Parental mediation (PM) and parental phubbing (PP) are two pivotal factors that influence children’s screen media use. This study used response surface analysis to examine the combined effect of PM and PP on screen time among preschool children. A total of 3,445 parents with preschool-aged children participated in this study, providing self-reported data on PM, PP, and their children’s screen time (CST). The results revealed that CST decreased when parents enhanced their mediation behaviors and reduced phubbing behaviors in the cases of congruence between PM and PP. In instances of incongruence, reduced screen time was observed when parents exhibited lower frequency in mediating their CST and displayed fewer phubbing behaviors compared with situations where parents mediated their children more frequently but engaged in higher levels of phubbing behaviors. The findings suggest that PM play a significant role in mitigating preschool-aged children’s excessive screen time. Moreover, it is critical to establish positive role modeling by reducing PP behaviors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
De DeckerE, De CraemerM, De BourdeaudhuijI, et al.Influencing factors of screen time in preschool children: An exploration of parents’ perceptions through focus groups in six European countries. Obes Rev, 2012; 13 Suppl 1(s1):75–84; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00961.x
2.
EalesL, GillespieS, AlstatRA, et al.Children’s screen and problematic media use in the United States before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Dev, 2021; 92(5):e866–e882; doi: 10.1111/cdev.13652
3.
EyimayaAO, IrmakAY. Relationship between parenting practices and children’s screen time during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 2021; 56:24–29; doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.10.002
4.
YangX, WangZ, ZhuL. Electronic media use guidelines for young children. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 2016; 11:24–37. (In Chinese).
5.
StiglicN, VinerRM. Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 2019; 9(1):e023191; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191
6.
Gordon-HackerA, Gueron-SelaN. Maternal use of media to regulate child distress: A double-edged sword? Longitudinal links to toddlers’ negative emotionality. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2020; 23(6):400–405; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0487
7.
NevilleRD, McArthurBA, EirichR, et al.Bidirectional associations between screen time and children’s externalizing and internalizing behaviors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2021; 62(12):1475–1484; doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13425
8.
PonsM, Bennasar-VenyM, YañezAM. Maternal education level and excessive recreational screen time in children: A mediation analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(23):8930; doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238930
9.
JagoR, StamatakisE, GamaA, et al.Parent and child screen-viewing time and home media environment. Am J Prev Med, 2012; 43(2):150–158; doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.012
10.
LauricellaAR, WartellaE, RideoutVJ. Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2015; 36:11–17; doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001
11.
SharmaS, LeeCYA. Parental mediation and preferences for regulation regarding children’s digital media use: Role of protection motivation and theory of planned behaviour. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2023; 43(8):1499–1517; doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2023.2217275
12.
LeeEJ, KimHS. Effect of maternal factors on problematic smartphone use among elementary school children. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021; 18(17):9182; doi: 10.3390%2Fijerph18179182
BaiQ, LeiL, HsuehFH, et al.Parent–adolescent congruence in phubbing and adolescents’ depressive symptoms: A moderated polynomial regression with response surface analyses. J Affect Disord, 2020; 275:127–135; doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.156
15.
FuX, LiuJ, LiuR, et al.The impact of parental active mediation on adolescent mobile phone dependency: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020; 107:Article 106280; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106280
16.
DomoffSE, RadeskyJS, HarrisonK, et al.A naturalistic study of child and family screen media and mobile device use. J Child Fam Stud, 2019; 28(2):401–410; doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1275-1
17.
KonokV, BunfordN, MiklósiÁ. Associations between child mobile use and digital parenting style in Hungarian families. Journal of Children and Media, 2019; 14(1):91–109; doi: 10.1080/17482798.2019.1684332
18.
NielsenP, FavezN, LiddleHA, et al.Linking parental mediation practices to adolescents’ problematic online screen use: A systematic literature review. J Behav Addict, 2019; 8(4):649–663; doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.61
19.
ValkenburgPM, KrcmarM, PeetersAL, et al.Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1999; 43(1):52–66; doi: 10.1080/08838159909364474
LivingstoneS, HelsperEJ. Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2008; 52(4):581–599; doi: 10.1080/08838150802437396
22.
ChooH, SimT, LiauAKF, et al.Parental influences on pathological symptoms of video-gaming among children and adolescents: A Prospective Study. J Child Fam Stud, 2015; 24(5):1429–1441; doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-9949-9
23.
ShinW, HuhJ. Parental mediation of teenagers’ video game playing: Antecedents and consequences. New Media & Society, 2011; 13(6):945–962; doi: 10.1177/1461444810388025
24.
MeeusA, EggermontS, BeullensK. Constantly connected: The role of parental mediation styles and self-regulation in pre- and early adolescents’ problematic mobile device use. Human Communication Research, 2019; 45(2):119–147; doi: 10.1093/hcr/hqy015
25.
JohnsonL, ChenTA, HughesSO, et al.The association of parent’s outcome expectations for child TV viewing with parenting practices and child TV viewing: An examination using path analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2015; 12:70; doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0232-2
26.
CharmaramanL, LynchAD, RicherAM, et al.Associations of early social media initiation on digital behaviors and the moderating role of limiting use. Comput Human Behav, 2022; 127:107053; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107053
27.
BanduraA. Social learning theory. Prentice Hall; 1977.
28.
KyungsunY, GraceHC, HaejinJ. The effect of parents’ restrictive mediation in smartphone use time on adolescents’ smartphone use time: The moderation effect of parents’ smartphone use time and adolescents’ grade. Family and Culture, 2020; 32(4):1–28.
29.
LiuQX, FangXY, DengLY, et al.Parent–Adolescent communication, parental Internet use and Internet-specific norms and pathological Internet use among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28(4):1269–1275; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.010
30.
NiuG, YaoL, WuL, et al.Parental phubbing and adolescent problematic mobile phone use: The role of parent-child relationship and self-control. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020; 116(6):105247; doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105247
31.
ZhouJH, LiX, GongX. Parental phubbing and internet gaming addiction in children: Mediating roles of parent–child relationships and depressive symptoms. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2022; 25(8):512–517; doi: 10.1089/cyber.2022.0021
32.
MatthesJ, ThomasMF, StevicA, et al.Fighting over smartphones? Parents’ excessive smartphone use, lack of control over children’s use, and conflict. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020; 116(2):106618.
33.
LiuQQ, YangXJ, NieYG. Interactive effects of cumulative social-environmental risk and trait mindfulness on different types of adolescent mobile phone addiction. Curr Psychol, 2022; 42(20):16722–16738; doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02899-1
34.
FrankenA, LaceulleOM, Van AkenMAG, et al.Using response surface analysis to interpret the impact of parent–offspring personality similarity on adolescent externalizing problems. Eur J Pers, 2017; 31(1):104–117; doi: 10.1002%2Fper.2088
35.
SchönbrodtFD. Testing fit patterns with polynomial regression models. 2016, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/ndggf
36.
EdwardsJR. Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In: Advances in measurement and data analysis (DrasgowF, SchmittNW. eds.). Jossey-Bass; 2002.
37.
KivlighanDM, KlineK, GelsoCJ, et al.Congruence and discrepancy between working alliance and real relationship: Variance decomposition and response surface analyses. J Couns Psychol, 2017; 64(4):394–409; doi: 10.1037/cou0000216
38.
NestlerS, GrimmKJ, SchönbrodtFD. The social consequences and mechanisms of personality: How to analyse longitudinal data from individual, dyadic, round-robin and network designs. Eur J Pers, 2015; 29(2):272–295; doi: 10.1002/per.1997
39.
NestlerS, HumbergS, SchönbrodtFD. Response surface analysis with multilevel data: Illustration for the case of congruence hypotheses. Psychol Methods, 2019; 24(3):291–308; doi: 10.1037/met0000199
40.
HuangS, LaiX, LiY, et al.Does parental media mediation make a difference for adolescents? Evidence from an empirical cohort study of parent–adolescent dyads. Heliyon, 2023; 9(4):e14897; doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14897
41.
PancaniL, GerosaT, GuiM, et al.“Mom, dad, look at me”: The development of the Parental Phubbing Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2020; 38(2):435–458; doi: 10.1177/0265407520964866
42.
ChenL, ShiJ. Reducing harm from media: A meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 2019; 96(1):173–193.
43.
FamJY, MännikköN, JuhariR, et al.Is parental mediation negatively associated with problematic media use among children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2023; 55(2):89–99; doi: 10.1037/cbs0000320
44.
LeBlancAG, SpenceJC, CarsonV, et al.Systematic review of sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2012; 37(4):753–772; doi: 10.1139/h2012-063
45.
Miguel-BergesML, Santaliestra-PasiasAM, MouratidouT, et al.Combined longitudinal effect of physical activity and screen time on food and beverage consumption in European preschool children: The ToyBox-study. Nutrients, 2019; 11(5):1048; doi: 10.3390%2Fnu11051048
46.
TurelO. Videogames and guns in adolescents: Tests of a bipartite theory. Comput Human Behav, 2020; 109:106355; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106355
47.
FitzpatrickC, AlmeidaML, HarveyE, et al.An examination of bedtime media and excessive screen time by Canadian preschoolers during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pediatr, 2022; 22(1):212; doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03280-8
48.
VaalaSE, BleakleyA. Monitoring, mediating, and modeling: Parental influence on adolescent computer and internet use in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 2015; 9(1):40–57; doi: 10.1080/17482798.2015.997103
49.
MäättäS, KonttinenH, HaukkalaA, et al.Preschool children’s context-specific sedentary behaviours and parental socioeconomic status in Finland: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 2017; 7(11):e016690; doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016690
50.
OldsT, SinghB, MiatkeA, et al.The Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Use of Time in Australian Children and Adolescents. J Adolesc Health, 2023; 73(6):1068–1076; doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.07.007
