KieuA, KingJ, GovenderRD, ÖstlundhL. The benefits of utilizing continuous glucose monitoring of diabetes mellitus in primary care: a systematic review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022 Feb 1;19322968211070855. doi: 10.1177/19322968211070855. Online ahead of print.
2.
RajR, MishraR, JhaN, JoshiV, CorreaR, KernPA. Time in range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. BMJ Open Diab Res Care, 2022; 10: e002573.
3.
SteckAK, DongF, RasmussenCG, et al.CGM metrics predict imminent progression to type 1 diabetes: autoimmunity screening for kids (ASK) study. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45: 365–71.
4.
Smigoc SchweigerD. Recent advances in immune-based therapies for type 1 diabetes. Horm Res Paediatr 2022 May 9. doi: 10.1159/000524866. Online ahead of print.
5.
SimsEK, BesserREJ, DayanC, et al.Screening for type 1 diabetes in the general population: a status report and perspective. Diabetes, 2022; 71: 610–23.
6.
SteckAK, DongF, TakiI, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring predicts progression to diabetes in autoantibody positive children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2019; 104: 3337–44.
7.
KarlFM, WinklerC, ZieglerAG, LaxyM, AchenbachP. Costs of public health screening of children for presymptomatic type 1 diabetes in Bavaria, Germany. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 837–44.
8.
CarrALJ, Evans-MolinaC, OramRA. Precision medicine in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia, 2022; 285: 40–48.
9.
RickelsMR, Evans-MolinaC, BahnsonHT, et al.High residual C-peptide likely contributes to glycemic control in type 1 diabetes. J Clin Invest, 2020; 130: 1850–62.
10.
HeroldKC, BundyBN, LongSA, et al.An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2019; 381: 603–13.
11.
WeissA, Zapardiel-GonzaloJ, VossF, et al. Progression likelihood score identifies substages of presymptomatic type 1 diabetes in childhood public health screening. Diabetologia 2022; 2022 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05780-9. Online ahead of print.
12.
Cardona-HernandezR, SchwandtA, AlkandariH, et al.Glycemic outcome associated with insulin pump and glucose sensor use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Data from the international pediatric registry SWEET. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: 1176–84.
13.
BolinderJ, AntunaR, Geelhoed-DuijvestijnP, et al.Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016; 388(10057): 2254–63.
14.
BeckRW, RiddlesworthT, RuedyK, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections the diamond randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2017; 317: 371–78.
15.
HeinemannL, FreckmannG, EhrmannD, et al.Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired hypoglycaemia awareness or severe hypoglycaemia treated with multiple daily insulin injections (HypoDE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2018; 391(10128): 1367–77.
16.
LaffelLM, KanapkaLG, BeckRW, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2020; 323: 2388–96.
17.
PratleyRE, KanapkaLG, RickelsMR, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2020; 323: 2397–406.
18.
DiMeglioLA, KanapkaLG, DeSalvoDJ, et al.A randomized clinical trial assessing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use with standardized education with or without a family behavioral intervention compared with fingerstick blood glucose monitoring in very young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: 464–72.
19.
DovcK, Van NameM, Jenko BizjanB, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring use and glucose variability in very young children with type 1 diabetes (VibRate): a multinational prospective observational real-world cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 564–69.
20.
ChampakanathA, AkturkHK, AlonsoGT, Snell-BergeonJK, ShahVN. Continuous glucose monitoring initiation within first year of type 1 diabetes diagnosis is associated with improved glycemic outcomes: 7-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 750–53
21.
SandersonEE, AbrahamMB, SmithGJ, MountainJA, JonesTW, DavisEA. Continuous glucose monitoring improves glycemic outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes: real-world data from a population-based clinic. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: e171–72.
22.
FosterNC, BeckRW, MillerKM, et al.State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21: 66–72.
23.
DeshmukhH, WilmotEG, GregoryR, et al.Effect of flash glucose monitoring on glycemic control, hypoglycemia, diabetes-related distress, and resource utilization in the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) nationwide audit. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2153–60.
24.
JohnsonSR, Holmes-WalkerDJ, CheeM, EarnestA, JonesTW. Universal subsidized continuous glucose monitoring funding for young people with type 1 diabetes: uptake and outcomes over 2 years, a population-based study. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 391–97.
25.
BurckhardtM-A, AbrahamMB, MountainJ, et al.Improvement in psychosocial outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents following subsidy for continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21: 575–80.
26.
CharleerS, De BlockC, Van HuffelL, et al.Quality of life and glucose control after 1 year of nationwide reimbursement of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults living with type 1 diabetes (FUTURE): a prospective observational real-world cohort study. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 389–97.
27.
RotondiMA, WongO, RiddellM, PerkinsB. Population-level impact and cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring technologies for adults with type 1 diabetes in Canada: a modeling study. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 2012–19.
28.
RabboneI, SavastioS, PigniatielloC, et al.Significant and persistent improvements in time in range and positive emotions in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using a closed-loop control system after attending a virtual educational camp. Acta Diabetol, 2022; 59: 837–42.
29.
HermannsN, EhrmannD, ShapiraA, KulzerB, SchmittA, LaffelL. Coordination of glucose monitoring, self-care behaviour and mental health: achieving precision monitoring in diabetes. Diabetologia 2022 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05685-7. Online ahead of print.
30.
NimriR, TiroshA, MullerI, et al.Comparison of Insulin dose adjustments made by artificial intelligence-based decision support systems and by physicians in people with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 564–72.
31.
WeinstockRS, DuBoseSN, BergenstalRM, et al.Risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2016; 39: 603–10.
32.
PunthakeeZ, MillerME, LaunerLJ, et al.Poor cognitive function and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: post hoc epidemiologic analysis of the ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care, 2012; 35: 787–93.
33.
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 1593–603.
34.
WeinsteinJM, KahkoskaAR. Association of continuous glucose monitoring use and hemoglobin A1c levels across the lifespan among individuals with type 1 diabetes in the US. JAMA Netw Open, 2022; 5(7): E2223942.
35.
MillerKM, KanapkaLG, RickelsMR, et al.Benefit of continuous glucose monitoring in reducing hypoglycemia is sustained through 12 months of use among older adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 424-434.
36.
ScottEM, MurphyHR, KristensenKH, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and birth weight: informing management of type 1 diabetes throughout pregnancy. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 1724-1734.
37.
PereaV, PicónMJ, MegiaA, et al.Addition of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring to standard care in a cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: effect on glycaemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Diabetologia. 2022; 65: 1302–14.
38.
FeigDS, DonovanLE, CorcoyR, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2017; 390(10110): 2347–59.
39.
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45(Suppl 1): S232–43.
40.
VisserMM, CharleerS, FieuwsS, et al.Comparing real-time and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes (ALERTT1): a 6-month, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2021; 397(10291): 2275–83.
41.
DeissD, IraceC, CarlsonG, TwedenKS, KaufmanFR. Real-world safety of an implantable continuous glucose sensor over multiple cycles of use: a post-market registry study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22: 48–52.
42.
IraceC, CutruzzolàA, NuzziA, et al.Clinical use of a 180-day implantable glucose sensor improves glycated haemoglobin and time in range in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2020; 22: 1056–61.
43.
KropffJ, ChoudharyP, NeupaneS, et al.Accuracy and longevity of an implantable continuous glucose sensor in the PRECISE study: a 180-day, prospective, multicenter, pivotal trial. Diabetes Care, 2017; 40: 63–68.
44.
SanchezP, Ghosh-DastidarS, TwedenKS, KaufmanFR. Real-World Data from the First U.S. Commercial users of an implantable continuous glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21: 677–81
45.
JafriRZ, BalliroCA, El-KhatibF, et al.A Three-way accuracy comparison of the Dexcom G5, Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense Continuous glucose monitoring devices in a home-use study of subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22: 846–52.
46.
GargSK, LiljenquistD, BodeB, et al.Evaluation of accuracy and safety of the Next-Generation Up to 180-Day Long-Term Implantable Eversense Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: the PROMISE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 84–92.
47.
RenardE, RivelineJP, HanaireH, GuerciB. Reduction of clinically important low glucose excursions with a long-term implantable continuous glucose monitoring system in adults with type 1 diabetes prone to hypoglycaemia: the France Adoption Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24: 859–67.
48.
MariglianoM, EckertAJ, GunessPK, et al.Association of the use of diabetes technology with HbA1c and BMI-SDS in an international cohort of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: The SWEET project experience. Pediatr Diabetes, 2021; 22: 1120–8.
49.
TeoE, HassanN, TamW, KohS. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis. Diabetologia, 2022; 65: 604–19.
50.
PeekME, ThomasCC. Broadening access to continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA, 2022; 325: 2255–57.
51.
KarterAJ, ParkerMM, MoffetHH, GilliamLK, DlottR. Continuous glucose monitor use prevents glycemic deterioration in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24: 332–37.
52.
EvansM, WelshZ, SeiboldA. Reductions in HbA1c with flash glucose monitoring are sustained for up to 24 months: a meta-analysis of 75 real-world observational studies. Diabetes Ther, 2022; 13: 1175–85.
53.
MartensT, BeckRW, BaileyR, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2021; 325: 2262–72.
54.
PasquelFJ, LansangMC, DhatariyaK, UmpierrezGE. Management of diabetes and hyperglycaemia in the hospital. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2021; 9: 174–88.
55.
LombardiA, AgarwalS, SchechterC, TomerY. In-Hospital Hyperglycemia is associated with worse outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19. Diabetes Care 2022 Aug 30;dc220708. doi: 10.2337/dc22-0708. Online ahead of print.
56.
BodeB, GarrettV, MesslerJ, et al.Glycemic Characteristics and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the United States. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2020; 14: 813–21.
57.
VillardO, BretonMD, RaoS, et al.Accuracy of a factory-calibrated continuous glucose monitor in individuals with diabetes on hemodialysis. Diabetes Care, 2022; 45: 1666-69.
58.
BoughtonCK, DalyA, ThabitH, et al.Day-to-day variability of insulin requirements in the inpatient setting: observations during fully closed-loop insulin delivery. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 1978–82.
59.
BallyL, ThabitH, HartnellS, et al.Closed-loop insulin delivery for glycemic control in noncritical care. N Engl J Med, 2018; 379: 547–56.
60.
BoughtonCK, BallyL, MartignoniF, et al.Fully closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a two-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2019; 7: 368–77.
61.
PhillipM, NimriR, BergenstalRM, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies in clinical practice. Endocr Rev 2022 Sep 6;bnac022. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnac022. Online ahead of print.