Service Industries Journal, 41, 1–22.
19.
LeopoldA. (1949). The land ethic. A Sand County Almanac: And sketches here and there (pp. 201–226). London: Oxford University Press.
20.
MayerF. S., & FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
21.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
22.
NaessA. (1987). Self-realization: An ecological approach to being in the world. Trumpeter, 4, 35–42.
23.
NisbetE. K., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.
24.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connectedness to nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
25.
PennebakerJ. W., BoothR. J., BoydR. L., & FrancisM. E. (2015) Linguisitc inquiry and word count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
26.
PiffP. K., DietzeP., FeinbergM., StancatoD. M., & KeltnerD. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 883–899.
27.
RichardsonM., & SheffieldD. (2015). Reflective self-attention: A more stable predictor of connection to nature than mindful attention. Ecopsychology, 7, 166–175.
28.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5-12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
29.
RuckerD. D., PreacherK. J., TormalaZ. L., & PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.
30.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
31.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp. 61–78). Boston, MA: Springer.
32.
SchultzP. W., & TabanicoJ. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1219–1247.
33.
TamK. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
34.
VeblenT. (1934). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. (pp. 10–27). New York: Modern Library.
35.
WheatonM., ArdoinN. M., HuntC., SchuhJ. S., KresseM., MenkeC., & DurhamW. (2016). Using web and mobile technology to motivate pro-environmental action after a nature-based tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24, 594–615.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
