BailynL. (2011). Putting gender on the table. In Becoming MIT: Moments of Decision, KaiserD., ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 165–185.
2.
BanajiM.R., and GreenwaldA.G. (2013). Blind Spot: Hidden Biases of Good People (Delacorte Press, New York).
3.
BarresB. (2006). Does gender matter?. Nature, 442, 133–136.
4.
Committee on Women Faculty in the School of Science MIT (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT, The MIT Faculty Newsletter 11. Available at http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html, last accessed February2, 2015.
5.
Committees on Women Faculty in the Schools of Science and Engineering MIT (2011). A report on the status of women faculty in the schools of science and engineering at MIT, 2011. Available at http://web.mit.edu/faculty/reports/pdf/women_faculty.pdf, last accessed February2, 2015.
6.
HopkinsN. (2007). Diversification of a university faculty, women in the MIT schools of science and engineering. New Engl J Public Policy, 22, 119–134.
7.
HopkinsN. (2011). An account of how the MIT report on women in science came to be written. In Becoming MIT: Moments of Decision, KaiserD., ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 186–192.
8.
MasonM.A., WolfingerN.H., and GouldenM. (2013). Do Babies Matter? Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower (Rutgers Press, New Brunswick, NJ).
9.
McCookA. (2013). Women in biotechnology: barred from the boardroom. Nature, 495, 25–27.
10.
Moss-RacusinaC.A., GrahamM.J., and HandelsmanJ. (2012). Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109, 16474–16479.
11.
RossiterM.W. (1982, 1995, 2012). Women Scientists in America, vols. 1, 2, and 3 (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
12.
SheltzerJ.M., and SmithJ.C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 111, 10107–10112.
13.
ValianV. (1999). Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
