Mounting research shows negative psychological effects for social media and recognizes fear of missing out (FoMO) as a key driver of social media use. This article focuses on social media influencers (SMIs) and investigates potentially positive forms of usage on psychological well-being (i.e., happiness), including how FoMO impacts consumer response to SMIs. A serial mediation model using survey data (N = 604) indicates SMI-related activities are positively associated with a consumer's happiness. Furthermore, SMI-related activities jointly and positively mediate the relationship between FoMO and happiness. Individuals higher in FoMO more frequently visited SMIs' account profiles leading to more frequent purchasing of products recommended by SMIs, which in turn positively influenced happiness. Implications of the findings are discussed with suggestions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Snapchat. The Youth of the Nations: Global Trends Among GenZ. https://forbusiness.snapchat.com/blog/the-youth-of-the-nations-global-trends-among-gen-z (accessed May10, 2020).
2.
Pew Research. Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins (accessed October10, 2020).
3.
PrzybylskiA, MurayamaK, DeHannCR, et al.Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput Hum Behav, 2013; 29:1841–1848.
4.
AbellL, BuglassSL, BettsLR. Fear of missing out and relational aggression on Facebook. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2019; 22:799–803.
5.
WiederholdBK. How digital anxieties are shaping the next generation's mental health. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2017; 20:661.
6.
DempseyAE, O'BrienKD, TiamiyuMF, et al.Fear of missing out (FoMO) and rumination mediate relations between social anxiety and problematic Facebook use. Addict Behav Rep, 2019; 9:100150.
7.
ReerF, TangWY, QuandtT. Psychosocial well-being and social media engagement: the mediating roles of social comparison orientation and fear of missing out. New Med Soc, 2019; 21:1486–1505.
8.
RozgonjukD, SindermannC, ElhaiJC, et al.Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media's impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association?. Addict Behav, 2020; 110:106487.
9.
HuntMG, MarxR, LipsonC, et al.No more FOMO: limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. J Soc Clin Psychol, 2018; 37:751–768.
10.
KimJ, LeeJER. The Facebook paths to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2011; 14:359–364.
11.
YangCC. Instagram use, loneliness, and social comparison orientation: interact and browse on social media, but don't compare. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2016; 19:703–708.
12.
KellyY, ZilanawalaA, BookerC, et al.Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine, 2018; 6:59–68.
13.
TwengeJM, CampbellWK. Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents: evidence from a population-based study. Prevent Med Rep, 2018; 12:271–283.
14.
FrebergK, GrahamK, McGaugheyK, et al.Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat Rev, 2011; 37:90–92.
15.
DriverR. Instagram Reigns Supreme for Fashion and BeautyInfluencers. FashionNetwork. https://us.fashionnetwork.com/news/instagram-reigns-supreme-for-fashion-and-beauty-influencers,942744.html (accessed May10, 2020).
16.
Morning Consult. The influencer report: Engaging Gen Z and Millennials. https://morningconsult.com/influencer-report-engaging-gen-z-and-millennials (accessed May10, 2020).
17.
ChungS, ChoH. Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychol Market, 2017; 34:481–495.
18.
O'Neil-HartC, BlumensteinH. WhyYouTube stars are more influential than traditional celebrities. https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights/youtube-stars-influence (accessed May10, 2020).
19.
Daniel JrES, Crawford JacksonEC, WestermanDK. The influence of social media influencers: understanding online vaping communities and parasocial interaction through the lens of Taylor's six-segment strategy wheel. J Interact Advert, 2018; 18:96–109.
20.
BerezanO, KrishenAS, AgarwalS, et al.The pursuit of virtual happiness: exploring the social media experience across generations. J Business Res, 2018; 89:455–461.
21.
McCutcheonLE, LangeR, HouranJ. Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. Br J Psychol, 2002; 93:67–87.
22.
MaltbyJ, HouranJ, McCutcheonLE. A clinical interpretation of attitudes and behaviors associated with celebrity worship. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2003; 191:25–29.
23.
ReevesRA, BakerGA, TruluckCS. Celebrity worship, materialism, compulsive buying, and the empty self. Psychol Market, 2012; 29:674–679.
24.
MaltbyJ, DayL, McCutcheonLE, et al.Personality and coping: a context for examining celebrity worship and mental health. Br J Psychol, 2004; 95:411–428.
25.
KimM, KimJ. How does a celebrity make fans happy? Interaction between celebrities and fans in the social media context. Comput Hum Behav, 2020; 111:106419.
26.
PilgrimK, Bohnet-JoschkoS. Selling health and happiness how influencers communicate on Instagram about dieting and exercise: mixed methods research. BMC Public Health, 2019; 1:1054.
27.
MaslowAH. (1958) A Dynamic Theory of Human Motivation. In Stacey CL, DeMartino M, eds. Understanding human motivation. Howard Allen Publishers, pp. 520–548.
28.
MaltbyJ, HouranJ, LangeR, et al.Thou shalt worship no other gods—unless they are celebrities: the relationship between celebrity worship and religious orientation. Personal Individ Diff, 2002; 32:1157–1172.
29.
LeeJA, EastinMS. I like what she's# endorsing: the impact of female social media influencers' perceived sincerity, consumer envy, and product type. J Interact Advert, 2020; 20:76–91.
30.
LyubomirskyS, LepperHS. A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Soc Indicat Res, 1999; 46:137–155.
31.
HaferkampN, EimlerSC, PapadakisA-M, et al.Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2012; 15:91–98.
32.
ToddPR, MelanconJ. Gender differences in perceptions of trolling in livestream video broadcasting. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 2019; 22:472–476.
33.
HayesAF. (2018) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis second edition: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Ebook The Guilford Press, Google Scholar.
34.
SeoM, HyunKD. The effects of following celebrities' lives via SNSs on life satisfaction: the palliative function of system justification and the moderating role of materialism. New Med Soc, 2018; 20:3479–3497.
35.
PittmanM, ReichB. Social media and loneliness: why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Comput Hum Behav, 2016; 62:155–167.
36.
MilyavskayaM, SaffranM, HopeN, et al.Fear of missing out: prevalence, dynamics, and consequences of experiencing FOMO. Motivat Emot, 2018; 42:725–737.
