FeldmanB, BrazgR, SchwartzS, WeinsteinR. A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology – results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2003; 5: 769–778.
3.
DeissD, BolinderJ, RivelineJ, et al.Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care, 2006; 29: 2730–2732.
4.
GargK, ZisserH, SchwartzS, et al.Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor. Diabetes Care, 2006; 29: 44–50.
5.
KovatchevBP, ClarkeWL. Continuous glucose monitoring reduces risks for hypo- and hyperglycemia and glucose variability in diabetes. Diabetes, 2007; 56 (Suppl 1): 0086OR.
6.
The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2008; 359: 1464–1476.
7.
KlonoffDC. Continuous glucose monitoring: Roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care, 2005; 28: 1231–1239.
BergenstalR. Understanding continuous glucose monitoring data. In: Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in diabetes treatment, American Diabetes Association. Arlington, VA; 2018.
13.
NimriR, PiperM, PinskerJE, DassauE. Decision support systems and closed loop. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22(Suppl 1): S47–S62.
14.
NimriR. Decision Support systems for insulin treatment adjustment in people with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev, 2020; 17(Suppl 1): 170–182.
15.
NimriR, KovatchevB, PhillipM. Decision support systems and closed-loop. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(Suppl 2): S69–S84.
16.
JohnsonML, MartensTW, CriegoAB, CarlsonAL, SimonsonGD, BergenstalRM. Utilizing the ambulatory glucose profile to standardize and implement continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21(Suppl 2): S217–S225.
17.
WoldaregayAZ, ÅrsandE, BotsisT, AlbersD, MamykinaL, HartvigsenG. Data-driven blood glucose pattern classification and anomalies detection: Machine-learning applications in type 1 diabetes. J Med Internet Res, 2019; 21: e11030.
18.
WoldaregayAZ, ÅrsandE, WalderhaugS, AlbersD, MamykinaL, BotsisT, HartvigsenG. Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes. Artif Intell Med, 2019; 98: 109–134.
19.
AugsteinP, HeinkeP, VogtL, et al.Q-Score: Development of a new metric for continuous glucose monitoring that enables stratification of antihyperglycaemic therapies. BMC Endocr Disord, 2015; 15: 22.
20.
SpänigS, Emberger-KleinA, SowaJP, CanbayA, MenradK, HeiderD. The virtual doctor: An interactive clinical-decision-support system based on deep learning for non-invasive prediction of diabetes. Artif Intell Med, 2019; 100: 101706.
21.
TylerNS, Mosquera-LopezCM, WilsonLM, et al.An artificial intelligence decision support system for the management of type 1 diabetes. Nat Metab, 2020; 2: 612–619.
22.
WeismanA, BaiJW, CardinezM, KramerCK, PerkinsBA. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2017; 5: 501–512.
23.
KovatchevBP. The artificial pancreas in 2017: The year of transition from research to clinical practice. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2018; 14: 74–76.
24.
BekiariE, KitsiosK, ThabitH, et al.Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with type 1 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 2018; 361: k1310.
25.
KarageorgiouV, PapaioannouTG, BellosI, et al.Effectiveness of artificial pancreas in the non-adult population: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Metabolism, 2019; 90: 20–30.
26.
KovatchevBP, AndersonSM, RaghinaruD, et al.Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Closed-Loop Control. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 607–615.
27.
TauschmannM, ThabitH, BallyL, et al.Closed-loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: A multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet, 2018; 392: 1321–1329.
28.
BenhamouPY, FrancS, ReznikY, et al.Closed-loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes in real-life conditions: A 12-week multicentre, open-label randomised controlled crossover trial. Lancet Digital Health, 2019; 1: e17–25.
29.
BrownSA, KovatchevBP, RaghinaruD, et al., for the iDCL Trial Research Group. Six-month randomized multicenter trial of closed-loop control in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2019; 381: 1707–1717.
30.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration: FDA authorizes first interoperable, automated insulin dosing controller designed to allow more choices for patients looking to customize their individual diabetes management device system. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-first-interoperable-automated-insulin-dosing-controller-designed-allow-more-choices.
31.
LalRA, BasinaM, MaahsDM, HoodK, BuckinghamB, WilsonDM. One year clinical experience of the first commercial hybrid closed-loop system. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 2190–2196.
32.
AkturkHK, GiordanoD, ChampakanathA, BrackettS, GargS, Snell-BergeonJ. Long-term real-life glycaemic outcomes with a hybrid closed-loop system compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2020; 22: 583–589.
33.
Beato-VíboraPI, Gallego-GameroF, Ambrojo-LópezA, Gil-PochE, Martín-RomoI, Arroyo-DíezFJ. Rapid improvement in time in range after the implementation of an advanced hybrid closed-loop system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23: 609–615.
34.
CobryEC, HamburgerE, JaserSS. Impact of the hybrid closed-loop system on sleep and quality of life in youth with type 1 diabetes and their parents. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 22: 794–800.
35.
BergetC, MesserLH, VigersT, et al.Six months of hybrid closed loop in the real-world: An evaluation of children and young adults using the 670G system. Pediatr Diabetes, 2020; 21: 310–318.
36.
MesserLH, BergetC, VigersT, et al.Real world hybrid closed-loop discontinuation: Predictors and perceptions of youth discontinuing the 670G system in the first 6 months. Pediatr Diabetes, 2020; 21: 319–327.
37.
AtlasE, NimriR, MillerS, GrunbergEA, PhillipM. MD-logic artificial pancreas system: A pilot study in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2010; 33: 1072–1076.
38.
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretations: Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 1593–1603.
39.
BergenstalRM, NimriR, BeckRW, et al.A comparison of two hybrid closed-loop systems in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes (FLAIR): A multicentre, randomised, crossover trial. Lancet, 2021; 397: 208–219.
40.
CobelliC, RenardE, KovatchevBP, et al.Pilot studies of wearable outpatient artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2012; 35: e65–e67.
41.
BretonMD, KanapkaLG, BeckRW, et al.A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2020; 383: 836–845.
42.
BergenstalRM, BeckRW, CloseKL, et al.Glucose management indicator (GMI): A new term for estimating A1C from continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41: 2275–2280.
43.
BretonMD, KovatchevBP. One year real-world use of the control-IQ advanced hybrid closed-loop technology. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23: 601–608.
44.
DovcK, PionaC, Yeşiltepe MutluG, et al.Faster compared with standard insulin aspart during day-and-night fully closed-loop insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes: A double-blind randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 29–36.
45.
BoughtonCK, HartnellS, ThabitH, et al.Hybrid closed-loop glucose control with faster insulin aspart compared with standard insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes: A double-blind, multicentre, multinational, randomized, crossover study. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23: 1389–1396.
46.
El-KhatibFH, RussellSJ, NathanDM, SutherlinRG, DamianoER. A bihormonal closed-loop artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes. Science Transl Med, 2010; 2: 27ra27.
47.
CastellanosLE, BalliroCA, SherwoodJS, et al.Performance of the insulin-only iLet bionic pancreas and the bihormonal iLet using dasiglucagon in adults with type 1 diabetes in a home-use setting. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: e118–e120.
48.
RaoL, RenC, LuoS, HuangC, LiX. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol, 2021; 58: 869–880.
49.
DanneT, GargS, PetersAL, et al.International consensus on risk management of diabetic ketoacidosis in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 1147–1154.
50.
SinghS, RushakoffRJ, NeinsteinAB. A case report of diabetic ketoacidosis with combined use of a sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitor and hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2019; 13: 605–606.
51.
KudvaYC, CarterRE, CobelliC, BasuR, BasuA. Closed-loop artificial pancreas systems: Physiological input to enhance next-generation devices. Diabetes Care, 2014; 37: 1184–1190.
52.
ZaharievaDP, MesserLH, PaldusB, O'NealDN, MaahsDM, RiddellMC. Glucose control during physical activity and exercise using closed loop technology in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes, 2020; 44: 740–749.
53.
DeBoerMD, CherñavvskyDR, TopchyanK, KovatchevBP, FrancisGL, BretonMD. Heart rate informed artificial pancreas system enhances glycemic control during exercise in adolescents with T1D. Pediatr Diabetes, 2017; 18: 540–546.
54.
JacobsPG, ResalatN, El YoussefJ, et al.Incorporating an exercise detection, grading, and hormone dosing algorithm into the artificial pancreas using accelerometry and heart rate. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2015; 9: 1175–1184.
55.
CastleJR, El YoussefJ, WilsonLM, et al.Randomized outpatient trial of single- and dual-hormone closed-loop systems that adapt to exercise using wearable sensors. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41: 1471–1477.
56.
JacobsPG, El YoussefJ, ReddyR, et al.Randomized trial of a dual-hormone artificial pancreas with dosing adjustment during exercise compared with no adjustment and sensor-augmented pump therapy. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2016; 18: 1110–1119.
57.
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 1593–1603.