Although landfills are being converted into green spaces, little is known about how such areas affect mood, cognition, and physiology. Using a within-subject experimental design (n = 31 men), we found that walking through a naturalized landfill improved mood more than did walking through an adjacent urban area. Both walks improved energy and attentional control and decreased concentrations of cortisol (a marker of stress). One's sense of connectedness with nature moderated the effects of the walks on mood: For men reporting high nature connectedness, mood improved after both walks. For men reporting low nature connectedness, positive mood increased after the naturalized landfill walk and decreased after the urban walk. Follow-up analyses indicated that differential perceptual attentiveness to subtle natural or green features may explain this moderation. Thus, naturalized landfills may enhance the benefits of walking on mood, and nature connectedness may buffer against the harmful effects of urbanization. Key Words: Nature—Restoration—Green space—Mood—Well-being—Brownfields.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlcockI., WhiteM. P., WheelerB. W., FlemingL. E., & DepledgeM. H. (2014). Longitudinal effects on mental health of moving to greener and less green urban areas. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 1247–1255.
2.
AlvarezJ. A., & EmoryE. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 17–42.
3.
ArcherJ. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.
4.
BackhouseS. H., EkkekakisP., BiddleS. J., EkkekakisP., FoskettA., & WilliamsC. (2007). Exercise makes people feel better but people are inactive: Paradox or artefact?. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 498–517.
5.
BartonJ., & PrettyJ. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3947–3955.
6.
BeilK., & HanesD. (2013). The influence of urban natural and built environments on physiological and psychological measures of stress—A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 1250–1267.
7.
BenazonN. (1995). Soil remediation: A practical overview of Canadian cleanup strategies and commercially available technology. Hazardous Materials Management, 7, 10–26.
8.
BergerB. G., & MotlR. W. (2000). Exercise and mood: A selective review and synthesis of research employing the profile of mood states. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 12, 69–92.
9.
BermanM. G., JonidesJ., & KaplanS. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19, 1207–1212.
10.
BeuteF., & de KortY. A. W. (2014). Salutogenic effects of the environment: Review of health protective effects of nature and daylight. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 6, 67–95.
11.
BowlerD. E., Buyung-AliL. M., KnightT. M., & PullinA. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.
12.
BratmanG. N., DailyG. C., LevyB. J., & GrossJ. J. (2015). The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 138, 41–50.
13.
BratmanG. N., HamiltonJ. P., & DailyG. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118–136.
14.
CapaldiC. A., DopkoR. L., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15.
15.
ChangY. K., LabbanJ. D., GapinJ. I., & EtnierJ. L. (2012). The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Brain Research, 1453, 87–101.
16.
De SousaC. A. (2003). Turning brownfields into green space in the city of Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 181–198.
17.
De SousaC. A. (2006). Unearthing the benefits of brownfield to green space projects: An examination of project use and quality of life impacts. Local Environment, 11, 577–600.
18.
De SousaC. A. (2014). The greening of urban post-industrial landscapes: Past practices and emerging trends. Local Environment, 19, 1049–1067.
19.
Department for Environment Transport and the Regions. (1998). Derelict land surveys in 1988 and 1993. London: Department for Environment Transport and the Regions.
20.
DixonI. K. (2014). The transformation of landfills to green spaces: Identifying the barriers and benefits in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.
21.
DyeC. (2008). Health and urban living. Science, 319, 766–769.
22.
FrancisG., NeathI., & Van HornD. (2004). CogLab on a CD, 2.0. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
23.
FrantzC., MayerF. S., NortonC., & RockM. (2005). There is no “I” in nature: The influence of self-awareness on connectedness to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 427–436.
24.
GaterslebenB., & AndrewsM. (2013). When walking in nature is not restorative—The role of prospect and refuge. Health and Place, 20, 91–101.
25.
GidlowC. J., JonesM. V., HurstG., MastersonD., Clark-CarterD., TarvainenM. P., NieuwenhuijsenM. (2016). Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 22–29.
26.
HamerM., TaylorA., & SteptoeA. (2006). The effect of acute aerobic exercise on stress related blood pressure responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 71, 183–190.
27.
HonoldJ., LakesT., BeyerR., & van der MeerE. (2015). Restoration in urban spaces: Nature views from home, greenways, and public parks. Environment and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013916514568556
28.
JuddC. M., KennyD. A., & McClellandG. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134.
29.
KaplanS. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.
30.
KellyB. D., O'CallaghanE., WaddingtonJ. L., FeeneyL., BrowneS., ScullyP. J., … LarkinC. (2010). Schizophrenia and the city: A review of literature and prospective study of psychosis and urbanicity in Ireland. Schizophrenia Research, 116, 75–89.
31.
KillgoreW. D. S. (1998). The Affect Grid: A moderately valid, nonspecific measure of pleasure and arousal. Psychological Reports, 83, 639–642.
32.
LederbogenF., KirschP., HaddadL., StreitF., TostH., SchuchP., … Meyer-LindenbergA. (2011). City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature, 474, 498–501.
33.
LeeK. & AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358.
34.
MacleodC. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2008). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
37.
McCormickC. M., LewisE., SomleyB., & KahanT.A. (2007) Individual differences in cortisol and performance on a test of executive function in men and women. Physiology and Behavior, 91, 87–94.
38.
McGrathJ., SahaS., WelhamJ., El SaadiO., MacCauleyC., & ChantD. (2004). A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: The distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology. BMC Medicine, 2, doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-13
39.
McMahanE. A., & EstesD. (2015). The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative affect: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10, 507–519.
40.
MitchellR., & PophamF. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. Lancet, 372, 1655–1660.
41.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. M., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740.
42.
NisbetE. K., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.
43.
ParkS., & MattsonR. H. (2009). Therapeutic influences of plants in hospital rooms on surgical recovery. HortScience, 44, 102–105.
44.
PedersenC. B., & MortensenP. B. (2001). Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 1039–1046.
45.
PeenJ., SchoeversR. A., BeekmanA. T., & DekkerJ. (2010). The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121, 84–93.
46.
PergamsO. R. W., & ZaradicP. A. (2008). Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 2295–2300.
47.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147.
48.
RobinsonJ. P., & GodbeyG. (1999). Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time (2nd ed.). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
49.
RoeJ. J., ThompsonC. W., AspinallP. A., BrewerM. J., DuffE. I., MillerD., … ClowA. (2013). Green space and stress: Evidence from cortisol measures in deprived urban communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 4086–4103.
50.
RussellJ. A., WeissA., & MendelsohnG. A. (1989). Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502.
51.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
52.
SimonsR. A. (1998). How many urban brownfields are out there? An economic base contraction analysis of 31 U.S. cities. Public Works Management & Policy, 2, 267–273.
53.
SparksP., HindsJ., CurnockS., & PaveyL. (2014). Connectedness and its consequences: A study of relationships with the natural environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 166–174.
54.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
55.
TakanoT., NakamuraK., & WatanabeM. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens' longevity in megacity areas: The importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 913–918.
56.
TakayamaN., KorpelaK., LeeJ., MorikawaT., TsunetsuguY., ParkB. J., … KagawaT. (2014). Emotional, restorative and vitalizing effects of forest and urban environments at four sites in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 7207–7230.
57.
Thompson CoonJ., BoddyK., SteinK., WhearR., BartonJ., & DepledgeM. H. (2011). Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity outdoors? A systemic review. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 1761–1772.
58.
UlrichR. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556.
59.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.
60.
UlrichR. S., SimonsR. F., LositoB. D., FioritoE., MilesM. A., & ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.
61.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. New York: United Nations.
62.
US Environmental Protection Agency. (1989). Report to Congress on indoor air quality: Volume II: Assessment and control of indoor air pollution. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
van der WalA. J., SchadeH. M., KrabbendamL., & Van VugtM. (2013). Do natural landscapes reduce future discounting in humans?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 280, doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2295
65.
vanOs, J., KenisG., & RuttenB. P. F. (2010). The environment and schizophrenia. Nature, 468, 203–212.
66.
WhiteM., SmithA., HumphryesK., PahlS., SnellingD., & DepledgeM. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 482–493.
67.
WhiteM. P., AlcockI., WheelerB. W., & DepledgeM. H. (2013). Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science, 24, 920–928.
68.
WingfieldJ. C., HegnerR. E., DuftyA. M., & BallG. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
