BowersC. (2000). Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and the prospects of ecological sustainability. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
BrodyH. (2002). The other side of Eden: Hunter-gatherers, farmers, and the shaping of the world. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
4.
CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (1987). From evolution to behavior: Evolutionary psychology as the missing link. In DupréJ. (Ed.), The latest on the best: Essays on evolution and optimality (pp. 277–307). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
DiamondJ. (1993). New Guineans and their natural world. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 251–271). Washington, DC: Island Press.
6.
EhrlichP., & EhrlichA. (2010). The culture gap and its needed closures. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67, 481–492.
7.
HeerwagenJ. H., & HaseB. (2001, March–April). Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature. Environmental Design and Construction.
8.
HeydT. (2001). Aesthetic appreciation and many stories about nature. British Journal of Aesthetics, 41, 125–137.
9.
HollingC. S., & MeffeG. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.
10.
IngoldT. (2006). Rethinking the animate, re-animating thought. Ethnos, 71, 9–20.
11.
JicklingB. (2001). Environmental thought, the language of sustainability, and digital watches. Environmental Education Research, 7, 167–180.
12.
KahnP. H.Jr., (1997). Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: Children's affiliation with nature. Developmental Review, 17, 1–61.
13.
KahnP. H.Jr., (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
KellertS. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42–69). Washington, DC: Island Press.
15.
KellertS. R. (1996). The value of life: Biological diversity and human society. Washington, DC: Island Press.
16.
KellertS. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative development in children. In KahnP. H.Jr., & KellertS. R. (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
KellertS. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
18.
KellertS. R. (2013). Birthright: People and nature in the modern world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
KellertS. R., HeerwagenJ. H., & MadorM. (Eds.). (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
20.
KidnerD. W. (2001). Nature and psyche: Radical environmentalism and the politics of subjectivity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
LalandK. N., & BrownG. R. (2011). Sense and nonsense: Evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
LawrenceE. A. (1993). The sacred bee, the filthy pig, and the bat out of hell: Animal symbolism as cognitive biophilia. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 301–341). Washington, DC: Island Press.
MyersO. E.Jr., SaundersC. D., & GarrettE. (2003). What do children think animals need? Aesthetic and psycho-social conceptions. Environmental Education Research, 9, 305–323.
25.
NelsonR. K. (1993). Searching for the lost arrow: Physical and spiritual ecology in the hunter's world. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 201–228). Washington, DC: Island Press.
26.
PyleR. (2003). Nature matrix: Connecting people with nature. Oryx, 37, 206–214.
27.
SobelD. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education. Great Barrington, MA: The Orion Society and The Myrin Institute.
28.
WilsonE. O. (1993). Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In KellertS. R. & WilsonE. O. (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 31–41). Washington, DC: Island Press.