HaidtJ. (2024) The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. Penguin Press: New York.
4.
WuD, DongX, LiuD, et al.How early digital experience shapes young brains during 0–12 Years: A scoping review. Early Education and Development, 2023:1–37; doi: 10.1080/10409289.2023.2278117
MuppallaSK, VuppalapatiS, Reddy PulliahgaruA, et al.Effects of excessive screen time on child development: An updated review and strategies for management. Cureus, 2023; 15(6):e40608; doi: 10.7759/cureus.40608 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353947/ [Accessed June 4, 2024]
7.
WiederholdBK. The escalating crisis in adolescent mental health. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2022; 25(2):81–82.
8.
WiederholdBK. Raising resilient children in the age of COVID. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2022; 25(6):329–331.
9.
MillerJ, MillsKL, VuorreM, et al.Impact of digital screen media activity on functional brain organization in late childhood: Evidence from the ABCD study. Cortex, 2023; 169:290–308.
10.
OdgersCL. The great rewiring: Is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness? Nature, 2024; 628(8006):29–30.
11.
WiederholdBK. Children’s mental health in a pandemic-altered world: Technology’s evolving role. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2023; 26(1):1–2.
12.
ChengC, WangH-y, SigersonL, et al.Do the socially rich get richer? A nuanced perspective on social network site use and online social capital accrual. Psychol Bull, 2019; 145(7):734–764.
13.
WiederholdBK. Kids Will Find a Way: The Benefits of Social Video Games. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2021; 24(4):213–214; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2021.29211.editorial
14.
GrieveR, IndianM, WitteveenK, et al.Face-to-face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29(3):604–609; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.017
15.
EllisonNB, SteinfieldC, LampeC. The benefits of facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12(4):1143–1168; doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
16.
TuomelaR. (2016). Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
17.
RivaG, WiederholdBK, MantovaniF. Searching for the metaverse: Neuroscience of physical and digital communities. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2024; 27(1):9–18.
18.
RivaG, WiederholdBK, MantovaniF. Surviving COVID-19: The neuroscience of smart working and distance learning. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2021; 24(2):79–85.
19.
FischerR, CallanderR, ReddishP, et al.. How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing nine ritual types. Hum Nat, 2013; 24(2):115–125; doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9167-y
20.
StephensGJ, SilbertLJ, HassonU. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010; 107(32):14425–14430; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008662107
21.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press: New York.
22.
VerduynP, YbarraO, RésiboisM, et al.Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? a critical review. Social Issues Policy Review, 2017; 11(1):274–302; doi: 10.1111/sipr.12033
23.
O’DayEB, HeimbergRG. Social media use, social anxiety, and loneliness: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2021; 3:100070.
24.
CaplanSE. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2007; 10(2):234–242; doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9963
25.
Lapidot-LeflerN, BarakA. Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28(2):434–443; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014
