Evidence suggests that gardening can have a positive impact on the health and well-being of people experiencing mental health difficulties. There is currently a lack of research exploring the potential public health benefits of gardening among nonclinical populations. Therefore, the aims of this paper were to explore the relationship between allotment gardening and well-being from the suburban allotment-holder's perspective. Six suburban allotment gardeners were interviewed to elicit their personal experiences of allotment gardening and its impact on their well-being. Transcripts were subjected to interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) with seven main themes emerging: fundamental importance of growing and valuing food; physical and mental protection; feeling connected to people, place, and time; pride, mastery, and control; pleasure of being in nature; problem solving, learning, and accepting; acting on values. Parallels were drawn between these themes and psychological models of well-being and motivation. The research suggests that allotments are flexible environments that may enable people to meet a wide range of individual needs, enhancing well-being. They may be a particularly valuable resource for the promotion of well-being in urban and suburban areas, where people may feel detached from nature and a sense of community. Key Words: Well-being—Allotments—Community gardens—Hierarchy of needs—Health promotion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsD. (2010). Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 56: Processes of prejudice: Theory, evidence and intervention. Manchester, UK: Equality and Human Rights Commission.
2.
ActonL. (2011). Allotment gardens: A reflection of history, heritage, community and self. Papers From the Institute of Archaeology, 21, 46–58.
3.
BurlsA. (2007). People and green spaces: Promoting public health and mental well-being through ecotherapy. Journal of Public Mental Health, 6, 24–39.
4.
ChalquistC. (2009). A look at the ecotherapy research evidence. Ecopsychology, 1, 64–74.
5.
ChiesaA., & SerrettiA. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15, 593–600.
6.
ClatworthyJ., HindsJ., & CamicP. M. (2013). Gardening as a mental health intervention: A review. Mental Health Review Journal, 18, 214–225.
7.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
8.
Department of Health. (2010). Healthy lives, healthy people: Our strategy for public health in England. London: Department of Health.
9.
Department of Health. (2011). No health without mental health: A cross government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: Department of Health.
10.
DunnA. L., & JewellJ. S. (2010). The effect of exercise on mental health. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 9, 202–207.
11.
ElliottR., FischerC. T., & RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
12.
FischerC. T. (2009). Bracketing in qualitative research: Conceptual and practical matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 583–590.
13.
GenterC., RobertsA., RichardsonJ., & SheaffM. (2015). The contribution of allotment gardening to health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 593–605.
14.
GilbertN. (2016). Green space: A natural high. Nature, 531, S56–S57.
15.
HartigT., MitchellR., de VriesS., & FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228.
16.
HerbertJ. D., FormanE. M., & EnglandE. L. (2009). Psychological acceptance. In O'DonohueW. & FisherJ. E. (Eds.), General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
17.
HindsJ., & SparksP. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109–120.
18.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 169–182.
19.
KingsleyJ. Y., TownsendM., & Henderson-WilsonC. (2009). Cultivating health and wellbeing: Members' perceptions of the health benefits of a Port Melbourne community garden. Leisure Studies, 28, 207–219.
20.
Koltko-RiveraM. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10, 302–317.
21.
MaslowA. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
22.
MensahC. A., AndresL., PereraU., & RojiA. (2016). Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: A systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6, 142–163.
23.
Mental Health Taskforce. (2016). The five year forward view for mental health: A report from the independent Mental Health Taskforce to the NHS in England. London: NHS England.
24.
MooredG. (2006). Uniting a city: Facilitating interracial interactions and cultural exchange in urban public spaces, with applications to Washington, D.C. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 17, 130–150.
25.
NICE. (2009). The treatment and management of depression in adults: Clinical guideline CG90. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
26.
PartridgeJ. (2010). The psychological benefits of gardening. Clinical Psychology Forum, 211, 38–41.
27.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
28.
RyffC. D., & SingerB. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39.
29.
ShinewK. J., GloverT. D., & ParryD. C. (2004). Leisure spaces as potential sites for interracial interaction: Community gardens in urban areas. Journal of Leisure Research, 36, 336–355.
30.
SmithJ. A., FlowersP., & LarkinM. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage.
31.
SulsJ., & WheelerL. (2012). Social comparison theory. In Van LangeP., KruglanskiA. & HiggingsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. London: Sage Publications.
32.
ThoitsP. A., & HewittL. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 115–131.
33.
WardD., & LasenM. (2009). An overview of needs theories behind consumerism. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 4, 137–155.
34.
WebberJ., HindsJ., & CamicP. M. (2015). The well-being of allotment gardeners: A mixed methodological study. Ecopsychology, 7, 20–28.
35.
WilliamsE. N., & MorrowS. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 576–582.
36.
WilsonE. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
World Health Organisation. (2016). Global report on urban health: Equitable, healthier cities for sustainable development. Geneva: WHO Press.
38.
YardleyL. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
