ForlenzaGP, Pinhas-HamielO, LiljenquistDR, et al.Safety evaluation of the MiniMed 670G system in children 7–13 years of age with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21(1):11–doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0264
2.
GargSK, WeinzimerSA, TamborlaneWV, et al.Glucose outcomes with the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2017; 19(3):155–doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0421
3.
ForlenzaGP, BuckinghamBA, BrownSA, et al.First outpatient evaluation of a tubeless automated insulin delivery system with customizable glucose targets in children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(6):410–doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0546
4.
BuckinghamBA, ChristiansenMP, ForlenzaGP, et al.Performance of the omnipod personalized model predictive control algorithm with meal bolus challenges in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20(9):585–doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0138
5.
BuckinghamBA, ForlenzaGP, PinskerJE, et al.Safety and feasibility of the OmniPod hybrid closed-loop system in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using a personalized model predictive control algorithm. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20(4):257–doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0346
6.
BretonMD, KanapkaLG, BeckRW, et al.A randomized trial of closed-loop control in children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2020; 383(9):836–doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736
7.
BrownSA, BeckRW, RaghinaruD, et al.Glycemic outcomes of use of CLC versus PLGS in type 1 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43(8):1822–doi: 10.2337/dc20-0124
8.
ForlenzaGP, EkhlaspourL, BretonM, et al.Successful at-home use of the tandem control-IQ artificial pancreas system in young children during a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21(4):159–doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0011
9.
WareJ, AllenJM, BoughtonCK, et al.Randomized trial of closed-loop control in very young children with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med, 2022; 386(3):209–doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111673
10.
CarlsonAL, SherrJL, ShulmanDI, et al.Safety and glycemic outcomes during the MiniMed™ advanced hybrid closed-loop system pivotal trial in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(3):178–doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0319
11.
MesserLH.Why expectations will determine the future of artificial pancreas. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20(S2):S265–S268; doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0116
12.
GartnerInc. Hype Cycle Research Methodology. Available from: www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp [Last accessed: June 15, 2022].
13.
FennJ, RaskinoM.Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2008; p. 256.
14.
RogersE.Diffusion of Innovation. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
15.
CastañedaJ, MathieuC, AanstootHJ, et al.Predictors of time in target glucose range in real-world users of the MiniMed 780G system. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; doi: 10.1111/dom.14807
16.
ForlenzaGP, VigersT, BergetC, et al.Predicting success with a first-generation hybrid closed-loop artificial pancreas system among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes: A model development and validation study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(3):157–doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0326
17.
ArrietaA, BattelinoT, ScaramuzzaAE, et al.Comparison of MiniMed 780G system performance in users aged younger and older than 15 years: Evidence from 12 870 real-world users. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2022; 24(7):1370–doi: 10.1111/dom.14714
18.
SilvaJD, LeporeG, BattelinoT, et al.Real-world performance of the MiniMed™ 780G system: First report of outcomes from 4120 users. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2022; 24(2):113–doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0203
19.
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: Recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42(8):1593–doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028
20.
VigerskyRA, McMahonC. The relationship of hemoglobin A1C to time-in-range in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21(2):81–doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0310
21.
BeckRW, BergenstalRM, ChengP, et al.The relationships between time in range, hyperglycemia metrics, and HbA1c. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2019; 13(4):614–doi: 10.1177/1932296818822496
22.
BretonMD, KovatchevBP. One year real-world use of the control-IQ advanced hybrid closed-loop technology. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(9):601–doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0097
23.
MesserLH, BergetC, PyleL, et al.Real-world use of a new hybrid closed loop improves glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(12):837–doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0165
24.
ArunachalumS, VeladoK, VigerskyRA, CorderoTL. Glycemic outcomes during real-world hybrid closed-loop system use by individuals with type 1 diabetes in the United States. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022:19322968221088608; doi: 10.1177/19322968221088608
25.
BergetC, AkturkHK, MesserLH, et al.Real-world performance of hybrid closed loop in youth, young adults, adults and older adults with type 1 diabetes: Identifying a clinical target for hybrid closed-loop use. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2021; 23(9):2048–doi: 10.1111/dom.14441
26.
Weissberg-BenchellJ, ShapiroJB, HoodK, et al.Assessing patient-reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: The psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures. Diabet Med, 2019; 36(5):644–doi: 10.1111/dme.13930
27.
VenkateshV, DavisFD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci, 2000; 46(2):186–204.
28.
DavisFD.Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manag Inform Syst Q, 1989; 13(3):319–340.
29.
O'MalleyG, MesserLH, LevyCJ, et al.Clinical management and pump parameter adjustment of the control-IQ closed-loop control system: Results from a 6-month, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23(4):245–doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0472
30.
MesserLH, ForlenzaGP, SherrJL, et al.Optimizing hybrid closed-loop therapy in adolescents and emerging adults using the MiniMed 670G system. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41(4):789–doi: 10.2337/dc17-1682
31.
BergetC, SherrJL, DeSalvoDJ, et al.Clinical implementation of the Omnipod 5 automated insulin delivery system: Key considerations for training and onboarding people with diabetes. Clin Diabetes, 2022; 40(2):168–doi: 10.2337/cd21-0083
32.
MesserLH, BergetC, ForlenzaGP. A clinical guide to advanced diabetes devices and closed-loop systems using the CARES paradigm. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21(8):462–doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0105
33.
GreenwoodDA, HowellF, ScherL, et al.A framework for optimizing technology-enabled diabetes and cardiometabolic care and education: The role of the diabetes care and education specialist. Diabetes Educ, 2020; 46(4):315–doi: 10.1177/0145721720935125
34.
RidleyM. Amara's Law. Available from: https://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/amaras-law/ [Last accessed: August 1, 2022].