Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-11
Positive Relationship Between Individuality and Social Identity in Virtual Communities: Self-Categorization and Social Identification as Distinct Forms of Social Identity
Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the relationship between individuality and social identity, indicating this area requires further examination. This study constructed a research model to help understand the positive role of individualized behavior and social identity in virtual communities. The results of an online survey conducted to assess our theoretical research model indicated that social identity can be expressed in two ways: self-categorization and social identification. Furthermore, we found individualized behavior was positively related to social identification, while self-categorization was directly derived from social identification.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SchwämmleinE, WodzickiK. What to tell about me? Self-presentation in online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2012; 17:387–407.
2.
KaletkaB, PelkaC. Web 2.0 revisited: user-generated content as a social innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2011; 5:264–275.
3.
KimJ. “I want to be different from others in cyberspace” The role of visual similarity in virtual group identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 2009; 25:88–95.
4.
DengY, HouJ, MaX, et al.A dual model of entertainment-based and community-based mechanisms to explore continued participation in online entertainment communities. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 2013; 16:378–384.
5.
CarmelD, RoitmanH, Yom-TovE. On the relationship between novelty and popularity of user-generated content. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2012; 3:69.
6.
ZhaoL, LuYB, WangB, et al.Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: a social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 2012; 32:574–588.
7.
ChristophersonKM. The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “on the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog.”. Computers in Human Behavior, 2006; 23:3038–3056.
8.
WallDS, WilliamsM. Policing diversity in the digital age: maintaining order in virtual communities. Criminology and Criminal Justice: An International Journal, 2007; 7:397–415.
9.
BrownR. Social identity theory: past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2000; 30:745–778.
10.
LeavittHJ. Task ordering and organizational development in the common target game. Behavioral Science, 1960; 5:233–239.
11.
TurnerJC. (1985) Social categorisation and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In: LawlerED, eds. Advances in group processes: theory and research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 77–122.
12.
PutnamR. (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
13.
MillikenF, MartinsLL. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. The Academy of Management Review, 1996; 2:402–433.
14.
LeeE. Effects of visual representation on social influence in computer mediated communication: experimental tests of the social identity model of deindividuation effects. Human Communication Research, 2004; 30:234–259.
15.
LuijtersK, Van Der ZeeKI, OttenS. Cultural diversity in organizations: enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2008; 32:154–163.
16.
JacksonSE, JoshiA, ErhardtNL. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 2003; 29:801–830.
17.
RinkF, EllemersN. Diversity as a basis for shared organizational identity: the norm congruity principle. British Journal of Management, 2007; 18:17–27.
18.
JansL, PostmesT, Van der ZeeKI. Sharing differences: the inductive route to social identity formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2012; 48:1145–1149.
19.
TajfelH. (1972) Social categorization (English translation of “La categorisation sociale”). In: MoscoviciS, ed. Introduction d la psychologie sociale, vol. 1. Paris: Larousse, pp. 272–302.
20.
TurnerJC, HoggMA, OakesPJ, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
PostmesT, SpearsR, LeeAT, et al.Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005; 89:747–763.
22.
AshforthBE, HarrisonSH, CorleyKG. Identification in organizations: an examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 2008; 34:325–374.
23.
McLeishKN, OxobyRJ. Social interactions and the salience of social identity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2011; 32:172–178.
24.
HuemerL, BecerraM, LunnanR. Organizational identity and network identification: relating within and beyond imaginary boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 2004; 20:53–73.
25.
HuangJ-H, HsiaoT-T, ChenY-F. The effects of electronic word of mouth on product judgment and choice: the moderating role of the sense of virtual community. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2012; 42:2326–2347.
26.
RenYQ, HarperFM, DrennerS, et al.Building member attachment in online communities: applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2012; 36:841–864.
27.
SnyderCR, FromkinHL. (1980) Uniqueness: the human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
28.
EllemersN, KortekaasP, OuwerkerkJW. Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1999; 29:371–389.
29.
ZhangY, TangLS, LeungL. Gratifications, collective self-esteem, online emotional openness, and traitlike communication apprehension as predictors of Facebook uses. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 2011; 14:733–739.
30.
PostmesT, HaslamSA, SwaabR. Social influence in small groups: an interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 2005; 16:1–42.
31.
DeauxK, MartinD. Interpersonal networks and social categories: specifying levels of context in identity processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2003; 66:101–117.
32.
ChuaAYK, BalkunjeRS. Beyond knowledge sharing: interactions in online discussion communities. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2013; 9:67–82.
33.
KampmeierC, SimonB. Individuality and group formation: the role of independence and differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001; 81:448–462.
34.
SwaabR, PostmesT, van BeestI, et al.Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007; 33:187–199.
35.
HarrisSG, MossholderKW. The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of Management, 1996; 22:527–547.
36.
BergamiM, BagozziRP. Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2000; 39:555–577.
