MartensT, BeckRW, BaileyR, et al.: Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2021; 325:2262–2272.
2.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes, 1995; 44:968–983.
3.
BeckRW, RiddlesworthTD, RuedyK, et al.: Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med, 2017; 167:365–374.
4.
KarterAJ, ParkerMM, MoffetHH, et al.: Association of real-time continuous glucose monitoring with glycemic control and acute metabolic events among patients with insulin-treated diabetes. JAMA, 2021; 325:2273–2284.
5.
YaronM, RoitmanE, Aharon-HananelG, et al.: Effect of flash glucose monitoring technology on glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2019; 42:1178–1184.
6.
HaakT, HanaireH, AjjanR, et al.: Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Ther, 2017; 8:55–73.
7.
ElliottT, BecaS, BeharryR, et al.: The impact of flash glucose monitoring on glycated hemoglobin in type 2 diabetes managed with basal insulin in Canada: a retrospective real-world chart review study. Diab Vasc Dis Res, 2021; 18:14791641211021374.
8.
WrightEEJr, KerrMSD, ReyesIJ, et al.: Use of flash continuous glucose monitoring is associated with A1C reduction in people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin or noninsulin therapy. Diabetes Spectr, 2021; 34:184–189.
9.
DicembriniI, MannucciE, MonamiM, PalaL: Impact of technology on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials on continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2019; 21:2619–2625.
10.
IdaS, KanekoR, MurataK: Utility of real-time and retrospective continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Diabetes Res, 2019; 2019:4684815.
11.
GavinJR, BaileyC: Real-world studies support use of CGM in type 1 and type 2 diabetes independently of treatment regimen. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23:S19–S27.
12.
PuhrS, WelshJB, BauzaCE, WalkerTC: Patients with type 2 diabetes and residual insulin secretory capacity realize glycemic benefits from real-time continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2021; 15:965–967.
13.
BaileyR, CalhounP, ChaoC, WalkerTC: With or without residualC-peptide, patients with type 2 diabetes realize glycemic benefits from real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0384.
14.
WadaE, OnoueT, KobayashiT, et al.: Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care, 2020; 8:e001115.
15.
JacksonMA, AhmannA, ShahVN: Type 2 diabetes and the use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23:S27–S34.
16.
ParkC, LeQA: The effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2018; 20:613–621.
17.
EhrhardtN, Al ZaghalE: Continuous glucose monitoring as a behavior modification tool. Clin Diabetes, 2020; 38:126–131.
18.
KrogerJ, SiegmundT, Schubert-OlesenO, et al.: AGP and nutrition—analysing postprandial glucose courses with CGM. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2021; 174:108738.
19.
ZeeviD, KoremT, ZmoraN, et al.: Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell, 2015; 163:1079–1094.
20.
BergenstalRM, KerrMSD, RobertsGJ, et al.: Flash CGM is associated with reduced diabetes events and hospitalizations in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. J Endocr Soc, 2021; 5:bvab013.
21.
SelvinE, ParrinelloCM, DayaN, BergenstalRM: Trends in insulin use and diabetes control in the U.S.: 1988–1994 and 1999–2012. Diabetes Care, 2016; 39:e33–e35.
22.
KazemianP, SheblFM, McCannN, et al.: Evaluation of the cascade of diabetes care in the United States, 2005–2016. JAMA Intern Med, 2019; 179:1376–1385.
23.
FangM, WangD, CoreshJ, SelvinE: Trends in diabetes treatment and control in U.S. Adults, 1999–2018. N Engl J Med, 2021; 384:2219–2228.
24.
MonnierL, ColetteC, DunseathGJ, OwensDR: The loss of postprandial glycemic control precedes stepwise deterioration of fasting with worsening diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2007; 30:263–269.
25.
MonnierL, ColetteC, DejagerS, OwensD: Magnitude of the dawn phenomenon and its impact on the overall glucose exposure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2013; 36:4057–4062.
26.
BergenstalRM, LayneJE, ZisserH, et al.: Remote application and use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring by adults with type 2 diabetes in a Virtual Diabetes Clinic. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2021; 23:128–132.
27.
DixonRF, ZisserH, LayneJE, et al.: A virtual type 2 diabetes clinic using continuous glucose monitoring and endocrinology visits. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2020; 14:908–911.
28.
GalRL, CohenNJ, KrugerD, et al.: Diabetes Telehealth Solutions: improving self-management through remote initiation of continuous glucose monitoring. J Endocr Soc, 2020; 4:bvaa076.
29.
American Diabetes Diabetes Technology: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care, 2021; 44:S85–S99.
30.
GrunbergerG, SherrJ, AllendeM, et al.: American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: the use of advanced technology in the management of persons with diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract, 2021; 27:505–537.