DavisJ. V. (2013). Ecopsychology's niche: Why the transpersonal matters to ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 5, 215–216.
3.
De YoungR. (2013). Transitioning to a new normal: How ecopsychology can help society prepare for the harder times ahead. Ecopsychology, 5, 237–239.
4.
EhrlichP. R., & EhrlichA. H. (2008). The dominant animal: Human evolution and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5.
FisherA. (2012). What is ecopsychology? A radical view. In KahnP. H.Jr, & HasbachP. H. (Eds.). Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 79–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
FisherA. (2013a). Ecopsychology at the crossroads: Contesting the nature of a field. Ecopsychology, 5, 167–176.
7.
FisherA. (2013b). Three arguments for a radical ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 5, 225–227.
8.
FriedmanB., & KahnP. H.Jr, (2008). Human values, ethics, and design. In JackoJ. A. & SearsA. (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (pp. 1241–1266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
FrumkinH. (2012). Building the science base: Ecopsychology meets clinical epidemiology. In KahnP. H.Jr, & HasbachP. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species (pp. 141–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
HasbachP. H. (2013). How deep can we go?. Ecopsychology, 5, 228–230.
11.
HaugenG. M. (2013). Entangled in the field. Ecopsychology, 5, 221–222.
12.
Johnson-PynnJ. S., & JohnsonL. R. (2013). Toward inclusivity, adaptation, and collective action in ecopsychology: Lessons from East Africa. Ecopsychology, 5, 233–236.
13.
KahnP. H.Jr., (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
KahnP. H.Jr, (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
KahnP. H.Jr, (2013). The next phase for Ecopsychology: Ideas and directions. Ecopsychology, 5, 163–166.
16.
KahnP. H.Jr, & HasbachP. H. (Eds.). (2012). Ecopsychology: Science, totems, and the technological species. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
KahnP. H.Jr, & HasbachP. H. (Eds.).2013. The rediscovery of the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
KahnP. H.Jr, IshiguroH., FriedmanB., KandaT., FreierN. G., SeversonR. L., & MillerJ. (2007). What is a human?—Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 8, 363–390.
19.
KahnP. H.Jr, ReichertA. L., GillB. T., KandaT., IshiguroH., & RuckertJ. H. (2011). Validating characterizations of sociality in HRI: It's more than psychometrics. In DautenhahnK. & SaundersJ. (Eds.), New frontiers in human-robot interaction (pp. 57–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
KarlinB. (2013). Technology and psychology—natural enemies or just plain natural?. Ecopsychology, 5, 217–218.
21.
KurzweilR. (2005). The singularity is near. New York, NY: Viking.
22.
MiltonM. (2013). Eco and queer psychologies: Natural allies to resist “Othering.”. Ecopsychology, 5, 223–224.
23.
PyeL. (2013). Diversity at the crossroads: A commentary on “Ecopsychology at the crossroads: Contesting the nature of a field.”. Ecopsychology, 5, 177–178.
24.
RoszakT. (1968). The making of a counter culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25.
SampsonS. D. (2013). Ecopsychology and the third crisis. Ecopsychology, 5, 212–214.
26.
SewallL. (2013). Ecopsychology's further emergence. Ecopsychology, 5, 219–220.
27.
SmithJ. P. (2013) Ecopsychology: Toward a new story of cultural and racial diversity. Ecopsychology, 5, 231–232.