PhillipM, NimriR, BergenstalRM, et al.Consensus recommendations for the use of automated insulin delivery technologies in clinical practice. Endocr Rev, 2023; 44: 254–280.
2.
BurnsideMJ, LewisDM, CrocketHR, et al.Open-source automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 387: 869–881.
3.
WadwaRP, ReedZW, BuckinghamBA, et al.Trial of hybrid closed-loop control in young children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2023; 388: 991–1001.
4.
Bionic Pancreas Research Group; RussellSJ, BeckRW, et al.Multicenter, randomized trial of a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 387: 1161–1172.
5.
BoughtonCK, AllenJM, WareJ, et al.Closed-loop therapy and preservation of C-peptide secretion in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 387: 882–893.
6.
ChoudharyP, KolassaR, KeuthageW, et al.Advanced hybrid closed loop therapy versus conventional treatment in adults with type 1 diabetes (ADAPT): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022; 10: 720–731.
7.
BoughtonCK, HartnellS, HobdayN, et al.Implementation of fully closed-loop insulin delivery for inpatients with diabetes: real-world outcomes. Diabet Med, 2023; 40: e15092.
8.
PinskerJE, DassauE, DeshpandeS, et al.Outpatient randomized crossover comparison of zone model predictive control automated insulin delivery with weekly data driven adaptation versus sensor-augmented pump: results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 635–642.
9.
DalyAB, BoughtonCK, NwokoloM, et al.Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 2 diabetes: an open-label, single-center, randomized crossover trial. Nat Med, 2023; 29: 203–208.
10.
DavisGM, PetersAL, BodeBW, et al.Safety and efficacy of the Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery system in adults with type 2 diabetes: from injections to hybrid closed-loop therapy. Diabetes Care, 2023; 46: 742–750.
11.
ChakrabartiA, TrawleyS, KubilayE, et al.Closed-loop insulin delivery effects on glycemia during sleep and sleep quality in older adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the ORACL Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 666–671.
12.
FlattAJ, PeleckisAJ, Dalton-BakesC, et al.Automated insulin delivery for hypoglycemia avoidance and glucose counterregulation in long-standing type 1 diabetes with hypoglycemia unawareness. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 302–314.
13.
LynchJ, KanapkaLG, RussellSJ, et al.The Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas Pivotal Trial Extension Study: a multi-center single-arm evaluation of the insulin-only configuration of the bionic pancreas in adults and youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 726–736.
14.
SherrJL, BodeBW, ForlenzaGP, et al.Safety and glycemic outcomes with a tubeless automated insulin delivery system in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a single-arm multicenter clinical trial. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 1907–1910.
15.
GargSK, GrunbergerG, WeinstockR, et al.Adult and pediatric MiniMed HCL outcomes 6-month RCT: HCL versus CSII control study group. improved glycemia with hybrid closed-loop versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy: results from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 1–12.
16.
BeckRW, KanapkaLG, BretonMD, et al.A meta-analysis of randomized trial outcomes for the t: slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology in youth and adults from age 2 to 72. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 329–342.
17.
MichouP, GkiourtzisN, ChristoforidisA, KotanidouEP, Galli-TsinopoulouA.The efficacy of automated insulin delivery systems in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2023; 199: 110678.
18.
ZengB, JiaH, GaoL, YangQ, YuK, SunF.Dual-hormone artificial pancreas for glucose control in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1967–1975.
DermawanD, Kenichi PurbayantoMA.An overview of advancements in closed-loop artificial pancreas system. Heliyon, 2022; 8: e11648.
21.
NwokoloM, HovorkaR.The artificial pancreas and type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2023; 108: 1614–1623.
22.
KarolAB, O'MalleyG, FallurinR, LevyCJ.Automated insulin delivery systems as a treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review. Endocr Pract, 2023; 29: 214–220.
23.
RenardE.Automated insulin delivery systems: from early research to routine care of type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol, 2023; 60: 151–161.
24.
PeaseA, CallanderE, ZomerE, et al.The cost of control: cost-effectiveness analysis of hybrid closed-loop therapy in youth. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 1971–1980.
25.
SherrJL, HeinemannL, FlemingGA, et al.Automated insulin delivery: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. a consensus report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 3058–3074.
26.
SherrJL, HeinemannL, FlemingGA, et al.Automated insulin delivery: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report of the Joint Diabetes Technology Working Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetologia, 2023; 66: 3–22.
27.
RankinD, HartRI, KimbellB, et al.Rollout of closed-loop technology to pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: healthcare professionals’ views about potential challenges and solutions. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 260–269.
28.
KovatchevBP, SinghH, MuellerL, Gonder-FrederickLA.Biobehavioral changes following transition to automated insulin delivery: a large real-life database analysis. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45: 2636–2643.
29.
ArrietaA, BattelinoT, ScaramuzzaAE, et al.Comparison of MiniMed 780G system performance in users aged younger and older than 15 years: evidence from 12 870 real-world users. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1370–1379.
30.
ForlenzaGP, CarlsonAL, GalindoRJ, et al.Real-world evidence supporting tandem control-IQ hybrid closed-loop success in the Medicare and Medicaid type 1 and type 2 diabetes populations. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 814–823.
31.
AkturkHK, Snell-BergeonJ, ShahVN.Efficacy and safety of tandem control IQ without user-initiated boluses in adults with uncontrolled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 779–783.
32.
BenhamouPY, AdenisA, LebbadH, et al.One-year real-world performance of the DBLG1 closed-loop system: data from 3706 adult users with type 1 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2023; 25: 1607–1613.
33.
MatejkoB, JuzaA, Kieć-WilkB, et al.One-year follow-up of advance hybrid closed-loop system in adults with type 1 diabetes previously naive to diabetes technology: the effect of switching to a calibration-free sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 554–558.
34.
LombardoF, PassanisiS, AlibrandiA, et al.MiniMed 780G six-month use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: clinical targets and predictors of optimal glucose control. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 404–413.
35.
WangXS, DunlopAD, McKeenJA, FeigDS, DonovanLE.Real-world use of Control-IQ technology automated insulin delivery in pregnancy: a case series with qualitative interviews. Diabet Med, 2023; 40: e15086.
36.
WareJ, AllenJM, BoughtonCK, et al.Hybrid closed-loop with faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in very young children with type 1 diabetes: a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, crossover study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 431–436.
37.
LachalS, TourkiY, FrancS, HunekerE, CharpentierG, BenhamouPY.Hybrid closed-loop control with ultrarapid lispro compared with standard insulin aspart and faster insulin aspart: an in silico study. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2023; 17: 176–185.
38.
BeckRW, RussellSJ, DamianoER, et al.A multicenter randomized trial evaluating fast-acting insulin aspart in the bionic pancreas in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 681–696.
39.
PasquaMR, JafarA, KobayatiA, TsoukasMA, HaidarA.Low-dose empagliflozin as adjunct to hybrid closed-loop insulin therapy in adults with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2023; 46: 165–172.
40.
HughesMS, KingmanRS, HsuL, LalRA, BuckinghamBA, ZaharievaDP.Swimming with the Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery system: connectivity in the water. Diabetes Care, 2023; 46: e148–e150.
41.
BrownSA.On the path toward expanding treatment options for diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 387: 935–936.
42.
ScaramuzzaAE, CherubiniV, RabboneI.Open-source automated insulin delivery in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 387: 2006–2007.
43.
BrownSA, KovatchevBP, RaghinaruD, et al; iDCL Trial ResearchGroup.Six-month randomized, multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2019; 381: 1707–1717.
44.
BretonMD, KanapkaLG, BeckRW, et al; iDCL Trial ResearchGroup.A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2020; 383: 836–845.
45.
NimriR, PhillipM, KovatchevB.Decision support systems and closed-loop. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24 (Suppl 1): S58–S75.
46.
HuangS, LiangY, LiJ, LiXJ.Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in diabetes management—a scoping review. Diabetes, 2023; 72 (Suppl 1): 1055-P.
47.
AhmedA, AzizS, Abd-AlrazaqA, FarooqA, SheikhJ.Overview of artificial intelligence-driven wearable devices for diabetes: scoping review. J Med Internet Res, 2022; 24: e36010.
48.
LeeYB, KimG, JunJE, et al.An integrated digital health care platform for diabetes management with AI-based dietary management: 48-week results from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2023; 46: 959–966.
49.
LupidiM, DanieliL, FruttiniD, et al.Artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: clinical assessment using handheld fundus camera in a real-life setting. Acta Diabetol, 2023; 60: 1083–1088.
50.
BersouxS, CookCB, KongableGL, ShuJ, ZitoDR.Benchmarking glycemic control in U.S. hospitals. Endocr Pract, 2014; 20: 876–883.
51.
Pichardo-LowdenA, UmpierrezG, LehmanEB, et al.Clinical decision support to improve management of diabetes and dysglycemia in the hospital: a path to optimizing practice and outcomes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2021; 9: e001557.
52.
KargesB, SchwandtA, HeidtmannB, et al.Association of insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. JAMA, 2017; 318: 1358–1366.
53.
BisioA, AndersonS, NorlanderL, et al.Impact of a novel diabetes support system on a cohort of individuals with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily injections: a multicenter randomized study. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 186–193.
54.
El FathiA, PalisaitisE, von OettingenJE, et al.A pilot non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess automatic adjustments of insulin doses in adolescents with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily injections therapy. Pediatr Diabetes, 2020; 21: 950–959.
55.
FangM, WangD, CoreshJ, SelvinE.Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U.S. adults, 1999–2018. N Engl J Med, 2021; 384: 2219–2228.
56.
GargS.Top 30 ChatGPT alternatives that will blow your mind in 2023 (free & paid). Writesonic, August 20, 2023. https://writesonic.com/blog/chatgpt-alternatives/.
57.
SharmaS, PajaiS, PrasadR, et al.A critical review of ChatGPT as a potential substitute for diabetes educators. Cureus, 2023; 15: e38380.
58.
HuangC, ChenL, HuangH, et al.Evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT's responses to diabetes questions and misconceptions. Transl Med, 2023; 21: 502.
59.
NakhlehA, SpitzerS, ShehadehN.ChatGPT's response to the diabetes knowledge questionnaire: implications for diabetes education. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 571–573.
60.
BaileyR, CalhounP, BergenstalRM, et al.Assessment of the glucose management indicator using different sampling durations. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 148–150.
61.
MonzonAD, PattonSR, ClementsM.An examination of the glucose management indicator in young children with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2022; 16: 1505–1512.
62.
AkturkHK, HerreroP, OliverN, et al.Impact of different types of data loss on optimal continuous glucose monitoring sampling duration. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 749–753.
63.
XuY, BergenstalRM, DunnTC, et al.Interindividual variability in average glucose-glycated haemoglobin relationship in type 1 diabetes and implications for clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1779–1787.
64.
ShahVN, VigersT, PyleL, et al.Discordance between glucose management indicator and glycated hemoglobin in people without diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 324–328.
65.
DunnTC, XuY, BergenstalRM, et al.Personalized glycated hemoglobin in diabetes management: closing the gap with glucose management indicator. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(Suppl 3): S65–S74.
66.
ShahVN.Limitations of reporting time below range as a percentage. Diabetes Technol Ther. Published online August 18, 2023. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0247.
67.
SchiavonM, GalderisiA, BasuA, et al.A new index of insulin sensitivity from glucose sensor and insulin pump data: in silico and in vivo validation in youths with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25: 270–278.
68.
EspinozaJC, YeungAM, HuangJ, et al.The need for data standards and implementation policies to integrate insulin delivery data into the electronic health record. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2023; 17: 1376–1386.
69.
EspinozaJ, XuNY, NguyenKT, et al.The need for data standards and implementation policies to integrate CGM data into the electronic health record. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2023; 17: 495–502.
70.
XuNY, NguyenKT, DuBordAY, et al.The launch of the iCoDE standard project. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2022; 16: 887–895.
71.
YeungAM, HuangJ, KlonoffDC, et al.iCoDE June 22, 2022 Steering Committee meeting summary report. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2022; 16: 1575–1576.
72.
EspinozaJ, KlonoffD, VidmarA, et al.2022 iCoDE Report: CGM-EHR Integration Standards and Recommendations. Diabetes Technology Society; November 7, 2022. https://www.diabetestechnology.org/icode/.
73.
ZaharievaDP, SenanayakeR, BrownC, et al.Adding glycemic and physical activity metrics to a multimodal algorithm-enabled decision-support tool for type 1 diabetes care: keys to implementation and opportunities. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022; 13: 1096325.
74.
SlyB, RussellAW, SullivanC.Digital interventions to improve safety and quality of inpatient diabetes management: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform, 2022; 157: 104596.
75.
GerwerJE, BacaniG, JuangPS, et al.Electronic health record-based decision-making support in inpatient diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep, 2022; 22: 433–440.
76.
BergenstalRM, SimonsonGD, HeinemannL.More green, less red: how color standardization may facilitate effective use of CGM data. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2022; 16: 3–6.
77.
HuangJ, YeungAM, ArmstrongDG, et al.Artificial intelligence for predicting and diagnosing complications of diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2023; 17: 224–238.
78.
SheerR, NairR, PasqualeMK, et al.Predictive risk models to identify patients at high-risk for severe clinical outcomes with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. J Prim Care Community Health, 2022; 13: 21501319211063726.
79.
KarallieddeJ, FrenchO, BurnhillG, et al.A pragmatic digital health informatics based approach for aiding clinical prioritisation and reducing backlog of care: a study in cohort of 4022 people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2023; 203: 110834.
80.
CheheltaniR, KingN, LeeS, et al.Predicting misdiagnosed adult-onset type 1 diabetes using machine learning. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2022; 191: 110029.
81.
Mosquera-LopezC, RamseyKL, Roquemen-EcheverriV, et al.Modeling risk of hypoglycemia during and following physical activity in people with type 1 diabetes using explainable mixed-effects machine learning. Comput Biol Med, 2023; 155: 106670.
82.
RenY, LoftusTJ, DattaS, et al.Performance of a machine learning algorithm using electronic health record data to predict postoperative complications and report on a mobile platform. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5: e2211973.
83.
WilliamsDD, FerroD, MullaneyC, et al.Development of an “all-data-on-hand” deep learning model to predict hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). JMIR Diabetes, 2023; 8: e47592.
84.
FabrisC, HeinemannL, BeckR, et al.Estimation of hemoglobin A1c from continuous glucose monitoring data in individuals with type 1 diabetes: is time in range all we need?. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22: 501–508.