AlbarracínD., ZannaM. P., JohnsonB. T., KumkaleG. T.2005. Attitudes: Introduction and scope. AlbarracínD., JohnsonB. T., ZannaM. P.The handbook of attitudes, 3–19. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BambergS., MöserG.2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27:14–25.
3.
BlaikieN. W. H.1992. The nature and origins of ecological world views: An Australian study. Social Science Quarterly, 73:144–165.
4.
CoelhoJ. A. P. M., GouveiaV. V., MilfontT. L.2006. Valores humanos como explicadores de atitudes ambientais e intenção de comportamento pró-ambiental [Human values as predictors of environmental attitudes and pro-environmental behavior]Psicologia em Estudo, 11:199–207.
5.
CohenJ.1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
DiekmannA., PreisendörferP.1998. Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society, 10:79–102.
7.
DietzT., SternP. C., GuagnanoG. A.1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30:450–471.
8.
DunlapR. E., JonesR. E.2002. Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. DunlapR. E., MichelsonW.Handbook of environmental sociology, 482–524. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
9.
DunlapR. E., Van LiereK. D., MertigA., JonesR. E.2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56:425–442.
10.
EaglyA. H., ChaikenS.1993. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
11.
EnnisR., ZannaM. P.2000. Attitude function and the automobile. MaioG. R., OlsonJ. M.Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes, 395–416. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
FeinbergM., WillerR.(in press)The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science.
13.
FeyginaI., JostJ. T., GoldsmithR. E.2009. System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36:326–338.
14.
FranssonN., GärlingT.1999. Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:369–382.
15.
GardnerG. T., SternP. C.2002. Environmental problems and human behavior, 2nd. Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
16.
HeberleinT. A.1981. Environmental attitudes. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik, 4:241–270.
HemphillJ. F.2003. Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58:78–80.
19.
HinesJ. M., HungerfordH. R., TomeraA. N.1987. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18:1–8.
20.
KaiserF. G., RanneyM., HartigT., BowlerP. A.1999. Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 4:59–74.
21.
KaiserF. G., ScheuthleH.2003. Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35:1033–1048.
22.
LakeB., MilfontT. L., GavinM. C.2012. The relative influence of psycho-social factors on urban edible gardening. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 41:49–58.
23.
MaytonD. M.1986. The structure of attitudes to doomsday issues: A replication. Australian Psychologist, 21:395–403.
24.
MilfontT. L.2007. Psychology of environmental attitudes: A cross-cultural study of their content and structure. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand.
25.
MilfontT. L.2009a. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. The Environmentalist, 29:263–269.
26.
MilfontT. L.2009b. A functional approach to the study of environmental attitudes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 10:235–252.
27.
MilfontT. L.2010. The psychological meaning of preservation and utilization attitudes: A study using the natural semantic network technique. Psyecology, 1:123–136.
28.
MilfontT. L.2012a. Cultural differences in environmental engagement. ClaytonS.Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, 181–202. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MilfontT. L.2012b. The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 32:1003–1020.
30.
MilfontT. L., AbrahamseW., McCarthyN.2011. Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40:56–67.
31.
MilfontT. L., DuckittJ.2004. The structure of environmental attitudes: A first- and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24:289–303.
32.
MilfontT. L., DuckittJ.2006. Preservation and utilization: Understanding the structure of environmental attitudes. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 7:29–50.
33.
MilfontT. L., DuckittJ.2010. The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30:80–94.
34.
MilfontT. L., DuckittJ., CameronL. D.2006. A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 38:745–767.
35.
MilfontT. L., GouveiaV. V.2006. Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26:72–82.
36.
MilfontT. L., HarréN., SibleyC. G., DuckittJ.2012. The climate-change dilemma: Examining the association between parental status and political party support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42:2386–2410.
37.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystem and well-being: Synthesis report. >Washington, DC: Island Press.
38.
PahlS., HarrisP. R., ToddH. A., RutterD. R.2005. Comparative optimism for environmental risks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25:1–11.
39.
PierceJ. C., LovrichN. P.Jr.1980. Belief systems concerning the environment: The general public, attentive publics, and state legislators. Political Behavior, 2:259–286.
40.
PrenticeD. A.1987. Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53:993–1003.
41.
RichardF. D., BondC. F.Jr., Stokes-ZootaJ. J.2003. One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7:331–363.
SchultzP. W.2001. The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21:327–339.
44.
SchultzP. W., GouveiaV. V., CameronL. D., TankhaG., SchmuckP., FranekM.2005. Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36:457–475.
45.
SchultzP. W., ShriverC., TabanicoJ. J., KhazianA. M.2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24:31–42.
46.
SchultzP. W., ZeleznyL. C.1999. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:255–265.
47.
SchultzP. W., ZeleznyL. C., DalrympleN. J.2000. A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32:576–591.
48.
SchwartzS. H.1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50:19–45.
49.
SidaniusJ., PrattoF.1999. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SternP. C.1992. Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43:269–302.
51.
SternP. C., DietzT.1994. The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50:65–84.
52.
SternP. C., GuagnanoG. A., DietzT.1998. A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58:984–1001.
53.
StokolsD.1990. Instrumental and spiritual views of people-environment relations. American Psychologist, 45:641–646.
54.
TheodoriG. L., LuloffA. E.2002. Position on environmental issues and engagement in proenvironmental behaviors. Society and Natural Resources, 15:471–482.
55.
ThompsonS. C. G., BartonM. A.1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14:149–157.
56.
TognacciL. N., WeigelR. H., WideenM. F., VernonD. T.1972. Environmental quality: How universal is public concern?Environment and Behavior, 4:73–86.
57.
Van LiereK. D., DunlapR. E.1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44:181–197.
58.
Walsh-DaneshmandiA., MacLachlanM.2000. Environmental risk to the self: Factor analysis and development of subscales for the environmental appraisal inventory (EAI) with an Irish sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20:141–149.
59.
WhiteL.Jr.1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155:1203–1207.
60.
WisemanM., BognerF. X.2003. A higher-order model of ecological values and its relationship to personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 34:783–794.