Sexual harassment (SH) occurs when people—mostly women—are targets of unwanted sexual comments, gestures, or actions associated with a lack of empathy on the part of the offender. Virtual Reality (VR) has been defined as the “ultimate empathy machine” because it allows the user to take other people's perspective. The present work aims to study the effect of a 360°-video-based VR experience (vs. traditional perspective-taking task) on empathy and related concepts (i.e., violent attitude, perspective taking, sense of oneness) toward a female victim of SH in a male sample. A within-subjects design was used with 44 men who experienced both conditions (360° and narrative). Results showed the superiority of the 360°-video experience over the narrative in increasing empathy, sense of oneness, and perspective taking toward a female victim of SH. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurnSM. The psychology of sexual harassment. Teaching of Psychology, 2019; 46:96–103.
2.
JollifeD, FarringtonDP. Empathy and offending: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggress. Violent Behaviour, 2004; 9:441–476.
3.
CuffBM, BrownSJ, TaylorL, et al.Empathy: a review of the concept. Emotion Review, 2016; 8:144–153.
4.
HarariH, Shamay-TsoorySG, RavidM, et al.Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 2010; 175:277–279.
5.
GeryI, MiljkovitchR, BerthozS, et al.Empathy and recognition of facial expressions of emotion in sex offenders, non-sex offenders and normal controls. Psychiatry Research, 2009; 165:252–262.
6.
SeidelEM, PfabiganDM, KeckeisK, et al.Empathic competencies in violent offenders. Psychiatry Research, 2013; 210:1168–1175.
7.
BarnettG, MannRE. Empathy deficits and sexual offending: a model of obstacles to empathy. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 2013; 18:228–239.
8.
HerreraF, BailensonJ, Weisz, et al. Building long-term empathy: a large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS One, 2018; 13:e0204494.
9.
RivaG. (2015). Embodied medicine: what human-computer confluence can offer to health care. In Gagglioli A, Ferscha A, Riva G, et al., eds. Human Computer Confluence: Transforming Human Experience Through Symbiotic Technologies. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter, pp. 55–79.
10.
AhnSJ, LeAMT, BailensonJ. The effect of embodied experiences on self-other merging, attitude, and helping behavior. Media Psychology, 2013; 16:7–38.
11.
PeckTC, SeinfeldS, AgliotiSM, et al.Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Consciousness and Cognition, 2013; 22:779–787.
12.
OhSY, BailensonJ, WeiszE, et al.Virtually old: embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. Computers in Human Behaviour, 2016; 60:398–410.
13.
SeinfeldS, Arroyo-PalaciosJ, IruretagoyenaG. et al. Offenders become the victim in virtual reality: impact of changing perspective in domestic violence. Scientific Reports, 2018; 8:2692.
14.
NeyretS, NavarroX, BeaccoA, et al.An embodied perspective as a victim of sexual harassment in virtual reality reduces action conformity in a later Milgram obedience scenario. Scientific Reports, 2020; 10:1–18.
15.
Gonzalez-LiencresC, ZapataLE, IruretagoyenaG, et al.Being the victim of intimate partner violence in virtual reality: first-versus third-person perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020; 11:820.
16.
HuangJ, ChenZ, CeylanD, et al. (2017). 6-DOF VR videos with a single 360-camera. In IEEE virtual reality (VR). Los Angeles, CA: IEEE, pp. 37–44.
17.
RepettoC, GermagnoliS, TribertiS, et al. (2018). Learning into the wild: a protocol for the use of 360° video for foreign language learning. In Cipresso P, Serino S, Ostrovsky Y, et al., eds. International Symposium on Pervasive computing paradigms for mental health. MindCare 2018. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, volume 253. Boston: Springer, pp. 56–63.
18.
KoolH. The Ethics of Immersive Journalism: a rhetorical analysis of news storytelling with virtual reality technology. Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society, 2016; 9:3.
19.
SteinfeldN. To be there when it happened: immersive journalism, empathy, and opinion on sexual harassment. Journalism Practice, 2019; 14:1–19.
20.
ArciniegaGM, AndersonTC, Tovar-BlankZG, et al.Toward a fuller conception of machismo: development of a traditional Machismo and Caballerismo Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2008; 55:19.
21.
Pérez-AlbénizA, De PaúlJ, EtxeberríaJ, et al.Adaptación de interpersonal reactivity index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 2003; 15:267–272.
22.
DavisMH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980; 10:85.
23.
Moral de la RubiaJ. Psychometric properties of the Toronto Alexitimia Scale of 20 items in Mexico [in Spanish]. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 2008; 11.
24.
TaylorGJ, RyanDP, BagbyRM. Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 1985; 44:181–199.
25.
FerrandoPJ, ChicoE. Adaptation and psychometric analysis of Marlowe and Crowne's social desirability scale [in Spanish]. Psicothema, 2000; 12:383–389.
26.
CrowneDP, MarloweD. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960; 24:349–354.
27.
SeinfeldS, Arroyo-PalaciosJ, IruretagoyenaG, et al.Offenders become the victim in virtual reality: impact of changing perspective in domestic violence. Scientific Reports, 2018; 8:2692.
28.
GlickP, Fiske ST (2018). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. In Social cognition. Routledge, pp. 116–160.
29.
AronA, AronEN, SmollanD. Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992; 63:596.
30.
LongoMR, SchüürF, KammersMP, et al.What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition, 2008; 107:978–998.
31.
UsohM, CatenaE, ArmanS, et al.Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 2000; 9:497–503.
32.
KennedyRS, LaneNE, BerbaumKS, et al.Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1993; 3:203–220.
FaulF, ErdfelderE, LangAG, et al.G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007; 39:175–191.
35.
BrysbaertM. How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables. Journal of Cognition, 2019; 2:16.
36.
JungSM, OhSH, WhangboTK. (2017). 360 Stereo image based VR motion sickness testing system. In 2017 International Conference on Emerging Trends & Innovation in ICT (ICEI). Pune, India: IEEE, pp. 150–153.
37.
LeeTM, YoonJC, LeeIK. Motion sickness prediction in stereoscopic videos using 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2019; 25:1919–1927.
38.
MelgarL. (2019). Reclaiming the streets: feminicidio and the space of women's rights in Mexico. In Negotiating Space in Latin America. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Rodopi, pp. 43–65.
