In this article we report on an exploratory study that focused on the positive impacts that helping injured animals recover had on the helpers, and these impacts are related to the concept of vicarious resilience. We examined the results of 20 informant interviews to determine how and what they learned from animals and how they incorporated that learning into their lives. The following themes emerged: perspective taking, expansion of sensorial awareness to respond to nonhuman communication, persistence and faith in the animal's resilience, inspiration and hope, patience, and consistency, contributing to something greater than yourself, views on life and death, and compassion fatigue. These themes suggest that some humans learn and grow in important ways from the animals they help to recover from abuse perpetrated by other humans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernsG. (2013). How dogs love us: A neuroscientist and his adopted dog decode the canine brain. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
2.
BerraI. (2014). An evolutionary Ockham's razor to reciprocity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1258.
3.
CorbinJ. M., & StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
4.
DuncanR. (2018). Nature in mind: Systemic thinking and imagination in ecopsychology. London: Routledge.
5.
FigleyC., & RoopR. (2006). Compassion fatigue in the animal-care community. Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.
6.
GriffinD. (2013). Animal minds: Beyond cognition to consciousness. Chicago, CA: University of Chicago Press.
7.
HernándezP., GangseiD., & EngstromD. (2007). Vicarious resilience: A qualitative investigation into a description of a new concept. Family Process, 46, 229–241.
8.
Hernandez-WolfeP. (2018). Vicarious resilience: A comprehensive review. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 66, 9–17.
9.
JalongoM. (2014). Human education and the development of empathy in early childhood: Definitions, rationale and outcomes. In M. Jalongo (ed.), Teaching compassion: Human education in early childhood (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Springer.
10.
KillianK., Hernandez-WolfeP., EngstromD., & GangseiD. (2017). Development of the Vicarious Resilience Scale (VR) in working with trauma survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9, 23–31.
11.
KolbS. M. (2012). Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3, 83–86.
12.
LemieuxL. (2009). Rekindling the waters: The truth about swimming with dolphins. Leicester, United Kingdom: Troubador Publishing.
13.
MaturanaH., & VarelaF. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston, MA: Reidel.
14.
NagasawaM., MitsuiS., EnS., OhtaniN., SakumaY., OnakaT., MogiK, & KikusuiT. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348, 333–336.
15.
O'HaireM., TedeschiP., JenkinsM., BradenS., & RodriguezK. (2019). The impact of human-animal interaction in trauma recovery. In P. Tedeschi & M. A. Jenkins (eds.), Transforming trauma: Resilience and healing through our connections with animals (pp. 15–53). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
16.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
RuleA. & ZhbonovaK. (2014). Guardians of the earth: Teaching children to care for all living things. In M. Jalongo (ed.), Teaching compassion: Human education in early childhood (pp. 197–212). New York, NY: Springer.
18.
RussowL. M. (2002). Ethical implications of the human–animal bond in the laboratory. ILAR Journal, 43, 33–37.
TedeschiP., & JenkinsM. A. (2019). Human trauma and animals: Research developments, models, and practice methods for trauma-informed animal-assisted interventions. In P. Tedeschi & M. A. Jenkins (eds.), Transforming trauma: Resilience and healing through our connections with animals (pp. 1–14). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press (Knowledge Unlatched Open Access Edition).
21.
VarelaF., ThompsonE., & RoschE. (2016). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
VarelaF. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York, NY: Elsevier.
23.
ZengrandL. (2013). Post-traumatic psychological resilience in an ecopsychology perspective. Advance Materials Research, 664, 331–336.
