International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed. International Diabetes Federation: Brussels; 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition [Last accessed: January 31, 2022].
2.
SussmanM, BennerJ, HallerMJ, et al.Estimated lifetime economic burden of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22(2):121–130; doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0398
3.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41(5):917–928.
4.
LinkCL, McKinlayJB. Disparities in the prevalence of diabetes: Is it race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status? Results from the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) survey. Ethn Dis, 2009; 19(3):288–292.
5.
GargSK, KipnesM, CastorinoK, et al.Accuracy and safety of Dexcom G7 continuous glucose monitoring in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(6):373–380; doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0011
6.
WhooleyS. FDA clears Abbott's next-gen FreeStyle Libre 3 14-day CGM. Drug Delivery Business News. May 31, 2022. Available from: https://www.drugdeliverybusiness.com/fda-abbott-next-gen-freestyle-libre-3-cgm [Last accessed: January 6, 2023].
7.
GargSK, PottsRO, AckermanNR, et al.Correlation of fingerstick blood glucose measurements with GlucoWatch biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 1999; 22(10):1708–1714; doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.10.1708
8.
TamadaJA, GargS, JovanovicL, et al.Noninvasive glucose monitoring: Comprehensive clinical results. Cygnus Research Team. JAMA, 1999; 282(19):1839–1844; doi: 10.1001/jama.282.19.1839
9.
GrossTM, BodeBW, EinhornD, et al.Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2000; 2(1):49–56; doi: 10.1089/152091500316737
10.
GargS, ZisserH, SchwartzS, et al.Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2006; 29(1):44–50; doi: 10.2337/diacare.29.01.06.dc05-1686
11.
WeinsteinRL, SchwartzSL, BrazgRL, et al.Accuracy of the 5-day FreeStyle navigator continuous glucose monitoring system: Comparison with frequent laboratory reference measurements. Diabetes Care, 2007; 30(5):1125–1130; doi: 10.2337/dc06-1602
GargSK, LiljenquistD, BodeB, et al.Evaluation of accuracy and safety of the next-generation up to 180-day long-term implantable eversense continuous glucose monitoring system: The PROMISE Study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(2):84–92; doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0182
14.
WhooleyS. Medtronic wins CE mark for smart insulin pen, Guardian 4 sensor. Drug Delivery Business News. May 26, 2021. Available from: https://www.drugdeliverybusiness.com/medtronic-wins-ce-mark-for-smart-insulin-pen-cgm-system [Last accessed: February 16, 2023].
15.
CarlsonA, SherrJ, ShulmanD, et al.Safety and glycemic outcomes during the MiniMed advanced hybrid closed-loop system pivotal trial in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(3):178–189. PMID: 34694909
16.
WadwaRP, LaffelLM, ShahVN, et al.Accuracy of a factory-calibrated, real-time continuous glucose monitoring system during 10 days of use in youth and adults with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20(6):395–402; doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0150
17.
ShahVN, LaffelLM, WadwaRP, et al.Performance of a factory-calibrated real-time continuous glucose monitoring system utilizing an automated sensor applicator. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20(6):428–433.
18.
RicksonM, WrightEE, BindalA, GhonimL. Advancements in diabetes technology are outpacing the evidence. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-35–S-41.
19.
WrightEE, SubramanianS.Is continuous glucose monitoring a tool, an intervention, or both?. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-48–S-55.
20.
GavinIII JR, BaileyCJ. Continuous glucose monitoring impact and implications of real-world evidence: Past, present, and future. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-5–S-13.
21.
GagnumV, SteneLC, JenssenTG, et al.Causes of death in childhood-onset Type 1 diabetes: Long-term follow-up. Diabet Med, 2017; 34(1):56–63; doi: 10.1111/dme.13114
22.
RaghupathyP.Diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents. Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 2015; 19(Suppl. 1) S55–S57.
23.
VirdiN, PoonY, AbanielR, BergenstalRM. Prevalence, cost, and burden of ketoacidosis. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-75–S-84.
24.
UngerJ, FrancoDR. Practical application of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice: Case studies. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-21–S-34.
25.
RuedyKJ, ParkinCG, RiddlesworthTD, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin: Results from the DIAMOND trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2017; 11(6):1138–1146.
26.
PratleyRE, KanapkaLG, RickelsMR, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in older adults with type 1 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2020; 323(23):2397–2406.
27.
MunshiM, SlyneC, DavisD, et al.Use of technology in older adults with type 1 diabetes: Clinical characteristics and glycemic metrics. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(1):1–9; doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0246
28.
McCarthyM, GreyM. Type 1 diabetes self-management from emerging adulthood through older adulthood. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41(8):1608–1614; doi: 10.2337/dc17-2597.dc17-2597
29.
WeinstockRS, XingD, MaahsDM, et al.Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: Results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2013; 98(8):3411–3419; doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1589.jc.2013-1589
30.
MunshiMN.Continuous glucose monitoring use in older adults for optimal diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-56–S-64.
31.
National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC). Sickle cell trait and other hemoglobinopathies and diabetes: important information for providers. Available from: https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/professionals/clinical-tools-patient-management/diabetes/sickle-cell-trait-hemoglobinopathies-diabetes [Last accessed: September 12, 2020].
32.
NielsenLR, EkbomP, DammP, et al.HbA1c levels are significantly lower in early and late pregnancy. Diabetes Care, 2005; 27(5):1200–1201.
33.
BryL, ChenPC, SacksDB. Effects of hemoglobin variants and chemically modified derivatives on assays for glycohemoglobin. Clin Chem, 2001; 47(2):153–163.
34.
GalindoRJ, BeckRW, SciosciaMF, et al.Glycemic monitoring and management in advanced chronic kidney disease. Endocr Rev, 2020; 41(5):756–774; doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa017
35.
BergenstalRM, GalRL, ConnorCG, et al.Racial differences in the relationship of glucose concentrations and hemoglobin A1c levels. Ann Intern Med, 2017; 167(2):95–102.
36.
ShipmanKE, JawadM, SullivanKM, et al.Ethnic/racial determinants of glycemic markers in a UK sample. Acta Diabetol, 2015; 52:687–692.
37.
WolffenbuttelBHR, HermanWH, GrossJL, et al.Ethnic differences in glycemicmarkers in patientswith type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2013; 36:2931–2936.
38.
DunnTC, XuY, BergenstalRM, et al.Personalized glycated hemoglobin in diabetes management: closing the gap with glucose management indicator. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-65–S-74.
39.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Overweight & Obesity. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html [Last accessed: August 9, 2020].
40.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Diabetes Prevention Program. About Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes. December 27, 2022. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/about-prediabetes.html [Last accessed: January 6, 2023].
41.
YokotaN, MiyakoshiT, SatoY, et al.Predictive models for conversion of prediabetes to diabetes. J Diabetes Complications, 2017; 31(8):1266–1271; doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.005
42.
MillerE, PolonskyWH, MillerK.What role might there be for continuous glucose monitoring in the assessment of diabetes risk?. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-14–S-20.
43.
MidyettLK.One size fits all versus individualized medicine in type 1 diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2023; 25(S3):S-42–S-47.
44.
GargSK, RodriguezE, AlmurashiAM. Continuous Glucose Monitors/Hybrid Closed Loop Systems. Medscape, 2022. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2500145-overview [Last accessed: September 06, 2022].
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42(8):1593–1603.
47.
BattelinoT, AlexanderCM, AmielSA, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring and CGM metrics for clinical trials: An international consensus. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022; 11(1):45–57, 2023. PMID: 36493795
48.
Van der LindenJ, WelshJB, HirschI, et al.Real-time continuous glucose monitoring during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and its impact on time in range. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(S1):S1–S7.
49.
PetersAL, GargSK. The silver lining to COVID-19: Avoiding DKA admissions with telehealth. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22(6):449–453.