CerielloA, StandlE, CatrinoiuD, et al.Issues of cardiovascular risk management in people with diabetes in the COVID-19 era. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 1427–1432.
2.
Prabhu NavisJ, LeelarathnaL, MubitaW, et al. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on flash and real-time glucose sensor users with type 1 diabetes in England. Acta Diabetol 2020. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01614-5.
3.
MaddaloniE, CoraggioL, PieraliceS, CarloneA, PozzilliP, BuzzettiR. Effects of covid-19 lockdown on glucose control: continuous glucose monitoring data from people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: e86–e87.
4.
DovcK, OsredkarSR, SchweigerDS, BattelinoT, BratinaN. Nationwide digital/virtual diabetes care of children, adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes during a covid-19 pandemic in Slovenia. Zdr Vestn, 2020; 89: 626–633.
5.
PhillipM, BergenstalRM, CloseKL, et al.The digital/virtual diabetes clinic: the future is now—recommendations from an international panel on diabetes digital technologies introduction. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2020; 23: 1–9.
6.
SeiglieJ, PlattJ, CromerSJ, et al.Diabetes as a risk factor for poor early outcomes in patients hospitalized with covid-19. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2938–2944.
7.
BattelinoT, BergenstalRM. Continuous glucose monitoring–derived data report-simply a better management tool. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2327–2329.
8.
DovcK, BattelinoT. Evolution of diabetes technology. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 2020; 49: 1–18.
9.
DovcK, BattelinoT. New technical approach to the diabetes therapy. Minerva Pediatr, 2020; 72: 263–277.
10.
DovcK, BattelinoT. Time in range centered diabetes care. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol, 2021; 30: 1–10.
11.
Rodriguez-GutierrezR, McCoyRG. Measuring what matters in diabetes. JAMA, 2019; 321: 1865–1866.
12.
LindM, PolonskyW, HirschIB, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring vs conventional therapy for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections the gold randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 2017; 317: 379–387.
13.
BattelinoT, DanneT, BergenstalRM, et al.Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 1593–1603.
14.
Šuput OmladičJ, Slana OzimičA, VovkA, et al.Acute hyperglycemia and spatial working memory in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 1941–1944.
15.
Foland-RossLC, TongG, MaurasN, et al.Brain function differences in children with type 1 diabetes: a functional MRI study of working memory. Diabetes, 2020; 69: 1770–1778.
16.
Van LoockeM, BattelinoT, TittelSR, et al. Lower HbA1c targets are associated with better metabolic control. Eur J Pediatr 2021 Jan 7. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03891-2 [Epub ahead of print].
17.
RedondoMJ, LibmanI, MaahsDM, et al.The evolution of hemoglobin A 1c targets for youth with type 1 diabetes: rationale and supporting evidence. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: 301–312.
18.
MillerVA, XiaoR, SlickN, FeudtnerC, WilliSM. Youth involvement in the decision to start CGM predicts subsequent CGM use. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2355–2361.
19.
AhmadiSS, WestmanK, PivodicA, et al.The association between HbA1c and time in hypoglycemia during cgm and self-monitoring of blood glucose in people with type 1 diabetes and multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized clinical trial (GOLD-4). Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2017–2024.
20.
OliverN, GimenezM, CalhounP, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes on multiple-dose injection therapy: the relationship between glycemic control and hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 53–58.
21.
GómezAM, HenaoDC, Imitola MaderoA, et al.Defining high glycemic variability in type 1 diabetes: comparison of multiple indexes to identify patients at risk of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21: 430–439.
22.
MonnierL, WojtusciszynA, MolinariN, ColetteC, RenardE, OwensD. Respective contributions of glycemic variability and mean daily glucose as predictors of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: are they equivalent?. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 821–827.
23.
WilmotEG, ChoudharyP, LeelarathnaL, BaxterM. Glycaemic variability: the under-recognized therapeutic target in type 1 diabetes care. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21: 2599–2608.
24.
BattelinoT, DovčK. Glycemic variability: the danger of a physiologically stable metric. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020; 105: e3815-e3817.
25.
BeckRW, BergenstalRM, RiddlesworthTD, et al.Validation of time in range as an outcome measure for diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42: 400–405.
26.
LittleSA, LeelarathnaL, WalkinshawE, et al.Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS). Diabetes Care, 2014; 37: 2114–2122.
27.
FeigDS, DonovanLE, CorcoyR, et al.Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2017; 390: 2347–2359.
28.
KarP. Technology and the NHS—a world of false promises?. BMJ, 2019; 367: l6135.
29.
CharleerS, MathieuC, NobelsF, et al.Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control, acute admissions, and quality of life: a real-world study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2018; 103: 1224–1232.
30.
CharleerS, De BlockC, NobelsF, et al.Sustained impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump therapy: results after the 24-month rescue study. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 3016–3023.
31.
Gomez-PeraltaF, DunnT, LanduytK, XuY, Merino-TorresJF. Flash glucose monitoring reduces glycemic variability and hypoglycemia: real-world data from Spain. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020; 8: e001052.
32.
BoucherSE, GrayAR, WiltshireEJ, et al.Effect of 6 months of flash glucose monitoring in youth with type 1 diabetes and high-risk glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2388–2395.
33.
EvansM, WelshZ, EllsS, SeiboldA. The Impact of flash glucose monitoring on glycaemic control as measured by HbA1c: a meta-analysis of clinical trials and real-world observational studies. Diabetes Ther, 2020; 11: 83–95.
34.
FortmannAL, BagsicSRS, TalaveraL, et al.Glucose as the fifth vital sign: a randomized controlled trial of continuous glucose monitoring in a non-ICU hospital setting. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 2873–2877.
35.
BarronE, BakhaiC, KarP, et al.Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID-19-related mortality in England: a whole-population study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2020; 8: 813–822.
36.
CerielloA, StandlE, CatrinoiuD, et al.Issues of cardiovascular risk management in people with diabetes in the COVID-19 era. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: 1427–1432.
37.
AgarwalS, MathewJ, DavisGM, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Care 2020: dc202219. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-2219 [Epub ahead of print].
38.
Drole TorkarA, PlesnikE, GroseljU, BattelinoT, KotnikP. Carotid intima-media thickness in healthy children and adolescents: normative data and systematic literature review. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2020; 7: 597768.
39.
RiddellMC, GallenIW, SmartCE, et al.Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2017; 5: 377–390.
40.
BurckhardtMA, AbrahamMB, MountainJ, et al.Improvement in psychosocial outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents following subsidy for continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21: 538–545.
41.
AddalaA, AuzanneauM, MillerK, et al.A decade of disparities in diabetes technology use and HbA 1c in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a transatlantic comparison. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44: 133–140.
42.
MaddaloniE, CoraggioL, PieraliceS, CarloneA, PozzilliP, BuzzettiR. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on glucose control: continuous glucose monitoring data from people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy. Diabetes Care, 2020; 43: e86–e87.
43.
UrakamiT, YoshidaK, KuwabaraR, et al.Individualization of recommendations from the international consensus on continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics in Japanese children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Endocr J, 2020; 67: 1055–1062.