The present study investigates how excessive smartphone use predicts users' stress and loneliness while taking the moderating role of online self-disclosure into account. We conducted a two-wave panel survey with a quota sample of smartphone users (n = 461 at time 2 [T2]). We found no direct effects of excessive smartphone use on stress or loneliness. However, our results showed that online self-disclosure moderates the postulated relationships. That is, excessive smartphone use (time 1 [T1]) predicts increased stress (T2), for those smartphone users who do engage in little online self-disclosure. However, for those who communicate their feelings, anxieties, and problems online, excessive smartphone use (T1) can even reduce loneliness (T2) and relieve stress (T2).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThoméeS. Mobile phone use and mental health. A review of the research that takes a psychological perspective on exposure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018; 15:2692.
2.
BarnesSJ, PresseyAD, ScornavaccaE. Mobile ubiquity: understanding the relationship between cognitive absorption, smartphone addiction and social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 2019; 90:246–258.
3.
VordererP, KrämerN, SchneiderFM. Permanently online permanently connected: explorations into university students' use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 63:694–703.
4.
HefnerD, KnopK, SchmittS, et al.Rules? Role model? Relationship? The impact of parents on their children's problematic mobile phone involvement. Media Psychology, 2019; 22:82–108.
5.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ. The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 2013; 63:221–243.
6.
KoH-C, KuoF-Y. Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure?. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2009; 12:75–79.
7.
ChenHT, LiX. The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017; 75:958–965.
8.
HuangHY. Examining the beneficial effects of individual's self-disclosure on the social network site. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 57:122–132.
9.
BeranuyM, OberstU, CarbonellX, et al.Problematic internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:1182–1187.
10.
BianM, LeungL. Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 2015; 33:61–79.
11.
BianchiA, PhillipsJG. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2005; 8:39–51.
12.
DarcinAE, KoseS, NoyanCO, et al.Smartphone addiction and its relationship with social anxiety and loneliness. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2016; 35:520–525.
13.
HawiNS, SamahaM. To excel or not to excel: strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers and Education, 2016; 98:81–89.
14.
ChoHY, KimDJ, ParkJW. Stress and adult smartphone addiction: mediation by self-control, neuroticism, and extraversion. Stress Health, 2017; 33:624–630.
15.
LeeYK, ChangCT, LinY, et al.The dark side of smartphone usage: psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 31:373–383.
16.
HerreroJ, UrueñaA, TorresA, et al.Smartphone addiction: psychosocial correlates, risky attitudes, and smartphone harm. Journal of Risk Research, 2017; 9877:1–12.
17.
Pew Research Center (2019). Smartphone ownership is growing rapidly around the world, but not always equally. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally/ (accessed September17, 2019).
18.
Pew Research Center (2018). Social Media use in 2018. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/ (accessed September17, 2019).
19.
Kardefelt-WintherD. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 31:351–354.
20.
KwonM, LeeJ-Y, WonW-Y, et al.Development and validation of a Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS). PLoS One, 2013; 8:e56936.
21.
AndalibiN, OzturkP, ForteA. (2017) Sensitive self-disclosures, responses, and social support on Instagram: the case of #depression. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. New York: ACM, pp. 1485–1500.
22.
ChiuS. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 34:49–57.
23.
Deursen AJAMVan, BolleCL, HegnerSM, et al.Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 45:411–420.
24.
HaugS, CastroRPAZ, KwonMIN, et al.Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2015; 4:299–307.
25.
JeongSH, KimHJ, YumJY, et al.What type of content are smartphone users addicted to? SNS vs. games. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 54:10–17.
26.
ThoméeS, HärenstamA, HagbergM. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults—a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 2011; 11:1–11.
27.
WangJ, WangH, GaskinJ, et al.The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 53:181–188.
28.
KrautR, PattersonM, LundmarkV, et al.A social technology that reduces social investment and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 1998; 53:1011–1031.
29.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ. Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2007; 12:1169–1182.
30.
ChotpitayasunondhV, DouglasKM. How “phubbing” becomes the norm: the antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016; 52:591–600.
31.
MahapatraS. Smartphone addiction and associated consequences: role of loneliness and self-regulation. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2019; 00:1–12.
32.
GüzellerCO, CoşgunerT. Development of a problematic mobile phone use scale for Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 2012; 15:205–211.
33.
KimJH. Psychological issues and problematic use of smartphone: ADHD's moderating role in the associations among loneliness, need for social assurance, need for immediate connection, and problematic use of smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 2018; 80:390–398.
34.
KimJ-H. Longitudinal associations among psychological issues and problematic use of smartphones. Journal of Media Psychology, 2017:1–11.
35.
WangK, FrisonE, EggermontS, et al.Active public Facebook use and adolescents' feelings of loneliness: evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Adolescence, 2018; 67:35–44.
36.
BrunellAB. (2007) Self-disclosure. In: BaumeisterRF, VohsKD, eds. Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 811–812.
37.
KimJ, DindiaK. (2011) Online self-disclosure: a review of research. In: WrightKB, WebbLM, eds. Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 156–180.
38.
ZhangR. The stress-buffering effect of self-disclosure on Facebook: an examination of stressful life events, social support, and mental health among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017; 75:527–537.
39.
FrisonE, EggermontS. The impact of daily stress on adolescents' depressed mood: the role of social support seeking through Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 44:315–325.
40.
BevanJL, GomezR, SparksL. Disclosures about important life events on Facebook: relationships with stress and quality of life. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 39:246–253.
41.
ShawLH, GantLM. In defense of the Internet: the relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2002; 5:157–171.
42.
ClarkJL, AlgoeSB, GreenMC. Social network sites and well-being: the role of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2018; 27:32–37.
43.
große DetersF, MehlMR. Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2013; 4:579–586.
44.
ApaolazaV, HartmannP, MedinaE, et al.The relationship between socializing on the Spanish online networking site Tuenti and teenagers' subjective wellbeing: the roles of self-esteem and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 2013; 29:1282–1289.
45.
ValkenburgPM, PeterJ. The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents' existing friendships: a longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 2009; 59:79–97.
46.
KnopK, HefnerD, SchmittS, et al.Mediatisierung Mobil. Handy- Und Mobile Internetnutzung von Kindern Und Jugendlichen. 2015. Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien NRW, Band 77. Leipzig, Germany: Vistas.
47.
LaRoseR, LinCA, EastinMS. Unregulated internet usage: addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation?. Media Psychology, 2003; 5:225–253.
48.
SchoutenAP, ValkenburgPM, PeterJ. Precursors and underlying processes of adolescents' online self-disclosure: developing and testing an “Internet-attribute-perception” model. Media Psychology, 2007; 10:292–315.
49.
LehmanKA, BurnsMN, GagenEC, et al.Development of the brief inventory of perceived stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2012; 68:631–644.
50.
RussellDW. UCLA Loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1996; 66:20–40.
51.
RosseelY. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 2012; 48:1–36.
52.
HayesAF, MatthesJ. Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 2009; 41:924–936.
53.
KimJ, LaRoseR, PengW. Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: the relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2009; 12:451–455.
54.
van der AaN, OverbeeckG, EngelsRCME, et al.Daily and compulsive internet use and well-being in adolescence: a diathesis-stress model based on big five personality traits. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2009; 38:765–776.
55.
ElhaiJD, DvorakRD, LevineJC, et al.Problematic smartphone use: a conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2017; 207:251–259.
56.
ElhaiJD, LevineJC, DvorakRD, HallBJ. Non-social features of smartphone use are most related to depression, anxiety and problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017; 69:75–82.
57.
WangJL, GaskinJ, RostDH, et al.The reciprocal relationship between passive social networking site (SNS) usage and users' subjective well-being. Social Science Computer Review, 2018; 36:511–522.
58.
SchmuckD, KarsayK, MatthesJ, StevicA. “Looking up and feeling down.” The influence of mobile social networking site use on upward social comparison, self-esteem, and well-being of adult smartphone users. Telematics and Informatics, 2019; 42:101240.
59.
BazarovaNN, ChoiYH. Self-disclosure in social media: extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 2014; 64:635–657.
60.
WendorfJE, YangF. Benefits of a negative post: effects of computer-mediated venting on relationship maintenance. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 52:271–277.
61.
WirthW, Von PapeT, et al.An integrative model of mobile phone appropriation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2008; 13:593–617.
62.
WebbTL, SheeranP. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 2006; 132:249–268.
63.
ScharkowM. The reliability and temporal stability of self-reported media exposure: a meta-analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 2019; 13:198–211.
64.
NaabTK, KarnowskiV, SchlützD. Reporting mobile social media use: how survey and experience sampling measures differ. Communication Methods and Measures, 2019; 13:126–147.
65.
ForestAL, Wood JV. When social networking is not working: individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 2012; 23:295–302.
