There is much to be gained from understanding the individual differences that predict our connection to nature, as those that are more connected tend to be more caring toward the environment and benefit from better well-being. Study 1 (n = 137) found that reflective self-attention and mindful attention significantly predicted connection to nature, while anxious self-attention had a borderline significant negative association. With the introduction of personality measures, Study 2 (n = 161) found that reflective self-attention and openness had a stronger relationship to nature connection than mindful attention. Study 3 (n = 99) found reflective self-attention, rather than mindful attention, to be associated with an increase in connection to nature. A pre-reflective and intentional self-attention account of nature connectedness is proposed, with intentional self-reflection being a stronger factor than mindful attention. Key Words: Connectedness to nature—Self-attention—Mindfulness—Personality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambrose-OjiB. (2013). Mindfulness practice in woods and forests: An evidence review. Research Report for The Mersey Forest, Forest Research. Alice Holt Lodge Farnham, Surrey, UK.
2.
AndersonN. D., LauM. A., SegalZ. V., & BishopS. R. (2007). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and attentional control. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14, 449–463.
3.
BaiH., & ScuttG. (2009). Touching the Earth with the heart of enlightened mind: The Buddhist practice of mindfulness for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 92–106.
4.
BarnoskyA. D., MatzkeN., TomiyaS., WoganG. O .U., SwartzB., QuentalT. B., MarshallC., McGuireJ. L., LindseyE. L., MaguireK. C., MerseyB., & FerrerE. A. (2011). Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived?. Nature, 471, 51–57.
5.
BertoR. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259.
6.
BraggE. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93–108.
7.
BrownK. W., & RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.
8.
BrownK. W., RyanR. M., & CreswellJ. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 211–237.
9.
CapaldiC. A., DopkoR. L., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976
10.
CervinkaR., RödererK., & HeflerE. (2012). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379–388.
11.
CostaP. T., & McCraeR. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
HartigT., van den BergA. E., HagerhallC. M., TomalakM., BauerN., HansmannR., OjalaA., SyngollitouE., CarrusG., Van HerzeleA., BellS., PodestaM. T. C., & WaasethG. (2011). Health benefits of nature experience: Psychological, social and cultural processes. In NilssonK., SangsterM., GallisC., HartigT., de VriesS., SeelandK. & SchipperijnJ. (Eds.), Forests, trees and human health (pp. 127–168). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
13.
HowellA. J., DopkoR. L., PassmoreH. A., & BuroK. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 166–171.
14.
JohnO. P., & SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A. & JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
JoiremanJ. A., ParrottL. P., & HammerslaJ. (2002). Empathy and the self-absorption paradox: Support for the distinction between self-rumination and self-reflection. Self and Identity, 1, 53–65.
16.
KimW., LimS. K., ChungE. J., & WooJ. M. (2009). The effect of cognitive behavior therapy-based psychotherapy applied in a forest environment on physiological changes and remission of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Investigation, 6, 245–254.
17.
MayerF., & FrantzC. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
18.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M., Bruehlman-SenecalE., & DolliverK. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41, 607–643.
19.
McCraeR. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
20.
MorN., & WinquistJ. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662.
21.
MorinA. (2006). Levels of consciousness and self-awareness: A comparison and integration of various neurocognitive views. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 358–371.
22.
MurisP., MayerB., den AdelM., RoosT., & van WamelenJ. (2009). Predictors of change following cognitive-behavioral treatment of children with anxiety problems: A preliminary investigation on negative automatic thoughts and anxiety control. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 40, 139–151.
23.
NaessA. (1973). The shallow and the deep ecology movements. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.
24.
NisbetE. K., & ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22, 1101–1106.
25.
NisbetE. K., ZelenskiJ. A., & MurphyS. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behaviour. Environment and Behaviour, 41, 715–740.
26.
PerrinJ. L., & BenassiV. A. (2009). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 434–440.
27.
RSPB. (2013). Giving nature a home. The Lodge, Sandy, UK: The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. Retrieved September22, 2013, from http://homes.rspb.org.uk
28.
SchultzP. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406.
29.
TamK.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78.
30.
TrapnellP. D., & CampbellJ. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284–304.
31.
ZelenskiJ. M., & NisbetE. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behaviour, 46, 3–23.
32.
ZhangJ. W., HowellR. T., & IyerR. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55–63.
