A better understanding of conservation volunteers' motivation can provide insight into the relationship between humans and nature and help conservation programs increase their effectiveness. We used surveys and interviews of Minnesota Master Naturalist volunteers to explore conservation volunteers' psychological connection to nature. Almost all volunteers felt a connection to nature, and for most of them, this connection began in childhood. Their desires to learn about, benefit, and teach others about nature were important motivators in their decision to take part in conservation volunteer programs, and volunteering helped them to stay connected to nature. Their volunteer activities addressed these motivations and also provided other personal benefits, including stress reduction, relaxation, and exercise. It is important that conservation volunteer programs share information about the environmental benefits that result from volunteers' work, helping them understand the results of their collective action and thus increasing their motivation to volunteer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BixlerR. D., FloydM. F., HammittW. E.2002. Environmental socialization: Quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 34,6:795–818.
2.
BruyereB., RappeS.2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers'Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50,4:503–516.
3.
CharmazK.2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
ChawlaL.1999. Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31,1:15–26.
5.
ClaryE. G., SnyderM., RidgeR. D., CopelandJ., StukasA. A., HaugenJ.1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74,6:1516–1530.
6.
ClaryE., SnyderM., StukasA.1996. Volunteers' motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25:485–505.
7.
ClaytonS.2003. Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. ClaytonS., OpotowS.Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature, 45–66. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
ClaytonS., BrookA.2005. Can psychology help save the world? A model for conservation psychology. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5,1:87–102
9.
ClaytonS., OpotowS. 2003. Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
DillmanD. A.2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
EwertA., PlaceG., SibthorpJ.2005. Early-life outdoor experiences and an individual's environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27:225–239.
12.
FraserJ., ClaytonS., SicklerJ., TaylorA.2009. Belonging at the zoo: Retired volunteers, conservation activism, and collective identity. Ageing and Society, 29,3:351–368.
13.
GuineyM. S.2009. Caring for nature: Motivations for and outcomes of conservation volunteer work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, Minnesota.
14.
GuineyM. S., BlairR. B., FlinnD., HaggertyM. M., MainM. B., OberhauserK. S.et al.2006. Master Naturalist: a multiple state natural history education and community service program. North American Association for Environmental Education 2006 conference proceedingsRetrieved January 25, 2010http://www.naaee.org/conference-history/2006-proceedings
KalsE., SchumacherD., MontadaL.1999. Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31:178–202.
17.
KatzD.1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24:163–204.
18.
LeopoldA.1949. A sand county almanac and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
LohrV. I., Pearson-MimsC. H.2005. Children's active and passive interactions with plants influence their attitudes and actions toward trees and gardening as adults. HortTechnology, 15,3:472–476.
20.
LouvR.2005. The last child in the woods. New York: Algonquin Books.
21.
ManfredoM. J., DriverB. L., TarrantM. A.1996. Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. Journal of Leisure Research, 28,3:188–213.
22.
MayerF. S., FrantzC. M.2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24,4:503–515.
23.
MilesI., SullivanW. C., KuoF. E.1998. Ecological restoration volunteers: The benefits of participation. Urban Ecosystems, 2:27–41.
24.
NeisserU.1997. The roots of self-knowledge: Perceiving self, it, and thou. SnodgrassJ., ThompsonR.The self across psychology, 18–33. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
25.
RoszakT., GomesM. E., KannerA.1995. Ecopsychology. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
26.
RyanR. L., KaplanR., GreseR. E.2001. Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44,5:629–648.
27.
SaundersC.2003. The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10,2:137–149.
28.
SchroederH. W.2000. The restoration experience: Volunteers' motives, values, and concepts of nature. GobsterP. H., HullR. B.Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities, 247–264. Washington, DC: Island Press.
29.
SchultzP. W.2000. Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56:391–406.
30.
SchultzP. W., ShriverC., TabanicoJ., KhazianA.2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24:31–42.
31.
SchultzP. W., TabanicoJ. J.2007. Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37,6:1219–1247.
32.
ShapiroE.1995. Restoring habitats, communities, and souls. RoszakT., GomesM. E., KannerA.Ecopsychology, 224–239. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
33.
SnyderM.1993. Basic research and practical problems: The promise of a “functional personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19:251–264.
34.
SnyderM., OmotoA., CrainL.1999. Punished for their good deeds: Stigmatization of AIDS volunteers. American Behavioral Scientist, 42:1175–1192.
35.
StillD. T., GerholdH. D.1997. Motivations and task preferences of urban forestry volunteers. Journal of Arboriculture, 23,3:116–130.
36.
TannerT.1980. Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 11,4:20–24.
37.
ThomashowM.1995. Ecological identity: Becoming a reflective environmentalist. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
WellsN. M., LekiesK. S.2006. Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth, and Environment, 16,1:1–24.
39.
WilsonE. O.1984. Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
