HobbsWR, BurkeM, ChristakisNA, et al.Online social integration is associated with reduced mortality risk. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016; 113:12980–12984.
2.
LaranjoL, ArguelA, NevesAL, et al.The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2015; 22:243–256.
3.
MaherCA, LewisLK, FerrarK, et al.Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2014; 16:e40.
4.
MerolliM, GrayK, Martin-SanchezF. Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: a literature review and analysis of affordances. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2013; 46:957–969.
5.
NabiRL, PrestinA. SoJ. Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2013; 16:721–727.
6.
BurkeM, KrautRE. The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2016; 21:265–281.
7.
OhHJ, OzkayaE, LaRoseR. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014; 30:69–78.
8.
WenZ, GengX, YeY. Does the use of WeChat lead to subjective well-being?: The effect of use intensity and motivations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 2016; 19:587–592.
9.
EichstaedtJC, SchwartzHA, KernML, et al.Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 2015; 26:159–169.