Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In recent years, smartphone and social networking services (SNS) use have received a great amount of scholarly attention regarding their potentially addictive effects. Conceptualized as smartphone or SNS use disorder, research has consistently demonstrated relations with daily-life impairments. However, Smartphone Use Disorder (SmUD), WhatsApp Use Disorder (WAUD), Facebook Use Disorder (FBUD), Instagram Use Disorder (IGUD), or Snapchat Use Disorder (SCUD) scores have not been compared with each other. This comparison could provide insight into which device/platform could be most related to daily-life impairments. The effective sample of this study comprised 439 German-speaking individuals (age M = 25.08, SD = 9.74; 271 women) who reported actively using a smartphone, as well as WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, and responded to the respective use disorder scales. Within-subjects analysis of variance and post hoc tests (p values adjusted with the Holm method) were used to compare smartphone and SNS use disorder scale scores. The results suggest that SmUD scores are highest in comparison with other SNS platforms. Although WAUD and IGUD scores did not differ from each other, these scores were higher than for FBUD and SCUD. SCUD scores were higher than FBUD scores. These results provide novel insight into how the smartphone and different SNSs may relate to engagement in problematic digital technology use.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

We Are Social Ltd. (2019) Digital 2019 Q4 global digital Statshot. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/key/NSBCWzcfsbGXTg (accessed Jan. 17, 2020).

Obar

, Wildman

. Social media definition and the governance challenge: an introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 2015; 39:745–750.

Facebook. (2020) Company Info | About Facebook. https://about.fb.com/company-info/ (accessed Jul. 1, 2020).

Inc

. (2020) About WhatsApp. https://www.whatsapp.com/about/ (accessed Dec. 1, 2020).

Instagram

Inc

. (2020) Terms of Use. https://help.instagram.com/581066165581870 (accessed Dec. 1, 2020).

Snap

Inc

. (2019) Terms of Service. https://www.snap.com/en-US/terms/ (accessed Feb. 5, 2020).

Elhai

, Dvorak

, Levine

, et al. Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2017; 207:251–259.

Elhai

, Levine

, Hall

. The relationship between anxiety symptom severity and problematic smartphone use: a review of the literature and conceptual frameworks. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2019; 62:45–52.

Marino

, Gini

, Vieno

, et al. The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2018; 226:274–281.

10.

Elhai

, Tiamiyu

, Weeks

, et al. Depression and emotion regulation predict objective smartphone use measured over one week. Personality and Individual Differences, 2018; 133:21–28.

11.

Karsay

, Schmuck

, Matthes

, et al. Longitudinal effects of excessive smartphone use on stress and loneliness: the moderating role of self-disclosure. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2019; 22:706–713.

12.

Stronge

, Mok

, Ejova

, et al. Social media use is (weakly) related to psychological distress. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2019; 22:604–609.

13.

Rozgonjuk

, Pruunsild

, Jürimäe

, et al. Instagram use frequency is associated with problematic smartphone use, but not with depression and anxiety symptom severity. Mobile Media & Communication, 2020. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/2050157920910190.

14.

Rozgonjuk

, Sindermann

, Elhai

, et al. Fear of missing out (FoMO) and social media's impact on daily-life and productivity at work: do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat use disorders mediate that association?. Addictive Behaviors, 2020; 110:106487.

15.

Billieux

, Schimmenti

, Khazaal

, et al. Are we overpathologizing everyday life? A tenable blueprint for behavioral addiction research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2015; 4:119–123.

16.

Montag

, Wegmann

, Sariyska

, et al. How to overcome taxonomical problems in the study of Internet use disorders and what to do with “smartphone addiction”?. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2019 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.59.

17.

Panova

, Carbonell

Is smartphone addiction really an addiction?. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2018; 7:252–259.

18.

Elhai

, Yang

, Rozgonjuk

, et al. Using machine learning to model problematic smartphone use severity: the significant role of fear of missing out. Addictive Behaviors, 2020; 103:106261.

19.

Rozgonjuk

(2019) Problematic smartphone use: behavioral, psychopathological, dispositional, and educational correlates. Tartu, Estonia: University of Tartu Press.

20.

Cudo

, Torój

, Misiuro

, et al. Problematic Facebook use and problematic video gaming among female and male gamers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2020; 23:126–133.

21.

Eyal

(2014) Hooked: how to build habit-forming products. New York, New. York: Portfolio/Penguin.

22.

Montag

, Lachmann

, Herrlich

, et al. Addictive features of social media/messenger platforms and freemium games against the background of psychological and economic theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019; 16:2612.

23.

Brand

, Wegmann

, Stark

, et al. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019; 104:1–10.

24.

Aparicio-Martínez

, Ruiz-Rubio

, Perea-Moreno

A-J

, et al. Gender differences in the addiction to social networks in the Southern Spanish university students. Telematics and Informatics, 2020; 46:101304.

25.

Sha

, Sariyska

, Riedl

, et al. Linking Internet Communication and Smartphone Use Disorder by taking a closer look at the Facebook and WhatsApp applications. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 2019; 9:100148.

26.

Kannen

(2018) SurveyCoder. https://www.ckannen.com (accessed Sep. 3, 2020).

27.

Montag

(2018) Homo digitalis: smartphones, social networks and the brain [in German]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH.

28.

R Core Team. (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Core Team.

29.

Aickin

, Gensler

. Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: the Bonferroni vs Holm methods. American Journal of Public Health, 1996; 86:726–728.

30.

van Deursen

AJAM

, Bolle

, Hegner

, et al. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 45:411–420.

31.

Marengo

, Sindermann

, Elhai

, et al. One Social Media Company to Rule Them All: Associations Between Use of Facebook-Owned Social Media Platforms, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and the Big Five Personality Traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020; 11:936.

32.

Ellis

, Davidson

, Shaw

, et al. Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2019; 130:86–92.

33.

Loid

, Täht

, Rozgonjuk

. Do pop-up notifications regarding smartphone use decrease screen time, phone checking behavior, and self-reported problematic smartphone use? Evidence from a two-month experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior, 2020; 102:22–30.

34.

Rozgonjuk

, Levine

, Hall

, et al. The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018; 87:10–17.

35.

Wilcockson

TDW

, Ellis

, Shaw

. Determining typical smartphone usage: what data do we need?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2018; 21:395–398.

36.

Rozgonjuk

, Elhai

, Hall

. (2019) Studying psychopathology in relation to smartphone use. In: Baumeister

, Montag

, eds. Digital phenotyping and mobile sensing. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 185–199.

37.

Kardefelt-Winther

A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 31:351–354.

38.

Cole

, Nick

, Varga

, et al. Are aspects of Twitter use associated with reduced depressive symptoms? The moderating role of in-person social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2019; 22:692–699.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB

Comparing Smartphone,WhatsApp,Facebook,Instagram,and Snapchat: Which Platform Elicits the Greatest Use Disorder Symptoms?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material