A key challenge for climate change communication is to find ways to engage the wider public in proenvironmental behaviors and support for climate change mitigation policies, without triggering avoidance or reactive responses. This study reports on the effectiveness of incorporating environmental and climate change themes in short stories. In particular, responses to short stories that have a solution focus were compared with stories that have a catastrophic focus. Readers' reflections (N = 91) were analyzed to determine emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to the stories. Results indicate that stories with a solution focus were more effective in motivating proenvironmental intentions than catastrophic stories. Analysis of textual data indicated that being able to identify with a positive role model who provides examples of proenvironmental behaviors that are easily imitable was inspirational for most readers. Some readers were motivated by catastrophic stories to engage in climate change mitigation behaviors, but many reported feelings of futility and low self-efficacy and “switched off” from catastrophic stories due to their negativity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BadenD. (2013). No more preaching to the converted: Embedding ESD in the Business School curriculum through a service-learning initiative. In AtfieldR. & KempP. (Eds.), Enhancing education for sustainable development in business and management, hospitality, leisure, sport, tourism (Chapter 6). York, UK: Higher Education Academy
2.
BadenD. (2014). Look on the bright side: A comparison of positive and negative role models in business ethics education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 154–170.
3.
BadenD., McIntyreK. E., & HombergF. (2018). The impact of constructive news on affective and behavioral responses. Journalism Studies, 20, 1940–1959.
4.
BadenD., & ParkesC. (2013). Experiential learning: Inspiring the leaders of tomorrow. Journal of Management Development, 32, 295–308.
5.
BlackmoreE., UnderhillR., McQuilkinJ., LeachR., & HolmesT. (2013). Common cause for nature: Values and frames in conservation. Machynlleth, UK: Public Interest Research Centre.
6.
CarpenterC. J. (2019). Cognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43, 1–23.
7.
CarterD. M. (2011). Recognizing the role of positive emotions in fostering environmentally responsible behaviors. Ecopsychology, 3, 65–69.
8.
ChapmanD. A., LickelB., & MarkowitzE. M. (2017). Reassessing emotion in climate change communication. Nature Climate Change, 7, 850–852.
9.
FeldmanL., & HartP. S. (2016). Using political efficacy messages to increase climate activism: The mediating role of emotions. Science Communication, 38, 99–127.
10.
FergusonM. A., & BranscombeN. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 135–142.
11.
HaidtJ. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In KeyesC. L. M. & HaidtJ. (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
HartP. S. (2013). Boomerang effects in risk communication. In ArvaiJ. & RiversL. III (Eds.), Effective risk communication (Chapter 18). London, UK: Routledge
13.
HastingsG., SteadM., & WebbJ. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 961–986.
14.
HornseyM. J., & FieldingK. S. (2016). A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Global Environmental Change, 39, 26–34.
15.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
16.
LevistonZ., PriceJ., & BishopB. (2014). Imagining climate change: The role of implicit associations and affective psychological distancing in climate change responses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 441–454.
17.
LevistonZ., & WalkerI. (2012). Beliefs and denials about climate change: An Australian perspective. Ecopsychology, 4, 277–285.
18.
LorenzoniI., Nicholson-ColeS., & WhitmarshL. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.
19.
LoweT., BrownK., DessaiS., de França DoriaM., HaynesK., & VincentK. (2006). Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 435–457.
20.
MallettR. K., MelchioriK. J., & StrickrothT. (2013). Self-confrontation via a carbon footprint calculator increases guilt and support for a proenvironmental group. Ecopsychology, 5, 9–16.
21.
MoserS. C., & DillingL. (2004). Making climate hot. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 46, 32–46.
22.
MyersT. A., NisbetM. C., MaibachE. W., & LeiserowitzA. A. (2012). A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113, 1105–1112.
23.
OjalaM. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18, 625–642.
24.
O'NeillS., & Nicholson-ColeS. (2009). “Fear won't do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355–379.
25.
O'NeillS. J., BoykoffM., NiemeyerS., & DayS. A. (2013). On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, 23, 413–421.
26.
ReesJ. H., KlugS., & BambergS. (2015). Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130, 439–452.
27.
SlaterM. D., RounerD., & LongM. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235–252.
28.
SmithN., & LeiserowitzA. (2014). The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 34, 937–948.
29.
StevensonK., & PetersonN. (2016). Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding despair among adolescents. Sustainability, 8, doi:10.3390/su8010006
30.
WangS., HurlstoneM. J., LevistonZ., WalkerI., & LawrenceC. (2019). Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230
31.
WangS., LevistonZ., HurlstoneM., LawrenceC., & WalkerI. (2018). Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change. Global Environmental Change, 50, 25–40.
32.
WhitmarshL. (2009). Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13–23.
33.
WhitmarshL., SeyfangG., & O'NeillS. (2011). Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’?. Global Environmental Change, 21, 56–65.
