Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-11
Does Witnessing Racism Online Promote Individual and Institutional Anti-Racism Advocacy Among White Individuals? The Role of White Empathy,White Guilt,and White Fear of Other Races
The current study examined the role of White emotional responses (White empathy, guilt, and fear of other races) to (a) witnessing racism online (seeing racial/ethnic minorities discriminated in online interactions) and (b) exposure to online content on the group- and systemic-level racism against racial/ethnic minorities on White individuals' individual and institutional advocacy behaviors. Path analysis using data from 227 White adults revealed that White empathy explained significant indirect relations of witnessing online content on systemic- and group-level racism in society on individual and institutional advocacy behaviors. No significant indirect relations were found regarding witnessing racial/ethnic minorities being discriminated online interactions, but a significant direct link was observed on individual advocacy. In response to witnessing racism online, White empathy appeared to be promotive for advocacy engagement, whereas guilt and fear of other races seemed to be barriers. Limitations and implications for research are discussed.
KeumBT, MillerMJ. Racism on the Internet: conceptualization and recommendations for research. Psychology of Violence, 2018; 8:782–791.
3.
TynesBM, WillisHA, StewartAM, et al.Race-related traumatic events online and mental health among adolescents of color. Journal of Adolescent Health, 2019; 65:371–377.
4.
KeumBT, MillerMJ. Racism in digital era: development and initial validation of the Perceived Online Racism Scale (PORS v1.0). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2018; 64:310–324.
5.
PieterseAL, UtseySO, MillerMJ. Development and initial validation of the anti-racism behavioral inventory (ARBI). Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 2016; 29:356–381.
6.
DreyerBP, TrentM. Anderson AT et al. The death of George Floyd: bending the arc of history towards justice for generations of children. Pediatrics, 2020; 146:e2020009639.
7.
SpaniermanLB, HeppnerMJ. Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites Scale (PCRW): construction and Initial Validation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2004; 51:249–262.
8.
SiffordA, NgKM, WangC. Further validation of the Psychosocial Costs of Racism to Whites Scale on a sample of university students in the southeastern United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2009; 56:585–589.
9.
ChaoRCL, WeiM, SpaniermanL, et al.White racial attitudes and White Empathy: the moderation of openness to diversity. The Counseling Psychologist, 2015; 43:94–120.
10.
BanksKH, Kohn-WoodLP. The influence of racial identity profiles on the relationship between racial discrimination and depressive symptoms. Journal of Black Psychology, 2007; 33:331–354.
11.
KatzJ, MerrileesC, LaRoseJ, et al.White female bystanders' responses to a Black woman at risk for sexual assault: associations with attitudes about sexism and racial injustice. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 2018; 27:444–459.
12.
WinburnA, PerepiczkaM, FrankumJ, et al.Play therapists' empathy levels as a predictor of self-perceived advocacy competency. International Journal of Play Therapy, 2020; 29:144–154.
13.
Marín-LópezI, ZychI, Ortega-RuizR, et al.Empathy online and moral disengagement through technology as longitudinal predictors of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration. Children and Youth Services Review, 2020; 116:105144.
14.
SwimJK, MillerDL. White guilt: its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999; 25:500–514.
15.
HarveyRD, OswaldDL. Collective Guilt and Shame as Motivation for White Support of Black Programs 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2000; 30:1790–1811.
16.
GrzankaPR, FrantellKA, FassingerRE. The White Racial Affect Scale (WRAS): a measure of White guilt, shame, and negation. The Counseling Psychologist, 2020; 48:47–77.
17.
LinderC. Navigating guilt, shame, and fear of appearing racist: a conceptual model of antiracist White feminist identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 2015; 56:535–550.
18.
MekawiY, BresinK, HunterCD. White fear, dehumanization, and low empathy: lethal combinations for shooting biases. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 2016; 22:322–332.
19.
EkmanM. Online Islamophobia and the politics of fear: manufacturing the green scare. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2015; 38:1986–2002.
20.
NevilleHA, LillyRL, DuranG, et al.Construction and initial validation of the color-blind racial attitudes scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2000; 47:59–70.
21.
WangYW, DavidsonMM, YakushkoOF, et al.The scale of ethnocultural empathy: development, validation, and reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2003; 50:221–234.
22.
GeorgeD, MalleryP. (2011) SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference (10. Baskı). GEN, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
23.
SpaniermanLB, BeardJC, ToddNR. White men's fears, White women's tears: examining gender differences in racial affect types. Sex Roles, 2012; 67:174–186.
24.
MuthénLK, MuthénBO. (2017) Mplus user's guide. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.
25.
HayesAF, ScharkowM. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter?. Psychological Science, 2013; 24:1918–1927.
26.
DoaneAW, Bonilla-SilvaE. eds. (2003) White out: the continuing significance of racism. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
SobleJR, SpaniermanLB, LiaoHY. Effects of a brief video intervention on White university students' racial attitudes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2011; 58:151–157.
28.
CarrierLM, SpradlinA, BunceJP, et al.Virtual empathy: positive and negative impacts of going online upon empathy in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 52:39–48.
29.
SeargeantP, TaggC. Social media and the future of open debate: a user-oriented approach to Facebook's filter bubble conundrum. Discourse, Context and Media, 2019; 27:41–48.
