ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In ClaytonS., & OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 249–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
ConnorL., AlbrechtG., HigginbothamN., FreemanS., & SmithW. (2004). Environmental change and human health in upper hunter communities of New South Wales, Australia. EcoHealth, 1,(Suppl. 2), 47–58.
3.
DavisJ. L., GreenJ. D., & ReedA. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 173–180.
4.
Diamanti-KandarakisE., BourguignonJ-P., GiudiceL. C., HauserR., PrinsG. S., SotoA. M., et al. (2009). Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: An endocrine society scientific statement. Endocrine Reviews, 30, 293–342.
5.
DohertyT. J. (2009). A peer reviewed journal for ecopsychology. Ecopsychology, 1, 1–7.
6.
DryzekJ. S. (1997). The politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.
GiffordR., ScannellL., KormosC., SmolovaL., BielA., BoncuS., et al. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
9.
HeifetzR. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap press.
10.
IPCC. (2007). Summary for policymakers. In SolomonS., QinD., ManningM., ChenZ., MarquisM., AveryK.B., TignorM., & MillerH. L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://www.ipcc-wg2.org/
11.
KahnP. (2001). The biophilia hypothesis: Empirical support & Amplifying evidence. In KahnP.. (Ed.), The Human Relationship with Nature (pp. 9–23). Boston: MIT Press.
12.
KidnerD. (2007). Depression and the natural world: Towards a critical ecology of psychological distress. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 19, 123–146.
13.
MacyJ., & BrownM. Y. (1998). Coming back to life: Practices to reconnect our lives, our world. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
14.
MaitenyP. T. (2002). Mind in the gap: Summary of research exploring “inner” influences on pro-sustainability learning and behavior. Environmental Education Research, 8, 299–306.
15.
OpotowS., & BrookA. (2003). Identity and exclusion in rangeland conflict. In ClaytonS. & OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 249–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
Pew Research Center. (January 22, 2009). Economy, jobs trump all other policy priorities in 2009. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from http://people-press.org/report/485/economy-top-policy-priority
17.
RoszakT. (1978). Person/Planet. Garden city, NY: Anchor press/Doubleday.
18.
SternP. (2000a). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.
19.
SternP. (2000b). Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist, 55, 523–530.
20.
StokolsD., MisraS., RunnerstromM. G., & HippJ. A. (2009). Psychology in an age of ecological crisis. American Psychologist, 64, 181–193.
21.
ThomashowM. (2002). Bringing the biosphere home. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.