Due to the multifaceted environmental problems being encountered globally, the need to respect the environment has started gaining momentum. Researchers have identified that the spiritual component in an individual's relationship with nature has not been measured. The concept of ecospirituality was defined using extant literature, and items were generated to measure ecospirituality. To ascertain the measurement scale, a survey was conducted among 527 employees working in various organizations. The data was split into two samples for conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis resulted in five dimensions of ecospirituality, namely, dwelling, caring, revering, experiencing, and relating. Confirmatory factor analysis was done using structural equation modeling to assess the reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. Four models were developed and compared using model fit indices. A second study with 321 respondents was used to validate the ecospirituality scale by comparing it with three other related scales, namely, the Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS), the Environmental Attitude Inventory (EAI), and the Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES). The ecospirituality instrument developed in this paper would aid researchers in measuring ecospirituality and facilitate in testing causal relationships. This would contribute to the existing environmental psychology literature.
AndersonJ. C., & GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
3.
BerryT. (1993). Into the future. In HallF. (Ed.), Earth and spirit: The spiritual dimension of the environmental crisis (pp. 34–41). New York, NY: Continuum.
BrüggerA., KaiserF. G., & RoczenN. (2011). One for all?. European Psychologist, 16, 324–333.
6.
ClaytonS., & OpotowS. (2003). Justice and identity: Changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 298–310.
7.
DavisJ. L., GreenJ. D., & ReedA. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 173–180.
8.
DelaneyC. (2005). The spirituality scale. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 23, 145–167.
DunlapR. E., & JonesR. E. (2003). Environmental attitudes and values. In Fernández-BallesterosR. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 364–369). London, UK: Sage
12.
DunlapR. E., & Van LiereK. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm.”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10–19.
13.
DunlapR. E., Van LiereK. D., MertigA. G., & JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
14.
DutcherD. D., FinleyJ. C., LuloffA. E., & JohnsonJ. B. (2007). Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior, 39, 474–493.
15.
FornellC., & LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, doi:10.2307/3151312
16.
FrancoL. S., ShanahanD. F., FullerR. A., FrancoL. S., ShanahanD. F., & FullerR. A. (2017). A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, doi:10.3390/ijerph14080864
17.
FranssonN., & GarlingT. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369–382.
HofstraN., & HuisinghD. (2014). Eco-innovations characterized: A taxonomic classification of relationships between humans and nature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 459–468.
20.
HolmesG. (2010). Psychology in the real world: Community-based groupwork. Ross-on-Wye, UK: PCCS Books.
21.
HuL.-T., & BentlerP. M. (1999). Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
22.
KalsE., SchumacherD., & MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178–202.
23.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
LincolnV. (2000). Ecospirituality: A pattern that connects. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 18, 227–244.
25.
MaloneyM. P., & WardM. P. (1973). Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 28, 583–586.
26.
MaloneyM. P., WardM. P., & BrauchtG. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30, 787–790.
27.
MayerF. S., & FrantzC. M. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
28.
MilfontT. L., & DuckittJ. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94.
29.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
30.
PascaL., AragonésJ. I., & CoelloM. T. (2017). An analysis of the Connectedness to Nature Scale based on item response theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01330
31.
PerkinsH. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 455–463.
32.
RestallB., & ConradE. (2015). A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264–278.
33.
RevelleW., & ZinbargR. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154.
34.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
35.
SilvasD. V. (2013). Measuring an emotional connection to nature among children (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest LLC. (ERIC Number: ED554155) https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED554155
36.
UnderwoodL. G. (2011). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Overview and results. Religions, 2, 29–50.
37.
UnderwoodL. G., & TeresiJ. A. (2002). The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, theoretical description, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health-related data. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 22–33.
38.
van SchalkwykA. (2011). Sacredness and sustainability: Searching for a practical eco-spirituality. Religion and Theology, 18, 77–92.
