ZieglerAG, DanneT, DanielC, BonifacioE. 100 Years of insulin: lifesaver, immune target, and potential remedy for prevention. Med (N Y). 2021; 2: 1120–1137.
2.
MathieuC, MartensPJ, VangoitsenhovenR. One hundred years of insulin therapy. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2021; 17: 715–725.
3.
Keeping the 100-year-old promise: making insulin access universal [article online], November 12, 2021. Available at www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039100.
4.
PettusJ, Santos CavaiolaT, TamborlaneWV, EdelmanS. The past, present, and future of basal insulins. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2016; 32: 478–496.
5.
SarkarS, HeywardJ, AlexanderGC, KalyaniRR. Trends in insulin types and devices used by adults with type 2 diabetes in the United States, 2016 to 2020. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4: e2128782.
6.
van den BoomL, KostevK. Patterns of insulin therapy and insulin daily doses in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 296–301.
7.
Pedersen-BjergaardU, AgesenRM, BrøsenJMB, et al.Comparison of treatment with insulin degludec and glargine U100 in patients with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia: the HypoDeg randomized, controlled, open-label, crossover trial. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 257–267.
8.
BrøsenJMB, AgesenRM, AlibegovicAC, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring-recorded hypoglycemia with insulin degludec or insulin glargine U100 in people with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 643–654.
9.
GoldenbergRM, ArodaVR, BillingsLK, et al.Effect of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U100 on time in range: SWITCH PRO, a crossover study of basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and risk factors for hypoglycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 2572–2581.
10.
RingholmL, Callesen DoN, DammP, MathiesenER. Pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes using insulin degludec. Acta Diabetol, 2022; 59: 721–727.
11.
Research Study Comparing Insulin Degludec to InsulinDetemir, Together with InsulinAspart, in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes (EXPECT) [article online], accessed August212022. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03377699.
12.
NishimuraE, PridalL, GlendorfT, et al.Molecular and pharmacological characterization of insulin icodec: a new basal insulin analog designed for once-weekly dosing. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2021; 9: e002301.
13.
MoyersJS, HansenRJ, DayJW, et al.Preclinical characterization of LY3209590, a novel weekly basal insulin Fc-fusion protein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2022; 382: 346–355.
14.
WhiteJ, WagnerA, PatelH. The impact of biosimilar insulins on the diabetes landscape. J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2022; 28: 91–98.
15.
BeranD, EwenM, LaingR. Constraints and challenges in access to insulin: a global perspective. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2016; 4: 275–285.
Civica to Manufacture and Distribute Affordable Insulin [article online], March 3, 2022. Available at https://civicarx.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Civica-Affordable-Insulin-Press-Release-03.03.22.pdf.
19.
KuehnBM. First interchangeable biosimilar insulin drug is approved. JAMA. 2021; 326: 801.
20.
MatliMC, WilsonAB, RappsilberLM, SheffieldFP, FarlowML, JohnsonJL. The First interchangeable biosimilar insulin: insulin glargine-yfgn. J Diabetes Sci Technol Dec 31; 19322968211067511. doi: 10.1177/19322968211067511. Online ahead of print.
21.
PhamTT, ChenX, BarronJ, HartR, AbarcaJ, DeVriesA. Effectiveness, safety, and treatment adherence of biosimilar follow-on insulin in diabetes management. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1989–1997.
22.
FisherA, KimJD, DormuthC. The impact of mandatory nonmedical switching from originator to biosimilar insulin glargine. Clin Ther, 2022; 44: 957–970.
23.
HayesKN, MorV, ZulloAR. Electronic health records to rapidly assess biosimilar uptake: an example using insulin glargine in a large U.S. nursing home cohort. Front Pharmacol, 2022; 13: 855598.
24.
GodmanB, HaqueM, LeongT, et al.The current situation regarding long-acting insulin analogues including biosimilars among African, Asian, European, and South American countries; findings and implications for the future. Front Public Health, 2021; 9: 671961.
25.
GodmanB, WladysiukM, McTaggartS, et al.Utilisation trend of long-acting insulin analogues including biosimilars across Europe: findings and implications. Biomed Res Int, 2021; 2021: 9996193.
26.
GodmanB, HaqueM, KumarS, et al.Current utilization patterns for long-acting insulin analogues including biosimilars among selected Asian countries and the implications for the future. Curr Med Res Opin, 2021; 3: 1529–1545.
27.
WangH, ZhouY, ZhaiX, et al.Evaluating glycemic control during Basalin or Lantus administration in adults with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 754820.
28.
YangLJ, WuTW, TangCH, PengTR. Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord, 2022; 22: 35.
29.
SaundersH, PhamB, LoongD, et al.The cost-effectiveness of intermediate-acting, long-acting, ultralong-acting, and biosimilar insulins for type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Value Health, 2022; 25: 1235–1252.
30.
HompeschM, HawrylukA, HernandezM, UchilB, WilmingtonA, PetersonL. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence between regular human insulin (rDNA origin) in 0.9% sodium chloride ready-to-use infusion 1 U/mL and 100 U/mL concentrate diluted to 1 U/mL in healthy males. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 2679–2686.
31.
VishwakarmaG, NupurN, RathoreAS. Assessing the structural and functional similarity of insulin glargine biosimilars. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2021 December 01; 19322968211058482. doi: 10.1177/19322968211058482. Online ahead of print.
32.
WangW, SongX, LouY, DuL, ZhuD, ZhouZ. Immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine and Lantus(R) insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1094–1104.
33.
YanX, JiangS, LouY, ZhouZ. Comparable efficacy and safety between LY2963016 insulin glargine and insulin glargine (Lantus(R)) in Chinese patients with type 1 diabetes: a phase III, randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 2226–2233.
34.
YanX, FengC, LouY, ZhouZ. Efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 1 diabetes previously treated with insulin glargine (Lantus((R))): a post hoc analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Diabetes Ther, 2022; 13: 1161–1174.
35.
KapitzaC, NosekL, SchmiderW, TeichertL, MukherjeeB, NowotnyI. A single-dose euglycaemic clamp study in two cohorts to compare the exposure of SAR341402 (insulin aspart) mix 70/30 with US- and European-approved versions of insulin aspart mix 70/30 and SAR341402 rapid-acting solution in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 674–681.
36.
AravindSR, SinghKP, AquitaniaG, et al.Biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 mix 70/30 versus originator insulin aspart mix 70/30 (NovoMix 30) in people with diabetes: a 26-week, randomized, open-label trial (GEMELLI M). Diabetes Ther, 2022; 13: 1053–1071.
37.
AravindSR, SinghKP, MogylnytskaL, et al.Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 mix 70/30 compared with originator insulin aspart mix 70/30 in adults with diabetes (GEMELLI M): a subgroup analysis by prior type of premix insulin. Diabetes Ther, 2022; 13: 1299–1310.
38.
ShiramotoM, YoshiharaT, SchmiderW, et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between SAR341402 insulin aspart and Japan-approved NovoRapid in healthy Japanese subjects. Sci Rep, 2021; 11: 22931.
39.
ShiramotoM, YoshiharaT, SchmiderW, et al.Similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of biosimilar SAR342434 insulin lispro and Japan-approved humalog insulin lispro in healthy Japanese subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 2022; 11: 754–760.
40.
HovelmannU, RaiterY, ChullikanaA, et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL-1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 2670–2678.
41.
Plum-MorschelL, SinghG, MurugesanSMN, et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of Biocon's biosimilar Insulin-R with the US-licensed Humulin(R) R formulation in healthy subjects: results from the RHINE-1 (Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence-1) study. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 713–721.
42.
Guideline on non-clinical and clinical development of similar biological medicinal products containing recombinant human insulin and insulin analogues, accessed June24, 2022. Available at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-non-clinical-clinical-development-similar-biological-medicinal-products-containing_en-0.pdf.
43.
Plum-MorschelL, KleinO, SinghG, et al.Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence of Biocon's biosimilar insulin 70/30 with US-licensed HUMULIN(R) 70/30 formulation in healthy subjects: results from the RHINE-3 (Recombinant Human INsulin Equivalence-3) study. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1819–1828.
44.
DraiRV, KaronovaTL, MayorovAY, et al.Clinical pharmacology of insulin aspart biosimilar GP40071: pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparability in hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp procedure. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 2022; 11: 922–929.
45.
VencioS, Caiado-VencioR, CaixetaLF, et al.A randomized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic trial of two regular human insulins demonstrates bioequivalence in type 1 diabetes and availability of biosimilar insulin may improve access to this medication. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1544–1552.
46.
BramlageP, TittelSR, MütherS, et al. A comparison of the rapid-acting insulin analogue glulisine with lispro and aspart for the pump treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2022 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01939-3. Online ahead of print.
47.
BillionL, CharleerS, VerbraekenL, et al.Glucose control using fast-acting insulin aspart in a real-world setting: a 1-year, two-center study in people with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 2716–2727.
48.
LaneW, FaurbyM, HusemoenLLN, MarkovichDL, RathorN, De BlockC. Glycaemic control in people with diabetes starting treatment with fast-acting insulin aspart: a US database study. Diabetes Ther, 2021; 12: 3067–3077.
49.
BodeB, CarlsonA, LiuR, et al.Ultrarapid lispro demonstrates similar time in target range to lispro with a hybrid closed-loop system. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23: 828–836.
50.
MorrisonD, ZaharievaDP, LeeMH, et al.Comparable glucose control with fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart using a second-generation hybrid closed-loop system during exercise. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 93–101.
51.
DeberlesE, MorelloR, HardouinJ, et al.The switch from rapid-acting to concentrated regular insulin improves glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients on pump therapy: a cohort survey. Diabetes Metab, 2022; 48: 101300.
52.
Gorst-RasmussenA, SturisJ, EkelundM. Continuous glucose monitoring sensor glucose levels and insulin pump infusion set wear-time during treatment with fast-acting insulin aspart: a post hoc analysis of Onset 5. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 10–17.
53.
KhadriaA, PaavolaCD, MaslovK, et al.Photoacoustic imaging reveals mechanisms of rapid-acting insulin formulations dynamics at the injection site. Mol Metab, 2022; 62: 101522.
54.
GrantM, HeiseT, BaughmanR. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled technosphere insulin and subcutaneous insulin lispro in the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2022; 61: 413–422.
55.
KaisermanKB, ChristiansenM, BhavsarS, et al. Reduction in postprandial peak glucose with increased technosphere insulin dosage. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022 Jul 14; 19322968221110622. doi: 10.1177/19322968221110622. Online ahead of print.
56.
WeinstockRS, BodeBW, GargSK, et al.Reduced hypoglycaemia using liver-targeted insulin in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 1762–1769.
57.
van BonAC, BodeBW, Sert-LangeronC, DeVriesJH, CharpentierG. Insulin glulisine compared to insulin aspart and to insulin lispro administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2011; 13: 607–614.
58.
KordonouriO, BiesterT, WeidemannJ, et al.Lipoatrophy in children, adolescents and adults with insulin pump treatment: Is there a beneficial effect of insulin glulisine?. Pediatr Diabetes, 2020; 21: 1285–1291.