GargSK, WeinzimerSA, TamborlaneWV, et al.: Glucose outcomes with the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2017; 19:155–163.
SandersJE, CassisiDV, NeumannT, et al.: Relative influence of polymer fiber diameter and surface charge on fibrous capsule thickness and vessel density for single-fiber implants. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2003; 65:462–467.
4.
CastleJR, WardWK: Amperometric glucose sensors: sources of error and potential benefit of redundancy. J Diabetes Sci Technol, 2010; 4:221–225.
5.
BaileyTS, AhmannA, BrazgR, et al.: Accuracy and acceptability of the 6-day Enlite continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2014; 16:277–283.
6.
FacchinettiA, Del FaveroS, SparacinoG, et al.: Modeling transient disconnections and compression artifacts of continuous glucose sensors. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2016; 18:264–272.
7.
BasuA, VeettilS, DyerR, et al.: Direct evidence of acetaminophen interference with subcutaneous glucose sensing in humans: a pilot study. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2016; 18Suppl 2:S243–S247.
8.
Medtronic 670G User Guide. https://wwwmedtronicdiabetescom/sites/default/files/library/download-library/user-guides/MiniMed%20670G%20System%20User%20Guidepdf (accessed June19, 2017).
9.
KropffJ, BruttomessoD, DollW, et al.: Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2015; 17:343–349.
10.
KovatchevBP, PatekSD, OrtizEA, et al.: Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2015; 17:177–186.
