Connecting with nature has been described by some as an important psychological need. Indeed, research shows that a strong connection to nature predicts flourishing across a wide range of well-being indices. Engaging with natural beauty may be one route by which people satisfy this presumed need to connect with nature. Based on this reasoning, the purpose of the current research was to investigate whether nature connectedness mediates the relationship between engagement with natural beauty (i.e., the tendency to notice and be moved by beauty in nature) and well-being in three different cultures. Four cross-sectional surveys involving Canadian, Japanese, and Russian undergraduate students were conducted (N = 1,390). Engagement with natural beauty and nature connectedness were positively associated with a variety of well-being measures. Moreover, we found relatively consistent support for the indirect effect of nature connectedness in explaining the relationship between engagement with natural beauty and well-being. This finding replicated across five different measures and indices of well-being, two different measures of nature connectedness, and three different cultures. Overall, this research suggests that engaging with natural beauty may have an impact on well-being by promoting a stronger subjective connection with nature. Key Words: Engagement with natural beauty—Nature connectedness—Well-being—Meaning—Biophilia.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmbreyC. L., & FlemingC. M. (2011). Valuing scenic amenity using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics, 72, 106–115.
2.
AppletonJ. (1975). The experience of landscape. London: Wiley.
3.
AronA., AronE. N., & SmollenD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
4.
BaumeisterR. F., & LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
5.
BerdyaevN. (2014). The spiritual crisis of the intelligentsia. Portsmouth, NH: Vilnius Press. (Original work published 1910)
6.
CapaldiC. A., DopkoR. L., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 976.
7.
CapaldiC. A., PassmoreH.-A., NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & DopkoR. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5, 1–16.
8.
CervinkaR., RödererK., & HeflerE. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379–388.
9.
ChaadaevP. Y. (1969). Philosophical letters and apology of a madman (ZeldinM.-B., Trans.). Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.
10.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In ClaytonS. & OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
DienerE. (2009). Subjective well-being. In DienerE. (Ed.), The science of well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener Vol. 37 (pp. 11–58). New York: Springer.
12.
DiessnerR., IyerR., SmithM. M., & HaidtJ. (2013). Who engages with moral beauty?. Journal of Moral Education, 42, 139–163.
13.
DiessnerR., SolomR. C., FrostN. K., ParsonsL., & DavidsonJ. (2008). Engagement with beauty: Appreciating natural, artistic, and moral beauty. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142, 303–329.
14.
DiessnerR., WoodwardD., StacyS., & MobasherS. (2015). Ten once-a-week brief beauty walks increase appreciation of natural beauty. Ecopsychology, 7, 126–133.
15.
FredricksonB. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359, 1367–1378.
16.
GintingH., NäringG., KwakkenbosL., & BeckerE. S. (2015). Spirituality and negative emotions in individuals with coronary heart disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 6, 537–545.
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
HenrichJ., HeineS. J., & NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
20.
HepburnR. W. (1966). Contemporary aesthetics and the neglect of natural beauty. In WilliamsB. & MontefloreA. (Eds.), British analytical philosophy (pp. 285–310). London: Routledge.
21.
HofstedeH., HofstedeG. J., & MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
HomeR., HunzikerM., & BauerN. (2012). Psychosocial outcomes as motivations for visiting nearby urban green spaces. Leisure Sciences, 34, 350–365.
23.
HowellA. J., DopkoR. L., PassmoreH.-A., & BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.
24.
HowellA. J., & PassmoreH.-A. (2013). The nature of happiness: Nature affiliation and mental well-being. In KeyesC. L. M. (Ed.), Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health (pp. 231–257). New York: Springer.
25.
HowellA. J., PassmoreH.-A., & BuroK. (2013). Meaning in nature: Meaning in life as a mediator of the relationship between nature connectedness and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1681–1696.
26.
HutaV., & RyanR. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.
27.
HutaV., & WatermanA. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456.
28.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
InglehartR., & WelzelC. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 551–567.
JoyeY., & BolderdijkJ.-W. (2015). An exploratory study into the effects of extraordinary nature on emotions, mood, and prosociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1577.
32.
KahnP. H.Jr. (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children's affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1–61.
33.
KaplanR., & KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
KellertS. R. (1997). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35.
KellertS. R., & WilsonE. O. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
36.
KeyesC. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.
37.
LambertL., PassmoreH.-A., & HolderM. D. (2015). Foundational frameworks of positive psychology: Mapping well-being orientations. Canadian Psychology, 56, 311–321.
38.
LamersS. M. A., WesterhofG. J., BohlmeijerE. T., ten KloosterP. M., & KeyesC. L. M. (2010). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67, 99–110.
39.
LearyM. R., TipsordJ. M., & TateE. M. (2008). Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one's sense of self. In WaymentH. A. & BauerJ. J. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological exploration of the quiet ego (pp. 137–147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
LikhachevD. S. (2013). O russkoj prirode [On the Russian nature]. In Pisma o dobrom [Letters on the kind]. Moscow: Azbuka-Attikus.
41.
LomasT. (2016a). The art of second wave positive psychology: Harnessing Zen aesthetics to explore the dialectics of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6, 14–29.
42.
LomasT. (2016b). Towards a positive cross-cultural lexicography: Enriching our emotional landscape through 216 ‘untranslatable’ words pertaining to well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 546–558.
43.
MacKerronG., & MouratoS. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23, 992–1000.
44.
MagunV. S., & RudnevM. G. (n.d.). Bazovye tsennosti dvukh pokolenii rossiyan i dinamika ikh sotsial'noi determinatsii [Basic values of the two generations of the Russians and the dynamics of their social determination]. Retrieved from http://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Magun_Rudnev_baz_pok.pdf
45.
MartynP., & BrymerE. (2016). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 1436–1445.
46.
MayerF. S., & FrantzC. M. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of individuals' feelings in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 504–515.
47.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
48.
McMahanE. A., & EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.
49.
MenardS. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis: Sage university series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
51.
MurotaY. (1985). Culture and the environment in Japan. Environmental Management, 9, 105–111.
52.
NisbetE. K., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.
53.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
54.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303–322.
55.
OsinE. N., KuznetzovaS. S., & MalyutinaA. M. (2014). Implicitnye koncepcii smysla zhizni i osmyslennoj zhizni [Implicit concepts of meaning in life and meaningful life]. In KarpinskiyK. V. & ChudnovskiyV. E. (Eds.), Psihologija smysla zhizni: metodologicheskie, teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy [The psychology of meaning in life: Methodological, theoretical and applied issues] (pp. 118–138). Grodno, Belarus: Grodno State University.
56.
Ozawa-de SilvaC., Ozawa-de SilvaB., & KeyesC. (2016). Validation of the Japanese Mental Health-Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF). Manuscript in preparation.
PassmoreH.-A., & HolderM. D. (2017). Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week photography intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12, 537–546.
59.
PassmoreH.-A., & HowellA. J. (2014). Eco-existential positive psychology: How experiences in nature can address our existential anxieties and contribute to well-being. The Humanistic Psychologist, 42, 370–388.
60.
PlyusninY. M. (1995). Narodnoe «ekologicheskoe mirovozzrenie»: kon”yunkturnost' i arkhaichnost' [Folk “ecological worldview”: State of affairs and archaism]. In PanovaV. I., & LebedevaV. P. (Eds.), Uchitelyu ob ekologii detstva [To teacher on the ecology of childhood] (pp. 32–36). Moscow: Russian Academy of Education.
61.
PoonK.-T., TengF., ChowJ. T., & ChenZ. (2015). Desiring to connect to nature: The effect of ostracism on ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 116–122.
62.
PoonK.-T., TengF., WongW.-Y., & ChenZ. (2016). When nature heals: Nature exposure moderates the relationship between ostracism and aggression. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 159–168.
63.
PrivetteG. (1983). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361–1368.
64.
PyszczynskiT., SolomonS., & GreenbergJ. (2015). Chapter one—thirty years of terror management theory: From genesis to revelation. In OlsonJ. M. & ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 1–70). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier B.V.
65.
ReisH. T., SheldonK. M., GableS. L., RoscoeJ., & RyanR. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.
66.
RussellR., GuerryA. D., BalvaneraP., GouldR. K., BasurtoX., ChanK. M. A., ⋯ TamJ. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 473–502.
67.
RyanR. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.
68.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
69.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
70.
SabadoshP. A. (2016). Engagement with beauty: Natural, artistic, moral, ideal … how long is the list in Russian?. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 62.
71.
SaitoY. (1983). The aesthetic appreciation of nature: Western and Japanese perspectives and ethical implications (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
72.
SchultzP. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 1–13.
ShepardP. (1982). Nature and madness. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
75.
ShibataS. (2016). Development of the Feelings toward Nature Scale and relationship between feeling toward nature and proximity to nature. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 87, 50–59.
76.
ShiotaM. N., KeltnerD., & MossmanA. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 944–963.
77.
StegerM. F. (2009). Meaning in life. In SnyderC. R. & LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 679–687). New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
StegerM. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life: Optimal functioning at the nexus of well-being, psychopathology, & spirituality. In WongP. T. P. (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (pp. 165–184). New York: Taylor & Francis.
79.
StegerM. F., FrazierP., OishiS., & KalerM. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.
80.
StegerM. F., KawabataY., ShimaiS., & OtakeK. (2008). The meaningful life in Japan and the United States: Levels and correlates of meaning in life. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 660–678.
81.
SteinbergM. (2013). A history of Russia: From Peter the Great to Gorbachev [Audiobook]. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company.
82.
TamK. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
83.
ThomasK. (1983). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England 1500–1800. London: Allen Lane.
84.
TsunetsuguY., ParkB. J., & MiyazakiY. (2010). Trends in research related to “Shinrin-yoku” (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15, 27–37.
85.
UdalovaN. E. (2009). Problema nravstvennogo otnosheniya k prirode v russkoi filosofii serediny XIX–nachala XX vv. v kontekste sovremennoi ekologicheskoi etiki [The issue of moral attitude toward nature in the Russian philosophy of the middle of XIX–beginning of XX centuries in the context of the modern ecological ethics] (Doctoral dissertation). Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia.
86.
UlrichR. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In KellertS. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington, DC: Island Press.
87.
UlrichR. S., SimonsR. F., LositoB. D., FioritoE., MilesM. A., & ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.
88.
ViningJ., MerrickM. S., & PriceE. A. (2008). The distinction between humans and nature: Human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Human Ecology Review, 15, 1–11.
89.
WatanabeH. (1973). The conception of nature in Japanese culture. Science, 183, 279–282.
90.
WatsonD., ClarkL. A., & TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
91.
WilliamsK., & HarveyD. (2001). Transcendent experience in forest environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 239–260.
92.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
93.
WhiteL.Jr. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.
94.
WolskoC., & LindbergK. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5, 80–91.
ZaharchenkoT. R. (1990). Environmental policy in the Soviet Union. Environs: Environmental Law & Policy Journal, 14, 3–6.
97.
ZelenskiJ. M., & NisbetE. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment & Behavior, 46, 3–23.
98.
Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM., PiotrowskiJ., OsinE. N., CieciuchJ., AdamsB. G., ArdiR., ⋯ MaltbyJ. (2016). Mental Health Continuum—Short Form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
99.
ZhangJ. W., HowellR. T., & IyerR. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55–63.
100.
ZhangJ. W., PiffP. K., IyerR., KolevaS., & KeltnerD. (2014). An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 61–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
