Abstract:
Background:
Concern was raised within the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) regarding the scoring of weak allergic versus doubtful patch test reactions.
Objective:
To investigate the degree of uniformity in patch test reading.
Methods:
Five series of fictive contact dermatitis cases were written up by the study organizer and presented to expert participants. Each series was sent electronically to participants one by one. All dermatitis cases underwent patch testing, and the test result was a reaction characterized by erythema and infiltration. Within each case series, there were 5 subcases that differed only in the size of the test area showing erythema and infiltration. Three nearly identical case series had 1 crucial difference: the result of a repeated open application test (ROAT), both in the cases and controls. The experts had to determine whether the patch test reaction indicated contact allergy, defined as an immunologically acquired delayed hypersensitivity. All other reactions (negative, doubtful, and irritant) were classified as no contact allergy.
Results:
There was a big intra- and inter-individual variation in the patch test reading. Nobody read according to any of the 2 existing ICDRG classifications. The ROAT results sometimes influenced the scoring.
Conclusion:
A new ICDRG classification is needed.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
0.00 MB0.01 MB 0.01 MB 0.01 MB 0.01 MB 0.00 MB 
