Though William James was not an ecologist, his intellectual contributions are rich in implications for an informed philosophy of ecology. James repeatedly called attention to the importance of relations, diversity, intimacy, and the idea that everything that is genuinely real exists in an environment of other things. One of the more challenging contemporary tasks is the development of an overarching philosophical orientation that encourages ecological attitudes and studies. James's psychology and philosophy are uniquely situated to help with this task. The present work investigates ecological implications of James's pragmatism, pluralism, meliorism, and his views on the self and the world. Key Words: William James—Ecology—Ecopsychology—Environmental psychology—Relations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartlettA. A. (2002). Arithmetic, population, and energy [Videotape]. Available from Department of Information Technology Services, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO.
2.
BuzzellL., & ChalquistC. (2015). Ecopsychology and the long emergency: Fostering sanity as the world goes crazy. Ecopsychology, 7, 183–184.
3.
CartrightN. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ClarkeS. (1998). Metaphysics and the disunity of scientific knowledge. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
5.
CookT. (2016). How to feed 11 billion people: Addressing the 21st century's biggest challenge. Earth, 61, 80–87.
6.
CrosbyD. A. (1996). Experience as reality: The ecological metaphysics of William James. In CrosbyD. A. & HardwickC. D. (Eds.), Religious experience and ecological responsibility (pp. 67–87). New York: Peter Lang.
7.
EdeyA. (1998). Solviva: How to grow $500,000 on one acre & peace on earth. Martha's Vineyard, MA: Trailblazer Press.
8.
EhrlichP. R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.
9.
ForbesM. S.Jr. (1992). Fact and comment. Forbes, 149, 25–26.
10.
FurchtL., & HoffmanW. (2008). The stem cell dilemma. New York: Arcade Publishing.
11.
GleiserM. (2015). Unification. In BrockmanJohn (Ed.), This idea must die (pp. 5–8). New York: Harper Perennial.
HeftH. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
HogueM. S. (2010). Aesthetics: The art of ecological responsibility. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 31, 136–146.
15.
JamesH. (Ed.). (1920). Letters of William James (Vol. 2). Boston, MA: The Atlantic Monthly Press. (Original work published 1883)
16.
JamesW. (1975). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1907)
17.
JamesW. (1976). Essays in Radical Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1912)
18.
JamesW. (1977). A Pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1909)
19.
JamesW. (1979). The will to believe: And other essays in popular philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1897)
20.
JamesW. (1981). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
21.
JamesW. (1985). The varieties of religious experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1902)
22.
JamesW. (1996). Some problems of philosophy. Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1911)
23.
JordanM. (2009). Nature and self—An ambivalent attachment?. Ecopsychology, 1, 26–31.
24.
KahnP. H.Jr. (2013). The next phase of Ecopsychology: Ideas and directions. Ecopsychology, 5, 163–166.
25.
KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (2012). Introduction. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
KellerD. R. (2010). Environmental ethics: The big questions. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
LloydS. (2015). “The Universe.” In BrockmanJ. B. (Ed.), This idea must die (pp. 11–14). New York: Harper Perennial.
NorwoodF. B., OltenacuP. A., Calvo-LorenzoM. S., & LancasterS. (2015). Agricultural and food controversies: What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
PerlussB. (2010). Review of Edge of the sacred: Jung, psyche, and earth by David Tracey. Ecopsychology, 2, 47–49.
31.
RandallR. (2012). What is nature? Comments on the special section “Depth psychology and ecopsychology.”. Ecopsychology, 4, 169–171.
32.
RollinB. (1995). Farm animal welfare. Aims, IA: Iowa State University Press.
33.
RollinB. (2006). Animal rights and human morality (3rd ed.). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
34.
RollinB. (2011). Putting the horse before Descartes: My life's work on behalf of animals. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35.
RolstonH.III. (2011). A new environmental ethics: The next millennium for life on earth. New York: Routledge.
36.
RoszakT. (1992). The voice of the earth. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
SingerP. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Harper.
38.
SmithJ. L., LyonsG., & MooreE. (1998). Global meltdown: Immigration, multiculturalism, and national breakdown in the new world order. Westport, CN: Praeger.
39.
SnellT. L., SimmondsJ. G., & WebsterR. S. (2011). Spirituality in the work of Theodore Roszak: Implications for contemporary ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 3, 105–113.
40.
TamK.-P. (2015). Mind attribution to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Ecopsychology, 7, 87–95.
41.
ThompsonP. (1998). Agricultural ethics: Research, teaching, and public policy. Aims, IA: Iowa State University Press.
42.
WigginsB. J., WendtD. C., & OstensonJ. A. (2014). A pluralistic ecopsychology: Embracing the tension between traditions and trends. Ecopsychology, 6, 5–7.
43.
WimberleyE. T., & PellegrinoS. (2013). The relationship between integral ecology and the pragmatic method of William James. The International Journal of Science in Society, 4, 55–70.
44.
ZimdahlR. L. (2012). Agriculture's ethical horizon (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
