We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a pilot behavioral intervention delivered to parents of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) via mobile-friendly web app. The Type 1 Doing Well app aimed to promote supportive family diabetes management by helping parents recognize and reinforce teens' positive diabetes-related behaviors (“strengths”).
Methods:
Parents (n = 80, 74% recruitment) of adolescents (age range = 12–17 years, M = 15.3 ± 1.5 years, 59% female, 56% insulin pump, M hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) = 9.0% ± 2.1%) were randomized 2:1 to intervention or control (i.e., usual medical care with or without app) for 3–4 months between diabetes appointments. The app prompted parents daily to track adolescents' strengths and generated weekly summaries of their teen's top strengths. Parents could access a library of text messages to praise their teens. Exploratory pre/post data included questionnaires (98% completed) and HbA1c.
Results:
Parents used the app for M = 106.1 ± 37.1 days, logging in ≥once/day on 80% of days. Ninety-one percent of parents used the app ≥2 days/week on average. Parents viewed M = 5.6 ± 4.7 weekly summaries and “favorited” 15 praise texts in the library. App acceptability ratings (7-point scale) were high: Satisfaction 5.0 ± 1.5, Usefulness 4.8 ± 1.5, Ease of Use 6.2 ± 0.8, and Ease of Learning 6.5 ± 0.8. Parents (n = 48) and adolescents (n = 47) gave positive feedback and suggestions via qualitative interviews. There were no significant between-group differences for change in exploratory outcomes (HbA1c, questionnaires).
Conclusions:
Type 1 Doing Well was feasible to deliver and highly acceptable and engaging for parents of adolescents with T1D. It may have a larger impact on behavioral or clinical outcomes as part of a multicomponent intervention protocol. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02877680.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WiebeDJ, ChowCM, PalmerDL, et al.: Developmental processes associated with longitudinal declines in parental responsibility and adherence to type 1 diabetes management across adolescence. J Pediatr Psychol, 2014; 39:532–554.
2.
AndersonBJ, HolmbeckG, IannottiRJ, et al.: Dyadic measures of the parent-child relationship during the transition to adolescence and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Fam Syst Health, 2009; 27:141–152.
3.
RauschJR, HoodKK, DelamaterA, et al.: Changes in treatment adherence and glycemic control during the transition to adolescence in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2012; 35:1219–1224.
4.
FosterNC, BeckRW, MillerKM, et al.: State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2019; 21:66–72.
5.
WysockiT, NanselTR, HolmbeckGN, et al.: Collaborative involvement of primary and secondary caregivers: associations with youths' diabetes outcomes. J Pediatr Psychol, 2009; 34:869–881.
6.
JaserSS: Family interaction in pediatric diabetes. Curr Diab Rep, 2011; 11:480–485.
7.
HilliardME, HolmesCS, ChenR, et al.: Disentangling the roles of parental monitoring and family conflict in adolescents' management of type 1 diabetes. Health Psychol, 2013; 32:388–396.
8.
SpencerJ, CooperH, MiltonB: Qualitative studies of type 1 diabetes in adolescence: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Diabetes, 2010; 11:364–375.
9.
HilliardME, PowellPW, AndersonBJ: Evidence-based behavioral interventions to promote diabetes management in children, adolescents, and families. Am Psychol, 2016; 71:590–601.
10.
HoodKK, RohanJM, PetersonCM, et al.: Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1diabetes: meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control. Diabetes Care, 2010; 33:1658–1664.
11.
SchuellerSM, MunozRF, MohrDC: Realizing the potential of behavioral intervention technologies. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2013; 22:478–483.
12.
MulvaneySA, RitterbandLM, BossletL: Mobile intervention design in diabetes: review and recommendations. Curr Diab Rep, 2011; 11:486–493.
13.
MarkowitzJT, HarringtonKR, LaffelLMB: Technology to optimize pediatric diabetes management and outcomes. Curr Diab Rep, 2013; 13:877–885
14.
HerbertL, OwenV, PascarellaL, et al.: Text message interventions for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2013; 15:362–370.
15.
HilliardME, EshtehardiSS, MinardCG, et al.: Strengths-based behavioral intervention for parents of adolescents with type 1 diabetes using an mHealth app (Type 1 Doing Well): protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc, 2018; 7:e77.
16.
HilliardME, HarrisMA, Weissberg-BenchellJ: Diabetes resilience: a model of risk and protection in type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep, 2012; 12:739–748.
17.
HilliardME, HaggerV, HendrieckxC, et al.: Strengths, risk factors, and resilient outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results from Diabetes MILES Youth–Australia. Diabetes Care, 2017; 40:849–855.
18.
RohanJM, HuangB, PendleyJS, et al.: Predicting health resilience in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a test of the resilience model framework. J Pediatr Psychol, 2015; 40:956–967.
19.
Yi-FrazierJP, HilliardM, CochraneK, et al.: The impact of positive psychology on diabetes outcomes: a review. Psychology, 2012; 3:1116–1124.
20.
Van AllenJ, SteeleRG, NelsonMB, et al.: A longitudinal examination of hope and optimism and their role in type 1 diabetes in youths. J Pediatr Psychol, 2015; 41:741–749.
21.
HustonSA, BlountRL, HeideschT, et al.: Resilience, emotion processing and emotion expression among youth with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes, 2016; 17:623–631.
22.
LukácsA, MayerK, SasváriP, et al.: Health-related quality of life of adolescents with type 1 diabetes in the context of resilience. Pediatr Diabetes, 2018; 19:1481–1486.
23.
RosenbergAR, Yi-FrazierJP, EatonL, et al.: Promoting resilience in stress management: a pilot study of a novel resilience-promoting intervention for adolescents and young adults with serious illness. J Pediatr Psychol, 2015; 40:992–999.
24.
KichlerJC, KaugarsAS: Applying positive development principles to group interventions for the promotion of family resilience in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol, 2015; 40:978–980.
25.
LordJH, RumburgTM, JaserSS: Staying positive: positive affect as a predictor of resilience in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol, 2015; 40:968–977.
26.
HoodKK, IturraldeE, RauschJ, et al.: Preventing diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: results 1 year after participation in the STePS program. Diabetes Care, 2018; 41:1623–1630.
27.
SeligmanME, SteenTA, ParkN, et al.: Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol, 2005; 60:410–421.
28.
HilliardME, IturraldeE, Weissberg-BenchellJ, et al.: The diabetes strengths and resilience measure for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (DSTAR-Teen): validation of a new self-report measure. J Pediatr Psychol, 2017; 42:995–1005.
29.
de WitM, WinterdijkP, AanstootH, et al.: Assessing diabetes-related quality of life of youth with type 1 diabetes in routine clinical care: the MIND Youth Questionnaire (MY-Q). Pediatr Diabetes, 2012; 13:638–646.
30.
MarkowitzJT, VolkeningLK, ButlerDA, et al.: Re-examining a measure of diabetes-related burden in parents of young people with type 1 diabetes: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey—Parent Revised version (PAID-PR). Diabet Med, 2012; 29:526–530.
31.
Weissberg-BenchellJ, Antisdel-LomaglioJ: Diabetes-specific emotional distress among adolescents: feasibility, reliability, and validity of the problem areas in diabetes-teen version. Pediatr Diabetes, 2011; 12:341–344.
32.
WysockiT, BucklohLM, AntalH, et al.: Validation of a self-report version of the diabetes self-management profile. Pediatr Diabetes, 2012; 13:438–443.
33.
LewinAB, LaGrecaAM, GeffkenGR, et al.: Validity and reliability of an adolescent and parent rating scale of type 1 diabetes adherence behaviors: the Self-Care Inventory (SCI). J Pediatr Psychol, 2009; 34:999–1007.
34.
VarniJW, ShermanSA, BurwinkleTM, et al.: The PedsQL family impact module: preliminary reliability and validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2004; 2:55.
35.
KatzML, VolkeningLK, DougherCE, et al.: Validation of the Diabetes Family Impact Scale: a new measure of diabetes-specific family impact. Diabet Med, 2015; 32:1227–1231.
36.
HoodKK, ButlerDA, AndersonBJ, et al.: Updated and revised Diabetes Family Conflict Scale. Diabetes Care, 2007; 30:1764–1769.
37.
HarrisMA, AntalH, OelbaumR, et al.: Good intentions gone awry: assessing parental “miscarried helping” in diabetes. Fam Syst Health, 2008; 26:393–403.
38.
Jones-SanpeiHA, DayRD, HolmesEK: Core family process measures in the NLSY97: variation by gender, race, income, and family structure. Marriage Fam Rev, 2009; 45:140–167.
39.
LundAM: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 2001; 8:3–6.
40.
CzajkowskiSM, PowellLH, AdlerN, et al.: From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT Model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol, 2015; 34:971–982.
41.
Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology: Mobile FactSheet. 2019 [UpdatedJune , 2019]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/ (accessed December5, 2019).
42.
SchultzJM, GaleaS: Mitigating the mental and physical health consequences of Hurricane Harvey. JAMA, 2017; 318:1437–1438.
43.
HicksM, BurtonM: Hurricane Harvey: preliminary estimates of commercial and public-sector damages on the Houston MetropolitanArea. Ball StateUniversity. 2017 [UpdatedSeptember , 2017]. https://projects.cberdata.org/reports/HurricaneHarvey2017.pdf (accessed December5, 2019).
44.
SchwartzRM, TuminelloS, KerathSM, et al.: Preliminary assessment of Hurricane Harvey exposures and mental health impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2018; 15:e974.
45.
PriceJ, BeidasR, WolkCB, et al.: Implementation science in pediatric psychology: the example of type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol, 2019; 44:1068–1073.
