This paper discusses the survival plight of persons who have developed sensitivities to chemicals and/or electromagnetic exposures during the current highly polluted and corporate-driven period in history. I describe the condition known as environmental sensitivities, its prevalence, symptoms, and life impacts, giving attention to medical care, housing, employment, and quality of life. I also discuss special efforts by persons with the condition to continue to function in a culture that offers them little access and then contextualize the problem within ecopsychology. Key Words: Ecopsychology—Environmental health—Overconsumption—Values—Indigenous worldviews.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenheadD. (2008, February29). James Lovelock: ‘Enjoy life while you can: In 20 years global warming will hit the fan.’. The Guardian.
2.
AshfordN. A., & MillerC. S. (1998). Chemical exposures: Low levels, high stakes. New York: Wiley.
3.
BergN. D., LinnegargA., DirksenA., & ElberlingJ. (2008). Prevalence of self-reported symptoms and consequences related to inhalation of airborne chemicals in a Danish population. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81, 881–887.
4.
BlochR. M., & MeggsW. J. (2007). Comorbidity patterns of self-reported chemical sensitivity, allergy, and other medical illnesses with anxiety and depression. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, 16, 136–148.
5.
CaressS., & SteinemannA. (2003). A review of a two-phase population study of multiple chemical sensitivities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 1490–1497.
6.
CaressS., & SteinemannA. (2009). Prevalence of fragrance sensitivity in the American population. Journal of Environmental Health, 71, 46–50.
7.
CarlssonF., KarlsonB., ØrbaekP., ÖsterbergK., & ÖstergrenP.-O. (2005). Prevalence of annoyance attributed to electrical equipment and smells in a Swedish population, and relationship with subjective health and daily functioning. Public Health, 119, 568–577.
8.
ChircopA., & KeddyB. (2003). Women living with environmental illness. Health Care for Women International, 24, 371–383.
9.
ConnS. A. (1995). When the earth hurts, who responds? In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 156–171). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
10.
CooperC. (2007). Multiple chemical sensitivity in the clinical setting: Although the cause and diagnosis of this condition remain controversial, the patient's concerns should be heeded. American Journal of Nursing, 107, 40–47.
11.
DoironN. (2007). People with environmental sensitivities: Life, identity, and services (Doctoral thesis in social work). University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
12.
DurningA. T. (1995). Are we happy yet? In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 68–76). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
13.
EvansJ. (2010). Chemical and electrical hypersensitivity: A sufferer's memoir. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
14.
FisherA. (2012). What is ecopsychology? A radical view. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 79–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
FrumkinH. (2012). Building the science base: Ecopsychology meets clinical epidemiology. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 141–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
GibsonP. R. (2006). Multiple chemical sensitivity: A survival guide. Churchville, VA: Earthrive Books.
17.
GibsonP. R. (2009). Chemical and electromagnetic exposures as disability barriers: Environmental sensitivity. Disability & Society, 24, 187–199.
18.
GibsonP. R. (2010). Of the world but not in it: Barriers to community access and education for persons with environmental sensitivities. Health Care for Women International, 31, 3–16.
19.
GibsonP. R. (2014). Life indicators, illness characteristics, and psychosocial concomitants of self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity: A two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4, 204–216.
20.
GibsonP. R., CheavensJ., & WarrenM. L. (1996). Multiple chemical sensitivity/environmental illness and life disruption. Women & Therapy, 19, 63–79.
21.
GibsonP. R., CheavensJ., & WarrenM. L. (1998). Social support in persons with self-reported sensitivity to chemicals. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 103–115.
22.
GibsonP. R., ElmsA. N. M., & RudingL. A. (2003). Perceived treatment efficacy for conventional and alternative therapies reported by persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 1498–1504.
23.
GibsonP. R., KovachS., & LupferA. (2015). Unmet healthcare needs for persons with environmental sensitivity. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 8, 59–66.
24.
GibsonP. R., & LindbergA. (2007). Work accommodation for people with multiple chemical sensitivity. Disability & Society, 22, 717–732.
25.
GibsonP. R., PlacekE., LaneJ., BrohimerS. O., & LovelaceA. C. E. (2005). Disability induced identity changes in persons with multiple chemical sensitivity. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 502–524.
26.
GibsonP. R., SleddL. G., McEnroeW. H., & VosA. P. (2011). Isolation and lack of access in multiple chemical sensitivity: A qualitative study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 13, 232–237.
27.
GibsonP. R., SuwalS., & SleddL. G. (2009). Services requested and received by consumers with chemical sensitivities at the Centers for Independent Living. Disability Studies Quarterly, 29, 10.
28.
GibsonP. R., & VogelV. M. (2009). Sickness related dysfunction in persons with self-reported multiple chemical sensitivity at four levels of severity. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 72–81.
29.
GreenwayR. (1995). The wilderness effect and ecopsychology. In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 122–135). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
30.
HausteinerC., BornscheinS., HansenJ., ZilkerT., & FörstlH. (2005). Self-reported chemical sensitivity in Germany: A population-based survey. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208, 271–278.
31.
HojoS., IshikawaS., KumanoH., MiyataM., & SakabeK. (2007). Clinical characteristics of physician-diagnosed patients with multiple chemical sensitivity in Japan. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 211, 682–689.
32.
ImaiN., ImaiY., & KidoY. (2008). Psychosocial factors that aggravate the symptoms of sick house syndrome in Japan. Nursing and Health Sciences, 10, 101–109.
33.
JensenD. (2004). A language older than words. White River Junction, VT: Chealsea Green Publishing.
34.
JohanssonÅ., BrämersonA., MillqvistE., NordinS., & BendeM. (2005). Prevalence and risk factors for self-reported odour intolerance: The Skövde population-based study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 78, 559–564.
35.
JohnsonA. (2008). Amputated lives: Coping with chemical sensitivity. Brunswick, ME: Cumberland Press.
36.
JohnsonA. (Producer). (2013). Multiple chemical sensitivity: A life-altering condition [DVD]. USA: CinéVision Productions.
37.
JohnsonA., & StarzmanR. (2000). Gulf War syndrome: Aftermath of a toxic battlefield [Motion picture]. Brunswick, ME: Alison Johnson/Richard Startzman.
38.
KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (2012a). Introduction to Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (2012b). Afterword. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 309–321). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
KannerA. D., & GomesM. E. (1995). The all-consuming self. In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 77–91). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
41.
KaterndahlD. A., BellI. R., PalmerR. F., & MillerC. S. (2012). Chemical intolerance in primary care settings: Prevalence, comorbidity, and outcomes. Annals of Family Medicine, 10, 357–365.
42.
KidnerD. W. (1994). Why psychology is mute about the environmental crisis. Environmental Ethics, 16, 359–376.
43.
KuntslerJ. H. (2005). The long emergency: Surviving the end of oil, climate change, and other converging catastrophes in the twenty-first century. New York: Grove Press.
44.
LarssonC., & MartenssonL. (2009). Experiences of problems in individuals with hypersensitivity to odours and chemicals. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 737–744.
45.
LipsonJ. G. (2004). Multiple chemical sensitivities: Stigma and social experiences. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18, 200–213.
46.
McCormickG. (2001). Living with multiple chemical sensitivity; Narratives of coping. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
47.
MeggsW. J., DunnK. A., BlochR. M., GoodmanP. E., & DavidoffA. L. (1996). Prevalence and nature of allergy and chemical sensitivity in a general population. Archives of Environmental Health, 51, 275–282.
48.
MetznerR. (1995). The psychopathology of the human-nature relationship. In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 55–67). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
49.
RandolphT. G., & MossR. W. (1982). An alternative approach to allergies. New York: Harper & Row.
50.
SeawallL. (1995). The skill of ecological perception. In RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 201–215). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
51.
ShepardP. (1995). Nature and madness. RoszakT., GomesM. E. & KannerA. D. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Restoring the earth, healing the mind (pp. 21–40). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
52.
SpencerT., & SchurP. (2008). The challenge of multiple chemical sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Health, 70, 24–27.
53.
VierstraC. V., RumrillP. D., KochL. C., & McMahonB. T. (2007). Multiple chemical sensitivity and workplace discrimination: The national EEOC ADA research project. Work, 28, 391–402.
54.
ZwillingerR. (1997). The dispossessed: Living with multiple chemical sensitivities. Paulden, AZ: The Dispossessed Project.
