Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Noninsulin-Treated People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Introduction:

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown favorable outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are on insulin therapy. However, the efficacy of CGM in managing glucose levels in noninsulin-treated people with T2D remains controversial.

Methods:

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGM to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with T2D not using insulin. We computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I ² statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.3.

Results:

We included six RCTs comprising 407 noninsulin-treated people with T2D of whom 228 were randomized to CGM. Diabetes duration ranged from 5.4 to 13.9 years. The mean age was 57.9 years and the mean body mass index was 30.8 kg/m². Four trials used real-time CGM (rt-CGM) and two intermittent scanning CGM (is-CGM). Compared with SMBG, CGM significantly reduced the glycated hemoglobin level (WMD −0.31%; 95% CI −0.42 to −0.21; I ² = 0%), glucose level (WMD −11.16 mg/dL; 95% CI −19.94 to −2.39; I ² = 0%), time in hypoglycemia level 2 (WMD −0.28%; 95% CI −0.52 to −0.03; I ² = 91%), glucose time >180 mg/dL (WMD −7.75%; 95% CI −12.04 to −3.45; I ² = 0%), and the standard deviation of glucose variation (WMD −4.00 mg/dL; 95% CI −6.86 to −1.14; I ² = 0%). CGM also increased time in range (WMD 8.63%; 95% CI 4.54–12.71; I ² = 0%) and treatment satisfaction (SMD 0.79; 95% CI 0.54–1.05; I ² = 0%).

Conclusion:

In this meta-analysis, rt-CGM and is-CGM were associated with improvement in glycemic control in people with T2D not using insulin when compared to SMBG.