Endorsement of sustainable policies and programs is measured in two brief questionnaires. Pilot study correlations are found between these measures and two clusters of traits. Positive correlations are found with kindly religious beliefs, human rights endorsement, endorsement of government serving citizens as members of the community overall, and other such traits. Negative correlations are found with traits such as warmongering endorsement, endorsement of religious fundamentalism, social disenfranchisement, and endorsement of military dictatorship. Implications for possible evolutionary origins of these two clusters of traits as aspects of liberal and conservative political orientations are briefly discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychologist. 2000; 55,5.
2.
BechtelR., & ChurchmanA.2002. Handbook of environmental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
Corral-VerdugoV., CarrusG., BonnesM., MoserG., & SinhaJ.2008. Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation; toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40,5:703–725.
4.
DunlapR.1975. The impact of political orientation on environmental attitudes and actions. Environment and Behavior, 7,4:428–454.
EidelsonR., & EidelsonJ.2003. Dangerous ideas. American Psychologist, 58,3:182–192.
7.
FranssonN., & GarlingT.1999. Environmental concern: conceptual definitions measurement methods and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19,4:369–382.
8.
GarlingT., FujiiS., GarlingA., & JakobssonC.2003. Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of pro-environmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23,1:1–20.
9.
GreeleyA.1993. Religion and attitudes toward the environment. Journal for the Study of Religion, 32,1:19–28.
10.
HunsbergerB.1996. Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and hostility toward homosexuals in non-Christian religious groups. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 6,1:39–49.
11.
JonesR.E., & DunlapR.E.1992. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology, 57,1:28–47.
12.
LaszloE., & SeidelP.2006. Global survival: The challenge and its implications for thinking and acting. New York: Select Books.
13.
McConochieW.A.2007. Sixteen traits study (Publication #16)Retrieved from Political Psychology Research, Inc.politicalpsychologyresearch.com
14.
McConochieW.A.2009. Manual of political psychology scales, 2009 edition (Publication #4)Political Psychology Research, Inc.politicalpsychologyresearch.com
15.
McConochieW.A.2010a. Sixty-four psychological facets of conservative and liberal worldviews (Publication #30)Political Psychology Research, Inc.politicalpsychologyresearch.com
16.
McConochieW.A.2010b. What liberals and conservatives really think; psychological traits differentiating liberal from conservative worldviews. Replication study number 1 (Publication #36)Political Psychology Research, Inc.politicalpsychologyresearch.com
PielkeR.2007. The case for a sustainable climate policy: why costs and benefits must be temporally balanced. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155:1843–1857.
20.
PrattoF., SidaniusJ., StallworthL. M., & MalleB. F.1994. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67,4:741–763.
21.
SaucierG.2000. Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78,2:366–385.
22.
SwimJ., ClaytonS., DohertyT., GiffordR., HowardG., ReserJ., SternP., & WeberE.2009. Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges (Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change)American Psychological Associationwww.apa.org/science/climate-change
23.
ThornhillR., FincherC. L., & AranD.2008. Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 84,1:113–131.
24.
Van LiereK. D., & DunlapR. E.1981. Environmental concern: Does it make a difference how it's measured?Environment and Behavior, 13,6:651–676.
