BenfieldJ. A., TaffB. D., NewmanP., & SmythJ. (2014). Natural sound facilitates mood recovery. Ecopsychology, 6, DOI:10.1089/eco.2014.0028.
2.
BranasC. C., CheneyR. A., MacDonaldJ. M., TamV. W., JacksonT. D., & Ten HaveT. R. (2011). A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174, 1296–1306.
3.
DeMilleS. M., ComartC., & TuckerA. (2014). Body composition changes in an outdoor behavioral healthcare program. Ecopsychology, 6, doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0012.
4.
DienerE. (2009). The collected works of Ed Diener. New York: Springer.
5.
EwertA. (2014). Military veterans and the use of adventure education experiences in natural environments for therapeutic outcomes. Ecopsychology, 6, doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0035.
6.
FrumkinH. (2013). The evidence of nature and the nature of evidence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 196–197.
7.
HarperN., NorrisJ., & D'astousM. (2014). Veterans and the Outward Bound experience: An evaluation of impact and meaning. Ecopsychology, 6, doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0101.
8.
HartigT., MitchellR., de VriesS., & FrumkinH. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228.
9.
HortonR., BeagleholeR., BonitaR., RaeburnJ., McKeeM., & WallS. (2014). From public to planetary health: A manifesto. The Lancet, 383, 847.
10.
KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (2012). Introduction to Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species. In KahnP. H.Jr., & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 1–22). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
KahnemanD., DienerE., & SchwarzN. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
KuoF. E., & SullivanW. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?. Environment and Behavior, 33, 343–367.
13.
LouvR. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
14.
LouvR. (2011). The nature principle: Human restoration and the end of nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
15.
MarselleM. R., IrvineK. N., & WarberS. L. (2014). Examining group walks in nature and multiple aspects of well-being: A large-scale study. Ecopsychology, 6, doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0027.
16.
McMichaelA. J. (2014). Population health in the Anthropocene: Gains, losses and emerging trends. The Anthropocene Review, 1, 44–56.
17.
MitchellR., & PophamF. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study. The Lancet, 372, 1655–1660.
18.
MooreE. O. (1981–1982). A prison environment's effect on health care service demands. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 17–34.
19.
NieuwenhuijsenM. J. (2003). Exposure assessment in occupational and environmental epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
PassmoreH.-A., & HowellA. J. (2014). Nature involvement increases hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: A two-week experimental study. Ecopsychology, 6, doi:10.1089/eco.2014.0023.
21.
RockströmJ., SteffenW., NooneK., PerssonA., ChapinF. S.III, LambinE. F., … FoleyJ. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
22.
SteffenW., PerssonA., DeutschL., ZalasiewiczJ., WilliamsM., RichardsonK., … SvedinU. (2011). The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40, 739–761.
23.
UlrichR. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.