This study aimed to expand on previous research by gathering international data on key stressors impacting on computer forensic investigators who are exposed to child exploitation material (CEM) as part of their role. Semistructured interviews were conducted with five members of law enforcement (LE) working in this area, from five independent and internationally separated organizations. The results of these interviews were explored using thematic analysis. The three key themes identified were “stressors related to work investigating CEM online,” “strategies for mediating stress related to investigating CEM online,” and “training to investigate CEM online.” Investigators of CEM online may experience stress from several sources, including but not limited to stress from exposure to the material. Other factors such as poor management, high workloads, and limited resources may also result in stress, and these stressors may be mediated to an extent. Recommendations for training, resources, psychological support, and management practices emerged from the research. Such strategies may reduce stress experienced by investigators in this role. This study furthers understanding by conducting an international examination of multiple centers. Identification of common themes and stressors identified by LE personnel in multiple countries can help in the development of international standards and guidelines in training and stress management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurkeRJ, MikkelsenA. Burnout, job stress and attitudes towards the use of force by Norwegian police officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 2005; 28:269–278.
2.
HowittD. (2006) Introduction to forensic and criminal psychology. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
3.
KrauseM. Identifying and managing stress in child pornography and child exploitation investigators. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2009; 24:22–29.
4.
ACPO. (2014) Good practice and advice guide for managers of e-crime investigation (official release version V0.1.4). www.digital-detective.net/digital-forensics-documents/ACPO_Good_Practice_and_Advice_for_Manager_of_e-Crime-Investigation.pdf (accessed September29, 2017).
5.
BradyPQ. Crimes against caring: compassion fatigue, burnout and self-care practices among professionals working with crimes against children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boise State University Archives, ID, 2012.
6.
ChouliaraZ, HutchisonC, KaratziasT. Vicarious traumatisation in practitioners who work with adult survivors of sexual violence and child sexual abuse: literature review and directions for future research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2009; 9:47–56.
7.
BurnsCM, MorleyJ, BradshawR, et al.The emotional impact on and coping strategies employed by police teams investigating internet child exploitation. Traumatology, 2008; 14:20–31.
8.
HoltTJ, BlevinsKR. Examining job stress and satisfaction among digital forensic examiners. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 2011; 27:230–250.
9.
Dutch National Police NPKK. (2013) Bouncing back: psychological resilience and working in a child exploitation team. The Netherlands: Dutch National Police NPKK Archives.
10.
JonesB, PlenoS, WilkinsonM. The use of random sampling in investigations involving child abuse material. Digital Investigation, 2012; 9:S99–S107.
PerezLM, JonesJ, EnglertDR, et al.Secondary traumatic stress and burnout among law enforcement investigators exposed to disturbing media images. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 2010; 25:113–124.
13.
WolakJ, MitchellKJ. (2009) Work exposure to child pornography in ICAC Task forces and affiliates. www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Law%20Enforcement%20Work%20Exposure%20to%20CP.pdf (accessed September29, 2017).
14.
CruzN. Ingesting poison: adapting to exposure to child pornography. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 2011; 80:7–91.
15.
PowellMB, CassematisP, BensonM, et al.Police officers' perceptions of the challenges involved in Internet Child Exploitation investigation. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 2014; 37:543–557.
16.
WrightR, PowellMB, RidgeD. Child abuse investigation: an in-depth analysis of how police officers perceive and cope with daily work challenges. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 2006; 29:498–512.
17.
EdelmannRJ. Exposure to child abuse images as part of one's work: possible psychological implications. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 2010; 21:481–489.
18.
LouwGJ, ViviersA. An evaluation of a psychosocial stress and coping model in the police work context. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 2010; 36:1–11.
19.
FolletteVM, PolusnyMM, MilbeckK. Mental health and law enforcement professionals: trauma history, psychological symptoms, and impact of providing services to child sexual abuse survivors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1994; 25:275–282.
20.
PowellMB, TomynAJ. Life satisfaction amongst police officers working in the area of child abuse investigation. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 2011; 13:187–194.
21.
JewkesY, AndrewsC. Policing the filth: the problems of investigating online child pornography in England and Wales. Policing and Society, 2005; 15:42–62.
22.
AndersonDG. Coping strategies and burnout among veteran child protection workers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 2000; 24:839–848.
23.
SamantraiK. Factors in the decision to leave: retaining social workers with MSWs in public child welfare. Social Work, 1992; 37:454–458.
24.
MarkiewiczA. Recruitment and retention of social work personnel within public child welfare: a case study of a Victorian department. Australian Social Work, 1996; 49:11–17.
25.
StevensonJ. Welfare considerations for supervisors managing child sexual abuse on line units. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middlesex University Archives, England, 2007.
26.
KirwanG, PowerA. (2013) Cybercrime: the psychology of online offenders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KirwanG, PowerA. (2012) The psychology of cybercrime: concepts and principles. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
28.
KirwanGH. (2016) Forensic cyberpsychology. In ConnollyI, PalmerM, BartonH, KirwanG, eds. An introduction to cyberpsychology. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 139–152.
29.
PowerA, KirwanG. (2012) Trust, ethics and legal aspects of social computing. In Dodig-Crnkovic G, Rotolo A, Sartor G, Simon J, Smith C (Chairs), Social turn–social computing–social cognition–social networks and multi-agent systems. Symposium. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB) and International Association for Computing and Philosophy (IACAP) World Congress2012.
30.
BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006; 3:77–101.
31.
AdamsGA, BuckJ. Social stressors and strain among police officers: it's not just the bad guys. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 2010; 37:1030–1040.
32.
ShaneJM. Organisational stressors and police performance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2010; 28:807–818.
33.
BishoppSA, WorrallJ, PiqueroNL. General strain and police misconduct: the role of organisational influence. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 2016; 39:635–651.
