The present study examined the impact of virtual reality experience of an urban versus a natural environment on affect and restorativeness. Participants were randomly assigned to experience a natural environment through 360-degree interactive virtual reality or an urban environment through 360-degree interactive virtual reality. Virtual reality experience of a natural environment compared to virtual reality experience of an urban environment resulted in higher levels of positive affect and a greater perception of restorativeness. Restorativeness was a mediating path between virtual reality experience of a natural or urban environment and positive affect. Trait connectedness to nature showed a trend toward interacting with experience of a natural or urban environment's impact on positive affect. Virtual reality technology may have the potential to enhance well-being. Key Words: Affect—Nature—Restorativeness—Urban—Virtual reality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonP. L., PriceM., EdwardsS. M., ObasajuM. A., SchmertzS. K., ZimandE., & CalamarasM. R. (2013). Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81, 751–760.
2.
AnnerstedtM., JönssonP., WallergårdM., JohanssonG., KarlsonB., GrahnP., & WährborgP. (2013). Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest: Results from a pilot study. Physiology & Behavior, 118, 240–250.
3.
BermanM. G., KrossE., KrpanK. M., AskrenM. K., BursonA., DeldinP. J., & JonidesJ. (2012). Interacting with nature improves cognition and affect for individuals with depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 140, 300–305.
4.
BertoR. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 394–409.
5.
BissonnetteJ., DubéF., ProvencherM.D., Moreno SalaM.T. (2015). Virtual reality exposure training for musicians: Its effect on performance anxiety and quality. Medical Problems of Performing Artists, 30, 169–177.
6.
CapaldiC. A., DopkoR. L., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
7.
CapaldiC. A., PassmoreH. A., NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & DopkoR. L. (2015). Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. International Journal of Wellbeing, 5, doi:10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449
8.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
9.
HartigT., EvansG. W., JamnerL. D., DavisD. S., & GärlingT. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–123.
10.
HartigT., KorpelaK., EvansG. W., & GärlingT. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175–194.
11.
HartigT., MangM., & EvansG. W. (1991) Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3–26.
12.
HartigT., MitchellR., De VriesS., & FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228.
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
14.
HerreroR., Garcia-PalaciosA., CastillaD., MolinariG., & BotellaC. (2014). Virtual reality for the induction of positive emotions in the treatment of fibromyalgia: A pilot study over acceptability, satisfaction, and the effect of virtual reality on mood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 379–384.
15.
KahnP. H.Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
KahnP. H.Jr., FriedmanB., GillB., HagmanJ., SeversonR. L., FreierN. G., FeldmanE. N., CarrèreS., & StolyarA. (2008). A plasma display window?—The shifting baseline problem in a technologically mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 192–199.
17.
KahnP. H.Jr., SeversonR. L., & RuckertJ. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 37–42.
18.
KorpelaK. M., StengårdE., & JussilaP. (2016). Nature walks as a part of therapeutic intervention for depression. Ecopsychology, 8, 8–15.
19.
MayerF. S., & FrantzC. M. (2004). The Connectedness to Nature Scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
20.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
McMahanE. A., & EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.
23.
NieuwenhuijsenM. J., KruizeH., GidlowC., AndrusaityteS., AntóJ. M., BasagañaX., & GarciaJ. (2014). Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): A study programme protocol. BMJ Open, 4, doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004951
24.
PassmoreH. A., & HolderM. D. (2016). Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week intervention. The Journal of Positive Psychology. Early online preprint at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1221126
25.
PriceM., MehtaN., ToneE. B., & AndersonP. L. (2011). Does engagement with exposure yield better outcomes? Components of presence as a predictor of treatment response for virtual reality exposure therapy for social phobia. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 763–770.
TabachnickB. G., & FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
TakayamaN., KorpelaK., LeeJ., MorikawaT., TsunetsuguY., ParkB. J., & KagawaT. (2014). Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 7207–7230.
29.
Triguero-MasM., DadvandP., CirachM., MartínezD., MedinaA., MompartA., & NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2015). Natural outdoor environments and mental and physical health: Relationships and mechanisms. Environment International, 77, 35–41.
30.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery. Science, 224, 420–421.
31.
WatsonD., ClarkL. A., & TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
